Comparative and functional anatomy of masticatory muscles and bite force in opossums (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae).

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Anatomical Record Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1002/ar.25675
Juann A F H Abreu, Diego Astúa
{"title":"Comparative and functional anatomy of masticatory muscles and bite force in opossums (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae).","authors":"Juann A F H Abreu, Diego Astúa","doi":"10.1002/ar.25675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opossums (Didelphidae) are American marsupials traditionally known for their generalized morphology and generalist feeding habits. They include a diversity of similar items in their diets, but the proportion of types of items consumed varies between taxa. Thus, feeding ecology shows varying degrees of omnivory or food preference that cannot be distinguished into strict dietary categories. With few exceptions, the anatomical and functional relationship between the masticatory muscles and variation in food resources used in opossums is unknown. Here we provide comparative descriptions of the jaw adductor muscle anatomy and architecture of nine Didelphidae genera. The muscles were dissected, weighed, and chemically digested for separation and measurement of the muscle fascicles. We estimated the potential physiological cross-sectional area (pPCSA) of the muscles and used 2D lever arm mechanics to calculate the potential bite force on the canine and first molar. We tested the allometric relationships of muscle variables and bite forces and the correlation of bite forces with diet and diet mechanical challenge (relative frequency of hard items). The adductor muscles were represented by the m. temporalis and m. masseter, with two layers (superficial and deep) each, and m. pterygoideus medialis across the sample. The m. zygomaticomandibularis was also identified in most genera, except for Didelphis and Lutreolina. Muscle anatomy is conserved but varies in the extent of the attachment areas, in part due to differences in skull morphology. The anatomical diversification and relationships between muscles corresponded to a generalized pattern in most genera, which proved to be efficient for adding different items to the diet. The mass, average fascicle length, and pPCSA of the adductor muscles scaled isometrically with size. Bite forces on the canine and first molar also scaled isometrically and were not correlated with diet or diet mechanical challenge. Therefore, the variation in quantitative myological data and bite force was consistent with size, and the increase in bite force supports dietary diversification associated with increased size in opossums.</p>","PeriodicalId":50793,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.25675","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opossums (Didelphidae) are American marsupials traditionally known for their generalized morphology and generalist feeding habits. They include a diversity of similar items in their diets, but the proportion of types of items consumed varies between taxa. Thus, feeding ecology shows varying degrees of omnivory or food preference that cannot be distinguished into strict dietary categories. With few exceptions, the anatomical and functional relationship between the masticatory muscles and variation in food resources used in opossums is unknown. Here we provide comparative descriptions of the jaw adductor muscle anatomy and architecture of nine Didelphidae genera. The muscles were dissected, weighed, and chemically digested for separation and measurement of the muscle fascicles. We estimated the potential physiological cross-sectional area (pPCSA) of the muscles and used 2D lever arm mechanics to calculate the potential bite force on the canine and first molar. We tested the allometric relationships of muscle variables and bite forces and the correlation of bite forces with diet and diet mechanical challenge (relative frequency of hard items). The adductor muscles were represented by the m. temporalis and m. masseter, with two layers (superficial and deep) each, and m. pterygoideus medialis across the sample. The m. zygomaticomandibularis was also identified in most genera, except for Didelphis and Lutreolina. Muscle anatomy is conserved but varies in the extent of the attachment areas, in part due to differences in skull morphology. The anatomical diversification and relationships between muscles corresponded to a generalized pattern in most genera, which proved to be efficient for adding different items to the diet. The mass, average fascicle length, and pPCSA of the adductor muscles scaled isometrically with size. Bite forces on the canine and first molar also scaled isometrically and were not correlated with diet or diet mechanical challenge. Therefore, the variation in quantitative myological data and bite force was consistent with size, and the increase in bite force supports dietary diversification associated with increased size in opossums.

负鼠咀嚼肌肉和咬合力的比较和功能解剖学(负鼠科,负鼠科)。
负鼠(负鼠科)是美国有袋动物,传统上以其广义的形态和一般的摄食习惯而闻名。它们的饮食中包含多种相似的食物,但所消耗的食物种类的比例因分类群而异。因此,饲养生态学表现出不同程度的杂食性或食物偏好,无法区分为严格的饮食类别。除了少数例外,负鼠咀嚼肌与食物资源变化之间的解剖和功能关系尚不清楚。在这里,我们提供比较描述的颚内收肌解剖结构和结构的九个Didelphidae属。对肌肉进行解剖、称重和化学消化,以分离和测量肌束。我们估计了肌肉的潜在生理横截面积(pPCSA),并使用二维杠杆臂力学计算了犬齿和第一磨牙的潜在咬合力。我们测试了肌肉变量和咬合力的异速关系,以及咬合力与饮食和饮食机械挑战(硬物品的相对频率)的相关性。内收肌由颞肌和咬肌代表,各有两层(浅层和深层),以及翼状内侧肌横跨整个样本。除Didelphis和Lutreolina属外,其余属均有颧缘支原体。肌肉解剖是保守的,但在附着区域的程度上有所不同,部分原因是由于颅骨形态的差异。解剖学上的多样化和肌肉之间的关系符合大多数属的普遍模式,这证明了在饮食中添加不同的食物是有效的。内收肌的质量、平均肌束长度和pPCSA与大小成等距比例。犬齿和第一磨牙的咬合力也呈等距缩放,与饮食或饮食机械挑战无关。因此,定量肌学数据和咬合力的变化与体型一致,而咬合力的增加支持了负鼠饮食多样化与体型增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomical Record
Anatomical Record Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Anatomical Record
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信