The systemic and kidney hemodynamic response to empagliflozin, losartan and their combination varies between individuals.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Britt Eveline Wever, Rosalie Annemien Scholtes, Charlotte Michelle Mosterd, Anne Clasien Hesp, Mark Martinus Smits, Hiddo Jan Lambers Heerspink, Daniël Henri van Raalte
{"title":"The systemic and kidney hemodynamic response to empagliflozin, losartan and their combination varies between individuals.","authors":"Britt Eveline Wever, Rosalie Annemien Scholtes, Charlotte Michelle Mosterd, Anne Clasien Hesp, Mark Martinus Smits, Hiddo Jan Lambers Heerspink, Daniël Henri van Raalte","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02289-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and sodium glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) are known for their kidney protective properties, but both show significant residual risk in large outcome trials. In these trials, SGLT2i were introduced on top of RASi; the individual response to each drug is currently unclear. We therefore aimed to investigate the individual reactions to the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) losartan and the SGLT2i empagliflozin and their combination on measured GFR (mGFR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind, randomized, 4-armed, crossover study, 24 participants received 7 days of empagliflozin 10 mg once daily, losartan 50 mg once daily, combination therapy or matching placebo. We visualized individual drug response variability. We further explored predictors of mGFR and SBP changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During empagliflozin administration, a greater than 10% reduction in mGFR was observed in 26% of participants receiving empagliflozin, in 30% of those receiving losartan, and in 39% among participants on combination therapy. In comparison, a greater than 10% reduction in SBP was observed in 35% of participants on empagliflozin, in 39% of those receiving losartan and in 43% on combination therapy. A large part of the participants who did not respond to one drug, did respond to the other drug or their combination. Monotherapy SGLT2i did not correlate with monotherapy ARB in mGFR change or SBP change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data show large individual variability in response to treatment with the ARB losartan and the SGLT2i empagliflozin. Clinicians should monitor treatment responses in patients and consider switching from one kidney protective drug to another in non-responders.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02289-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and sodium glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) are known for their kidney protective properties, but both show significant residual risk in large outcome trials. In these trials, SGLT2i were introduced on top of RASi; the individual response to each drug is currently unclear. We therefore aimed to investigate the individual reactions to the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) losartan and the SGLT2i empagliflozin and their combination on measured GFR (mGFR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP).

Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, 4-armed, crossover study, 24 participants received 7 days of empagliflozin 10 mg once daily, losartan 50 mg once daily, combination therapy or matching placebo. We visualized individual drug response variability. We further explored predictors of mGFR and SBP changes.

Results: During empagliflozin administration, a greater than 10% reduction in mGFR was observed in 26% of participants receiving empagliflozin, in 30% of those receiving losartan, and in 39% among participants on combination therapy. In comparison, a greater than 10% reduction in SBP was observed in 35% of participants on empagliflozin, in 39% of those receiving losartan and in 43% on combination therapy. A large part of the participants who did not respond to one drug, did respond to the other drug or their combination. Monotherapy SGLT2i did not correlate with monotherapy ARB in mGFR change or SBP change.

Conclusions: Our data show large individual variability in response to treatment with the ARB losartan and the SGLT2i empagliflozin. Clinicians should monitor treatment responses in patients and consider switching from one kidney protective drug to another in non-responders.

恩格列净、氯沙坦及其联合用药的全身和肾脏血流动力学反应因人而异。
背景:肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)和葡萄糖共转运蛋白钠抑制剂(SGLT2i)以其肾脏保护特性而闻名,但在大型结局试验中均显示出显著的残留风险。在这些试验中,SGLT2i被引入RASi之上;个体对每种药物的反应目前尚不清楚。因此,我们的目的是研究血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)氯沙坦和SGLT2i依格列净的个体反应以及它们对GFR (mGFR)和收缩压(SBP)的测量。方法:在这项双盲、随机、四组交叉研究中,24名参与者接受了7天的恩格列净10mg每日一次,氯沙坦50mg每日一次,联合治疗或匹配安慰剂。我们可视化了个体药物反应的可变性。我们进一步探讨了mGFR和收缩压变化的预测因素。结果:在给予恩帕列净期间,26%的接受恩帕列净的参与者,30%接受氯沙坦的参与者和39%接受联合治疗的参与者中观察到mGFR降低超过10%。相比之下,35%的恩格列净组、39%的氯沙坦组和43%的联合治疗组的收缩压降低超过10%。大部分对一种药物没有反应的参与者,对另一种药物或它们的组合有反应。单药治疗SGLT2i与单药治疗ARB在mGFR变化或收缩压变化方面没有相关性。结论:我们的数据显示ARB氯沙坦和SGLT2i恩格列净治疗的反应有很大的个体差异。临床医生应监测患者的治疗反应,并考虑从一种肾脏保护药物切换到另一种无反应的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信