Differential effects of antidepressants on cognition in Alzheimer's disease with depression: A sub-group analysis of an open-label, observational study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Eduardo Cumbo, Daniela Migliore
{"title":"Differential effects of antidepressants on cognition in Alzheimer's disease with depression: A sub-group analysis of an open-label, observational study.","authors":"Eduardo Cumbo, Daniela Migliore","doi":"10.1177/13872877251340084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDepressive symptoms are common in Alzheimer's disease (AD), leading to an increasing use of antidepressants.ObjectiveTo compare the effects of vortioxetine with other conventional antidepressants on cognition in AD patients with depressive symptoms.MethodsThis analysis is a subgroup of a 12-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study involving 108 outpatients receiving either vortioxetine or escitalopram, paroxetine, or bupropion as part of routine care. Data were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Cognitive symptoms were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Attentive Matrices (AM), Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPR), and Digit Span; depressive symptoms using the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD). Results for patients on vortioxetine were compared to those on other antidepressants.ResultsTotal scores on cognitive measures improved in all groups. Improvements versus baseline in MMSE, AM, and CPM were statistically significant in the vortioxetine group (p < 0.001), but not in the other antidepressant groups. Digit Span scores did not differ significantly from baseline. The between-group differences in MMSE, AM, and CPM changes were statistically significant in favor of vortioxetine (p < 0.05), while the Digit Span change showed a trend towards superiority with vortioxetine, but did not reach statistical significance. The between-group differences in HAM-D and CSDD changes were also statistically significant for vortioxetine (p < 0.05).ConclusionsVortioxetine was superior in improving both cognitive and depressive symptoms compared to other antidepressants. Larger studies which may also help to understand whether the beneficial effect observed with vortioxetine was a direct effect or mediated by its specific antidepressant efficacy are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251340084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251340084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDepressive symptoms are common in Alzheimer's disease (AD), leading to an increasing use of antidepressants.ObjectiveTo compare the effects of vortioxetine with other conventional antidepressants on cognition in AD patients with depressive symptoms.MethodsThis analysis is a subgroup of a 12-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study involving 108 outpatients receiving either vortioxetine or escitalopram, paroxetine, or bupropion as part of routine care. Data were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Cognitive symptoms were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Attentive Matrices (AM), Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPR), and Digit Span; depressive symptoms using the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD). Results for patients on vortioxetine were compared to those on other antidepressants.ResultsTotal scores on cognitive measures improved in all groups. Improvements versus baseline in MMSE, AM, and CPM were statistically significant in the vortioxetine group (p < 0.001), but not in the other antidepressant groups. Digit Span scores did not differ significantly from baseline. The between-group differences in MMSE, AM, and CPM changes were statistically significant in favor of vortioxetine (p < 0.05), while the Digit Span change showed a trend towards superiority with vortioxetine, but did not reach statistical significance. The between-group differences in HAM-D and CSDD changes were also statistically significant for vortioxetine (p < 0.05).ConclusionsVortioxetine was superior in improving both cognitive and depressive symptoms compared to other antidepressants. Larger studies which may also help to understand whether the beneficial effect observed with vortioxetine was a direct effect or mediated by its specific antidepressant efficacy are required.

抗抑郁药对阿尔茨海默病合并抑郁症患者认知的不同影响:一项开放标签观察性研究的亚组分析
抑郁症状在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中很常见,导致抗抑郁药的使用增加。目的比较沃替西汀与其他常规抗抑郁药对伴有抑郁症状的AD患者认知功能的影响。该分析是一项为期12个月的前瞻性、随机、开放标签、平行组研究的一个亚组,该研究包括108名门诊患者,他们接受沃替西汀或艾司西酞普兰、帕罗西汀或安非他酮作为常规护理的一部分。在基线、6个月和12个月收集数据。认知症状通过简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、注意矩阵(AM)、彩色渐进矩阵(CPR)和数字广度进行评估;使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)和康奈尔痴呆抑郁量表(CSDD)对抑郁症状进行评估。将使用沃替西汀的患者与使用其他抗抑郁药的患者进行比较。结果两组患者认知功能总分均有提高。与基线相比,沃替西汀组MMSE、AM和CPM的改善具有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信