Associations Between Pain Scores and Opioid Doses With Emergency Department Disposition and Return Visit Rates in Children With Sickle Cell Disease.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Keli D Coleman, Kenneth McKinley, Angela M Ellison, Elizabeth R Alpern, Selena Hariharan, Irina Topoz, Morgan Wurtz, Blake Nielsen, Lawrence J Cook, Claudia R Morris, Amanda M Brandow, Andrew D Campbell, Robert I Liem, Rachelle Nuss, Charles T Quinn, Alexis A Thompson, Anthony Villella, Allison A King, Ana Baumann, Warren Frankenberger, David C Brousseau
{"title":"Associations Between Pain Scores and Opioid Doses With Emergency Department Disposition and Return Visit Rates in Children With Sickle Cell Disease.","authors":"Keli D Coleman, Kenneth McKinley, Angela M Ellison, Elizabeth R Alpern, Selena Hariharan, Irina Topoz, Morgan Wurtz, Blake Nielsen, Lawrence J Cook, Claudia R Morris, Amanda M Brandow, Andrew D Campbell, Robert I Liem, Rachelle Nuss, Charles T Quinn, Alexis A Thompson, Anthony Villella, Allison A King, Ana Baumann, Warren Frankenberger, David C Brousseau","doi":"10.1002/pbc.31750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid treatment and frequent reassessment of pain are key components of treatment guidelines for acute sickle cell disease (SCD) pain. Few studies, however, report the associations between emergency department (ED) pain scores, number of ED opioid doses, receipt of an opioid prescription, ED visit disposition, or ED return visits. This seven-site retrospective cohort study analyzed 4983 ED visits by children with SCD pain using electronic health record data from the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry. ED pain scores included initial, last, and change in scores (initial minus last), measured on a 0-10 scale. Dispositions of discharge and hospital admission were included. Modified Poisson regression and the Cochran-Armitage test of trend were used for analysis. The median (IQR) initial pain score was 8.0 (6-10); last pain score was 5.0 (2-8); and median decrease was 2.0 (0-5). In multivariable analysis, last pain score was the best predictor of disposition. For the return visit analyses, of the 2377 visits discharged at index ED visit, 29% returned within 14 days. Higher initial and last ED pain scores were associated with increased return visits. Children with no opioid discharge prescription and ≥3 ED opioid doses had a return visit rate of 36% compared to 22% if the child received an opioid prescription and only one ED opioid. Increasing discharge opioid prescriptions and targeting interventions for those who receive multiple ED opioid doses could decrease return visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":19822,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"e31750"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.31750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid treatment and frequent reassessment of pain are key components of treatment guidelines for acute sickle cell disease (SCD) pain. Few studies, however, report the associations between emergency department (ED) pain scores, number of ED opioid doses, receipt of an opioid prescription, ED visit disposition, or ED return visits. This seven-site retrospective cohort study analyzed 4983 ED visits by children with SCD pain using electronic health record data from the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry. ED pain scores included initial, last, and change in scores (initial minus last), measured on a 0-10 scale. Dispositions of discharge and hospital admission were included. Modified Poisson regression and the Cochran-Armitage test of trend were used for analysis. The median (IQR) initial pain score was 8.0 (6-10); last pain score was 5.0 (2-8); and median decrease was 2.0 (0-5). In multivariable analysis, last pain score was the best predictor of disposition. For the return visit analyses, of the 2377 visits discharged at index ED visit, 29% returned within 14 days. Higher initial and last ED pain scores were associated with increased return visits. Children with no opioid discharge prescription and ≥3 ED opioid doses had a return visit rate of 36% compared to 22% if the child received an opioid prescription and only one ED opioid. Increasing discharge opioid prescriptions and targeting interventions for those who receive multiple ED opioid doses could decrease return visits.

镰状细胞病儿童疼痛评分和阿片类药物剂量与急诊科处置和复诊率之间的关系
快速治疗和频繁重新评估疼痛是急性镰状细胞病(SCD)疼痛治疗指南的关键组成部分。然而,很少有研究报道急诊科(ED)疼痛评分、ED阿片类药物剂量、阿片类药物处方的接收、ED就诊处置或ED回访之间的关系。这项7个站点的回顾性队列研究分析了4983例SCD疼痛患儿的ED就诊,使用的是儿科急诊应用研究网络登记处的电子健康记录数据。ED疼痛评分包括初始、最后和评分变化(初始减去最后),评分范围为0-10。包括出院和住院的处置。采用修正泊松回归和cochrana - armitage趋势检验进行分析。初始疼痛评分中位数(IQR)为8.0 (6-10);最后疼痛评分5.0分(2-8分);中位数下降2.0(0-5)。在多变量分析中,最后的疼痛评分是最好的预测因素。在回访分析中,在索引急诊科出院的2377例患者中,29%在14天内复诊。较高的初始和最后ED疼痛评分与回访次数增加有关。无阿片类药物出院处方且ED阿片类药物剂量≥3次的儿童回访率为36%,而接受阿片类药物处方且仅服用一种ED阿片类药物的儿童回访率为22%。增加出院阿片类药物处方和针对那些接受多次ED阿片类药物剂量的患者的针对性干预可以减少回访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Pediatric Blood & Cancer 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Pediatric Blood & Cancer publishes the highest quality manuscripts describing basic and clinical investigations of blood disorders and malignant diseases of childhood including diagnosis, treatment, epidemiology, etiology, biology, and molecular and clinical genetics of these diseases as they affect children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatric Blood & Cancer will also include studies on such treatment options as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunology, and gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信