Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Pravastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Common Data Model of Multicenter Electronic Health Records in South Korea.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Sung Wan Chun, Hae Jin Kim, Ji A Seo, Suk Chon, Sung Eun Kim, Jung Hwa Jung, Sang Soo Kim, Hyejin Lee, Sanghoon Shin, So Hun Kim, Dughyun Choi, Hyeong Kyu Park, Soo-Kyung Kim, Ji-Hwan Bae, In-Kyung Jeong
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Pravastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Common Data Model of Multicenter Electronic Health Records in South Korea.","authors":"Sung Wan Chun, Hae Jin Kim, Ji A Seo, Suk Chon, Sung Eun Kim, Jung Hwa Jung, Sang Soo Kim, Hyejin Lee, Sanghoon Shin, So Hun Kim, Dughyun Choi, Hyeong Kyu Park, Soo-Kyung Kim, Ji-Hwan Bae, In-Kyung Jeong","doi":"10.5551/jat.65345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity pravastatin 40 mg/day and atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with dyslipidemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of 19 million patients across 14 secondary/tertiary hospitals, standardized to a Common Data Model. New users of pravastatin (40 mg/day) and atorvastatin (10 mg/day) were identified. Six distinct cohorts were used to assess the comparative effectiveness in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the risks of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), myalgia or rhabdomyolysis, and hepatotoxicity (measured by aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/alanine aminotransferase [ALT]). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to each cohort for effectiveness and safety analyses, followed by a meta-analysis of hospital-specific results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, patients were equally assigned to the pravastatin and atorvastatin groups for primary (n = 2,688/group) and secondary MACE prevention (n = 1,258/group) and to assess the risk of NODM (n = 2,391/group), new-onset myalgia or rhabdomyolysis (n = 11,799/group), and hepatotoxicity (AST, n = 4,034/group; ALT, n = 3,655/group). No significant differences were observed in the hazard ratios (HRs) for primary (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59-1.20) and secondary MACE prevention (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68-1.16). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the risk of NODM (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.79-1.23). The risk of new-onset myalgia/rhabdomyolysis (HR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.96) and the incidence of abnormal elevations in AST levels (2.35% vs. 3.37%, p<0.05) were significantly lower in the pravastatin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate-intensity pravastatin (40 mg/day) showed comparable effectiveness to moderate-intensity atorvastatin (10 mg/day) in preventing MACE with a more favorable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":15128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.65345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity pravastatin 40 mg/day and atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with dyslipidemia.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of 19 million patients across 14 secondary/tertiary hospitals, standardized to a Common Data Model. New users of pravastatin (40 mg/day) and atorvastatin (10 mg/day) were identified. Six distinct cohorts were used to assess the comparative effectiveness in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the risks of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), myalgia or rhabdomyolysis, and hepatotoxicity (measured by aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/alanine aminotransferase [ALT]). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to each cohort for effectiveness and safety analyses, followed by a meta-analysis of hospital-specific results.

Results: After PSM, patients were equally assigned to the pravastatin and atorvastatin groups for primary (n = 2,688/group) and secondary MACE prevention (n = 1,258/group) and to assess the risk of NODM (n = 2,391/group), new-onset myalgia or rhabdomyolysis (n = 11,799/group), and hepatotoxicity (AST, n = 4,034/group; ALT, n = 3,655/group). No significant differences were observed in the hazard ratios (HRs) for primary (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59-1.20) and secondary MACE prevention (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68-1.16). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the risk of NODM (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.79-1.23). The risk of new-onset myalgia/rhabdomyolysis (HR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.96) and the incidence of abnormal elevations in AST levels (2.35% vs. 3.37%, p<0.05) were significantly lower in the pravastatin group.

Conclusion: Moderate-intensity pravastatin (40 mg/day) showed comparable effectiveness to moderate-intensity atorvastatin (10 mg/day) in preventing MACE with a more favorable safety profile.

中等强度普伐他汀与阿托伐他汀治疗血脂异常患者的有效性和安全性比较:一项使用韩国多中心电子健康记录通用数据模型的回顾性队列研究
目的:比较中等强度普伐他汀40mg /d与阿托伐他汀10mg /d治疗血脂异常患者的有效性和安全性。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用了14家二级/三级医院的1900万患者的电子健康记录,并将其标准化为通用数据模型。确定了普伐他汀(40 mg/天)和阿托伐他汀(10 mg/天)的新使用者。采用六个不同的队列来评估在预防主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和新发糖尿病(NODM)、肌痛或横纹肌溶解以及肝毒性(以谷草转氨酶[AST]/丙氨酸转氨酶[ALT]衡量)的风险方面的比较有效性。对每个队列应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行有效性和安全性分析,然后对医院特定结果进行荟萃分析。结果:PSM后,患者被平均分配到普伐他汀和阿托伐他汀组,用于初级(n = 2688 /组)和二级MACE预防(n = 1258 /组),并评估NODM (n = 2391 /组)、新发肌痛或横纹肌溶解(n = 11799 /组)和肝毒性(n = 4034 /组)的风险;ALT, n = 3,655/组)。原发性疾病的危险比(HR = 0.84;95% CI, 0.59-1.20)和二级MACE预防(HR = 0.89;95% ci, 0.68-1.16)。同样,NODM的风险也无显著差异(HR, 0.99;95% ci, 0.79-1.23)。普伐他汀组新发肌痛/横纹肌溶解的风险(HR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69 ~ 0.96)和AST水平异常升高的发生率(2.35% vs. 3.37%, p<0.05)均显著降低。结论:中等强度普伐他汀(40 mg/天)与中等强度阿托伐他汀(10 mg/天)在预防MACE方面的有效性相当,且安全性更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
15.90%
发文量
271
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: JAT publishes articles focused on all aspects of research on atherosclerosis, vascular biology, thrombosis, lipid and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信