Evaluation of the efficacy of M-TAPA and EXORA block application for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, single-blind, observational study.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Korgün Ökmen, Durdu Kahraman Yıldız, Gökberk Kürşat Ülker
{"title":"Evaluation of the efficacy of M-TAPA and EXORA block application for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, single-blind, observational study.","authors":"Korgün Ökmen, Durdu Kahraman Yıldız, Gökberk Kürşat Ülker","doi":"10.4097/kja.24563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different field block methods are used for analgesia following abdominal surgery. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a modified thoracoabdominal nerve block via the perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) and that of an external oblique and rectus abdominis plane (EXORA) block for anterolateral upper abdominal analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 90 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups (n = 30 per group): a control group, which received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV.PCA); an EXORA block group, which received an EXORA block with 0.25% bupivacaine + IV.PCA; and an M-TAPA block group, which received an M-TAPA with 0.25% bupivacaine + IV.PCA. The primary outcome was postoperative pain (at rest and on movement), evaluated using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at 2-, 4-, 6-, 12-, and 24-h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included tramadol use, the side effect profile, dermatomal spread, and additional analgesic use at 12-h and 24-h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NRS scores as well as the mean tramadol consumption at 12-h and 24-h postoperatively were significantly lower in the EXORA and M-TAPA groups than in the control group (all P < 0.001). Sensory block was recorded in the lateral and anterior abdomen from T7 to T11 after both EXORA block and M-TAPA application.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EXORA block and M-TAPA application provided similar levels of analgesia to the upper abdominal wall after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Further data should be obtained from cadaveric and other types of studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different field block methods are used for analgesia following abdominal surgery. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a modified thoracoabdominal nerve block via the perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) and that of an external oblique and rectus abdominis plane (EXORA) block for anterolateral upper abdominal analgesia.

Methods: This study included 90 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups (n = 30 per group): a control group, which received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV.PCA); an EXORA block group, which received an EXORA block with 0.25% bupivacaine + IV.PCA; and an M-TAPA block group, which received an M-TAPA with 0.25% bupivacaine + IV.PCA. The primary outcome was postoperative pain (at rest and on movement), evaluated using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at 2-, 4-, 6-, 12-, and 24-h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included tramadol use, the side effect profile, dermatomal spread, and additional analgesic use at 12-h and 24-h postoperatively.

Results: NRS scores as well as the mean tramadol consumption at 12-h and 24-h postoperatively were significantly lower in the EXORA and M-TAPA groups than in the control group (all P < 0.001). Sensory block was recorded in the lateral and anterior abdomen from T7 to T11 after both EXORA block and M-TAPA application.

Conclusions: EXORA block and M-TAPA application provided similar levels of analgesia to the upper abdominal wall after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Further data should be obtained from cadaveric and other types of studies.

评价M-TAPA和EXORA阻滞应用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛的疗效:一项前瞻性、单盲、观察性研究。
背景:不同的场阻滞方法用于腹部手术后的镇痛。在这项研究中,我们评估了经软骨膜外入路改良胸腹神经阻滞(M-TAPA)和腹外斜直肌平面阻滞(EXORA)对上腹部前外侧镇痛的疗效。方法:本研究纳入90例腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者。将患者分为三组(每组30例):对照组采用静脉自控镇痛(IV.PCA);EXORA阻滞组,接受0.25%布比卡因+ IV.PCA的EXORA阻滞;M-TAPA阻断组,M-TAPA加0.25%布比卡因+ IV.PCA。主要结果是术后疼痛(休息和运动时),在术后2、4、6、12和24小时使用数值评定量表(NRS)评分进行评估。次要结局包括曲马多的使用、副作用、皮皮扩散和术后12小时和24小时额外的止痛药使用。结果:EXORA组和M-TAPA组术后12 h和24 h的NRS评分及曲马多平均用量均显著低于对照组(P < 0.001)。EXORA阻滞和M-TAPA应用后,在T7至T11的外侧和前腹部记录感觉阻滞。结论:EXORA阻滞和M-TAPA应用对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后上腹壁的镇痛效果相似。进一步的数据应从尸体和其他类型的研究中获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信