Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Pravastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Common Data Model of Multicenter Electronic Health Records in South Korea.
Sung Wan Chun, Hae Jin Kim, Ji A Seo, Suk Chon, Sung Eun Kim, Jung Hwa Jung, Sang Soo Kim, Hyejin Lee, Sanghoon Shin, So Hun Kim, Dughyun Choi, Hyeong Kyu Park, Soo-Kyung Kim, Ji-Hwan Bae, In-Kyung Jeong
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Pravastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Common Data Model of Multicenter Electronic Health Records in South Korea.","authors":"Sung Wan Chun, Hae Jin Kim, Ji A Seo, Suk Chon, Sung Eun Kim, Jung Hwa Jung, Sang Soo Kim, Hyejin Lee, Sanghoon Shin, So Hun Kim, Dughyun Choi, Hyeong Kyu Park, Soo-Kyung Kim, Ji-Hwan Bae, In-Kyung Jeong","doi":"10.5551/jat.65345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity pravastatin 40 mg/day and atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with dyslipidemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of 19 million patients across 14 secondary/tertiary hospitals, standardized to a Common Data Model. New users of pravastatin (40 mg/day) and atorvastatin (10 mg/day) were identified. Six distinct cohorts were used to assess the comparative effectiveness in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the risks of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), myalgia or rhabdomyolysis, and hepatotoxicity (measured by aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/alanine aminotransferase [ALT]). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to each cohort for effectiveness and safety analyses, followed by a meta-analysis of hospital-specific results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, patients were equally assigned to the pravastatin and atorvastatin groups for primary (n = 2,688/group) and secondary MACE prevention (n = 1,258/group) and to assess the risk of NODM (n = 2,391/group), new-onset myalgia or rhabdomyolysis (n = 11,799/group), and hepatotoxicity (AST, n = 4,034/group; ALT, n = 3,655/group). No significant differences were observed in the hazard ratios (HRs) for primary (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59-1.20) and secondary MACE prevention (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68-1.16). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the risk of NODM (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.79-1.23). The risk of new-onset myalgia/rhabdomyolysis (HR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.96) and the incidence of abnormal elevations in AST levels (2.35% vs. 3.37%, p<0.05) were significantly lower in the pravastatin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate-intensity pravastatin (40 mg/day) showed comparable effectiveness to moderate-intensity atorvastatin (10 mg/day) in preventing MACE with a more favorable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":15128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.65345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To compare the effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity pravastatin 40 mg/day and atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with dyslipidemia.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of 19 million patients across 14 secondary/tertiary hospitals, standardized to a Common Data Model. New users of pravastatin (40 mg/day) and atorvastatin (10 mg/day) were identified. Six distinct cohorts were used to assess the comparative effectiveness in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the risks of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), myalgia or rhabdomyolysis, and hepatotoxicity (measured by aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/alanine aminotransferase [ALT]). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to each cohort for effectiveness and safety analyses, followed by a meta-analysis of hospital-specific results.
Results: After PSM, patients were equally assigned to the pravastatin and atorvastatin groups for primary (n = 2,688/group) and secondary MACE prevention (n = 1,258/group) and to assess the risk of NODM (n = 2,391/group), new-onset myalgia or rhabdomyolysis (n = 11,799/group), and hepatotoxicity (AST, n = 4,034/group; ALT, n = 3,655/group). No significant differences were observed in the hazard ratios (HRs) for primary (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59-1.20) and secondary MACE prevention (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68-1.16). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the risk of NODM (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.79-1.23). The risk of new-onset myalgia/rhabdomyolysis (HR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.96) and the incidence of abnormal elevations in AST levels (2.35% vs. 3.37%, p<0.05) were significantly lower in the pravastatin group.
Conclusion: Moderate-intensity pravastatin (40 mg/day) showed comparable effectiveness to moderate-intensity atorvastatin (10 mg/day) in preventing MACE with a more favorable safety profile.