Autonomy in children and adolescents with visual impairment: Validation of the Visual Impairment Developmental Autonomy scale.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Federica Morelli, Serena Grumi, Guido Catalano, Ilaria Scognamillo, Maria Eleonora Reffo, Roberta Zumiani, Sandra Strazzer, Elena Cocchi, Livio Provenzi, Sabrina Signorini
{"title":"Autonomy in children and adolescents with visual impairment: Validation of the Visual Impairment Developmental Autonomy scale.","authors":"Federica Morelli, Serena Grumi, Guido Catalano, Ilaria Scognamillo, Maria Eleonora Reffo, Roberta Zumiani, Sandra Strazzer, Elena Cocchi, Livio Provenzi, Sabrina Signorini","doi":"10.1111/dmcn.16326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To validate the Visual Impairment Developmental Autonomy (VIDA) scale, a questionnaire to assess the autonomy level of children with visual impairment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The primary outcome measures included internal consistency, convergent validity, cross-informant concordance, and descriptive statistics of autonomy profiles across three age groups (age 3-5 years; age 6-10 years; age 11-18 years). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. Convergent validity was evaluated against established measures such as the TNO-AZL Children's Quality of Life questionnaire (TACQOL) and the TNO-AZL Preschool Children's Quality of Life questionnaire (TAPQOL) using bivariate Pearson's correlation indexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency coefficients ranged between 0.708 and 0.938 across all subscales and age versions of the instrument. The VIDA subscales showed consistent correlations with comparable dimensions of the TACQOL/TAPQOL (correlations index >0.3). The cross-informant concordance was significant with weak-to-moderate effect sizes. Descriptive statistics showed different profiles of autonomy in the three age groups: clothing and orientation/mobility emerged as areas of vulnerability for adolescents. Visual acuity was significantly correlated with many VIDA scale scores, whereas no significant associations emerged with the quality of life.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The VIDA scale is effective and reliable in providing both insights on the actual needs of children and quantitative measures of the visual impairment impact on everyday life. Autonomy level affects quality of life, whereas visual impairment does not.</p>","PeriodicalId":50587,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To validate the Visual Impairment Developmental Autonomy (VIDA) scale, a questionnaire to assess the autonomy level of children with visual impairment.

Method: The primary outcome measures included internal consistency, convergent validity, cross-informant concordance, and descriptive statistics of autonomy profiles across three age groups (age 3-5 years; age 6-10 years; age 11-18 years). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. Convergent validity was evaluated against established measures such as the TNO-AZL Children's Quality of Life questionnaire (TACQOL) and the TNO-AZL Preschool Children's Quality of Life questionnaire (TAPQOL) using bivariate Pearson's correlation indexes.

Results: Internal consistency coefficients ranged between 0.708 and 0.938 across all subscales and age versions of the instrument. The VIDA subscales showed consistent correlations with comparable dimensions of the TACQOL/TAPQOL (correlations index >0.3). The cross-informant concordance was significant with weak-to-moderate effect sizes. Descriptive statistics showed different profiles of autonomy in the three age groups: clothing and orientation/mobility emerged as areas of vulnerability for adolescents. Visual acuity was significantly correlated with many VIDA scale scores, whereas no significant associations emerged with the quality of life.

Interpretation: The VIDA scale is effective and reliable in providing both insights on the actual needs of children and quantitative measures of the visual impairment impact on everyday life. Autonomy level affects quality of life, whereas visual impairment does not.

儿童和青少年视觉障碍的自主性:视觉障碍发展自主性量表的验证。
目的:验证视障儿童发展自主性量表(VIDA)的有效性。方法:主要结果测量包括内部一致性、收敛效度、交叉信息一致性和三个年龄组(3-5岁;6-10岁;11-18岁)。采用Cronbach’s Alpha系数评价内部一致性。采用双变量Pearson相关指数对TNO-AZL儿童生活质量问卷(TACQOL)和TNO-AZL学龄前儿童生活质量问卷(TAPQOL)进行收敛效度评估。结果:所有量表和年龄版本的内部一致性系数在0.708 ~ 0.938之间。VIDA子量表与TACQOL/TAPQOL的可比维度具有一致的相关性(相关指数>0.3)。交叉信息的一致性在弱到中等效应量上是显著的。描述性统计数据显示,三个年龄组的自主情况各不相同:服装和取向/行动能力成为青少年易受伤害的领域。视力与许多VIDA量表得分显著相关,而与生活质量无显著关联。解释:VIDA量表在提供对儿童实际需求的见解和对视力障碍对日常生活影响的定量测量方面是有效和可靠的。自主水平会影响生活质量,而视力障碍不会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
13.20%
发文量
338
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to publish Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN), a Mac Keith Press publication and official journal of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) and the British Paediatric Neurology Association (BPNA). For over 50 years, DMCN has defined the field of paediatric neurology and neurodisability and is one of the world’s leading journals in the whole field of paediatrics. DMCN disseminates a range of information worldwide to improve the lives of disabled children and their families. The high quality of published articles is maintained by expert review, including independent statistical assessment, before acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信