Unpacking the post-COVID association between unexpected births and excess deaths.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-16 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2500825
Les Coleman
{"title":"Unpacking the post-COVID association between unexpected births and excess deaths.","authors":"Les Coleman","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2500825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Global fertility has halved since its 1960s peak to be little above the replacement rate, and lower in many developed countries. In addition it has been suggested that excess deaths since the onset of the COVID pandemic may have influenced fertility. Given the economic and social interest in declining fertility, this study seeks an explanation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a sample for 18 mid-large industrialized countries of 30 variables covering vital statistics and health, social and economic data, and determined excess deaths during 2020-2022 and unexpected births during 2022-2024. Analysis estimated the link between COVID excess deaths and subsequent unexpected births; and estimated links between excess deaths and unexpected births and national parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Countries' average birth rate during 2022-2023 was 5-6% below that expected from their trend and mean prior to the spread of COVID-19 in 2020. Birth rates were higher than expected after 2022 in countries which had high excess deaths during 2020-2022. Regression against national parameters traced reductions in post-COVID births to countries' strong economic measures (low unemployment, high GDP per capita), indicators of women's high economic capacity (years at school, female workforce participation), and weak religiosity. Similar analysis identified higher excess deaths in less wealthy countries, and those with weaker social measures and women's opportunities, and poor pre-existing health outcomes (high infant mortality, low life expectancy, fewer physicians).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The association between unexpected births and excess deaths this decade is largely spurious because lower wealth and poor previous health outcomes drove excess deaths, while the opportunity cost of childbearing has accelerated declining births in wealthier countries post-COVID. Better understanding population effects of the pandemic is of broad social and economic interest given declining fertility rates; and change in trajectory of births could prove the pandemic's most serious socio-economic consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"726-733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2500825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Global fertility has halved since its 1960s peak to be little above the replacement rate, and lower in many developed countries. In addition it has been suggested that excess deaths since the onset of the COVID pandemic may have influenced fertility. Given the economic and social interest in declining fertility, this study seeks an explanation.

Methods: We developed a sample for 18 mid-large industrialized countries of 30 variables covering vital statistics and health, social and economic data, and determined excess deaths during 2020-2022 and unexpected births during 2022-2024. Analysis estimated the link between COVID excess deaths and subsequent unexpected births; and estimated links between excess deaths and unexpected births and national parameters.

Results: Countries' average birth rate during 2022-2023 was 5-6% below that expected from their trend and mean prior to the spread of COVID-19 in 2020. Birth rates were higher than expected after 2022 in countries which had high excess deaths during 2020-2022. Regression against national parameters traced reductions in post-COVID births to countries' strong economic measures (low unemployment, high GDP per capita), indicators of women's high economic capacity (years at school, female workforce participation), and weak religiosity. Similar analysis identified higher excess deaths in less wealthy countries, and those with weaker social measures and women's opportunities, and poor pre-existing health outcomes (high infant mortality, low life expectancy, fewer physicians).

Conclusion: The association between unexpected births and excess deaths this decade is largely spurious because lower wealth and poor previous health outcomes drove excess deaths, while the opportunity cost of childbearing has accelerated declining births in wealthier countries post-COVID. Better understanding population effects of the pandemic is of broad social and economic interest given declining fertility rates; and change in trajectory of births could prove the pandemic's most serious socio-economic consequences.

揭示新冠肺炎后意外出生与超额死亡之间的关联。
目标:自20世纪60年代的峰值以来,全球生育率已经减半,仅略高于更替率,许多发达国家的生育率更低。此外,还有人认为,自新冠肺炎大流行爆发以来,死亡人数过多可能影响了生育率。考虑到生育率下降带来的经济和社会利益,本研究寻求一个解释。方法:我们对18个中大型工业化国家的30个变量进行了抽样,包括生命统计和健康、社会和经济数据,并确定了2020-2022年期间的超额死亡人数和2022-2024年期间的意外出生人数。分析估计了Covid超额死亡与随后的意外出生之间的联系;并估计了超额死亡和意外出生之间的联系以及国家参数。结果:各国在2022-2023年期间的平均出生率比预期的趋势和2020年新冠病毒传播前的平均值低5- 6%。在2020-2022年期间死亡率高的国家,2022年之后的出生率高于预期。针对国家参数的回归显示,covid - 19后出生人数减少的原因包括各国强有力的经济措施(低失业率、高人均GDP)、妇女高经济能力指标(受教育年限、女性劳动力参与率)和宗教信仰薄弱。类似的分析发现,在较不富裕的国家、社会措施和妇女机会较弱的国家以及先前健康状况较差的国家(婴儿死亡率高、预期寿命低、医生较少),超额死亡率较高。结论:本十年意外出生与超额死亡之间的关联在很大程度上是虚假的,因为较低的财富和较差的先前健康结果导致了超额死亡,而生育的机会成本加速了富裕国家在covid后的出生率下降。鉴于生育率下降,更好地了解大流行病对人口的影响具有广泛的社会和经济利益;出生轨迹的变化可能证明这一流行病最严重的社会经济后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信