Creating a Practical Tool for Predicting Major Amputation Rate in Patients With Diabetic Hindfoot Ulcers: Focus on Ischemia and Infection.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ye-Won Choi, Seung-Kyu Han, Seong-Ho Jeong, Eun-Sang Dhong
{"title":"Creating a Practical Tool for Predicting Major Amputation Rate in Patients With Diabetic Hindfoot Ulcers: Focus on Ischemia and Infection.","authors":"Ye-Won Choi, Seung-Kyu Han, Seong-Ho Jeong, Eun-Sang Dhong","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with diabetic hindfoot ulcers typically harbor significant concerns regarding their prospects for healing or the potential for major amputation. Nonetheless, a scarcity of data addressing this prevalent and critical query exists. Thus, the aim of this study was to create an initial risk-scoring system to forecast the prognosis of individuals with diabetic hindfoot ulcers, leveraging assessments of ischemia and infection severity, which are recognized as the principal risk factors for amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ischemia severity was categorized as iS0, iS1, or iS2 based on transcutaneous partial oxygen tension values, while infection severity was classified as iN0, iN1, or iN2 according to the results of tissue and bone biopsy cultures. Risk scores were determined by summing the scores for ischemia and infection severity, yielding a range of 0 to 4. Wound healing outcomes were graded as either healed with or without major amputation. Wound healing outcomes were assessed based on the assigned risk scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With ascending risk scores, the proportion of patients subjected to major amputation also increased (<i>P</i> value for trend < 0.001). Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between escalating risk scores and major amputation incidence. Patients with a risk score of 4 exhibited a 41-fold higher likelihood of undergoing major amputation compared to those with a risk score of 0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk scores can serve as a reliable predictor of the major amputation rate in patients with diabetic hindfoot ulcers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"40 17","pages":"e55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e55","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with diabetic hindfoot ulcers typically harbor significant concerns regarding their prospects for healing or the potential for major amputation. Nonetheless, a scarcity of data addressing this prevalent and critical query exists. Thus, the aim of this study was to create an initial risk-scoring system to forecast the prognosis of individuals with diabetic hindfoot ulcers, leveraging assessments of ischemia and infection severity, which are recognized as the principal risk factors for amputation.

Methods: Ischemia severity was categorized as iS0, iS1, or iS2 based on transcutaneous partial oxygen tension values, while infection severity was classified as iN0, iN1, or iN2 according to the results of tissue and bone biopsy cultures. Risk scores were determined by summing the scores for ischemia and infection severity, yielding a range of 0 to 4. Wound healing outcomes were graded as either healed with or without major amputation. Wound healing outcomes were assessed based on the assigned risk scores.

Results: With ascending risk scores, the proportion of patients subjected to major amputation also increased (P value for trend < 0.001). Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between escalating risk scores and major amputation incidence. Patients with a risk score of 4 exhibited a 41-fold higher likelihood of undergoing major amputation compared to those with a risk score of 0.

Conclusion: Risk scores can serve as a reliable predictor of the major amputation rate in patients with diabetic hindfoot ulcers.

创建一个预测糖尿病后足溃疡患者主要截肢率的实用工具:关注缺血和感染。
背景:糖尿病后足溃疡患者通常对其愈合前景或大截肢的可能性怀有重大担忧。尽管如此,解决这一普遍而关键的问题的数据仍然稀缺。因此,本研究的目的是建立一个初步的风险评分系统,利用缺血和感染严重程度的评估来预测糖尿病后足溃疡患者的预后,这被认为是截肢的主要危险因素。方法:根据经皮局部氧张力值将缺血严重程度分为iS0、iS1或iS2,根据组织和骨活检结果将感染严重程度分为iN0、iN1或iN2。风险评分是通过将缺血和感染严重程度的评分相加来确定的,得到0到4的范围。伤口愈合的结果分为有或没有主要截肢的愈合。根据指定的风险评分评估伤口愈合结果。结果:随着风险评分的升高,接受大截肢的患者比例也增加(趋势P值< 0.001)。单变量logistic回归分析显示风险评分升高与严重截肢发生率显著正相关。与风险评分为0的患者相比,风险评分为4的患者进行主要截肢的可能性高出41倍。结论:风险评分可作为糖尿病后足溃疡患者主要截肢率的可靠预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信