Anastasiya S Borisenko, Valentin I Sharobaro, Alexey E Avdeev, Yousif M Ahmed Alsheikh
{"title":"Docking Methods for Robot-assisted Rhytidectomy and Platysmaplasty.","authors":"Anastasiya S Borisenko, Valentin I Sharobaro, Alexey E Avdeev, Yousif M Ahmed Alsheikh","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the development of robotic surgery has been rapidly evolving as well as the interest in their use due to the advantages they provide, such as precision in dissection, the ability to magnify the visualization of the operative field up to 20:1, and the ability to operate in hard-to-reach areas that otherwise cannot be achieved using the traditional methods. Research is being published constantly on the utilization of such robots within the fields of general surgery, oncology, and urology, with few cases in maxillofacial surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There are no docking algorithms or methods for plastic surgery operations, especially those involving the head and neck area. In this article, we explore different docking methods with da Vinci Si, Xi, and 5 surgical systems for aesthetic facial and neck surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the multiple different techniques used highlighted a few possible access points, whereas others were deemed impractical due to certain limitations such as the limited maneuverability of the robot's arms, the angles required for safe access, and the patient's body limiting the movement of the robot. Da Vinci 5 comes with significant advantages compared with its predecessors due to its novel and improved technologies, such as force feedback technology and artificial intelligence greatly enhancing the robot's usability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic surgery is a viable operative method that is beneficial for improving the outcomes when using the appropriate docking methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6733"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the development of robotic surgery has been rapidly evolving as well as the interest in their use due to the advantages they provide, such as precision in dissection, the ability to magnify the visualization of the operative field up to 20:1, and the ability to operate in hard-to-reach areas that otherwise cannot be achieved using the traditional methods. Research is being published constantly on the utilization of such robots within the fields of general surgery, oncology, and urology, with few cases in maxillofacial surgery.
Methods: There are no docking algorithms or methods for plastic surgery operations, especially those involving the head and neck area. In this article, we explore different docking methods with da Vinci Si, Xi, and 5 surgical systems for aesthetic facial and neck surgery.
Results: The results of the multiple different techniques used highlighted a few possible access points, whereas others were deemed impractical due to certain limitations such as the limited maneuverability of the robot's arms, the angles required for safe access, and the patient's body limiting the movement of the robot. Da Vinci 5 comes with significant advantages compared with its predecessors due to its novel and improved technologies, such as force feedback technology and artificial intelligence greatly enhancing the robot's usability.
Conclusions: Robotic surgery is a viable operative method that is beneficial for improving the outcomes when using the appropriate docking methods.
期刊介绍：
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
