Sociolinguistic monitoring and L2 speakers of English.

IF 1.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Linguistics Pub Date : 2024-09-20 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1515/ling-2023-0073
Jana Pflaeging, Bradley Mackay, Erik Schleef
{"title":"Sociolinguistic monitoring and L2 speakers of English.","authors":"Jana Pflaeging, Bradley Mackay, Erik Schleef","doi":"10.1515/ling-2023-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study contributes to a growing body of research on the social meanings of linguistic variation with particular interest in the cognitive processes governing their emergence. Our research follows in the tradition of Labov et al.'s (2011) work on the sociolinguistic monitor, a cognitive mechanism hypothesized to track quantitative linguistic variation and prompt social evaluations (Labov et al. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. <i>Journal of Sociolinguistics</i> 15(4). 431-463). Previous research shows that L1 English listeners are sensitive to frequency variation, but it is unclear whether this also applies to L2 listeners. This study thus replicates Labov et al.'s (2011) original experiment in a context where English is primarily acquired through L2 instruction. To test the generality of <i>sociolinguistic monitoring</i>, we investigate L2 listeners' sensitivity to quantitative differences in sociolinguistic variation (ing) as well as proficiency-based variation. Since participants were L1 speakers of (Austrian) German, we tested evaluations of varying realizations of /θ/ ([θ]/[s]), /d/ ([d]/[t]), and /w/ ([w]/[v]). Experiments included 135 participants, who rated several versions of newscaster test passages regarding <i>professionalism</i>. Our data shows that both sociolinguistic and proficiency-based variation are monitored and evaluated by L2 listeners, albeit to different extents. This supports the assumption that the focus of the monitoring process is <i>socially meaningful variation</i> that includes L1 sociolinguistic but also L2 proficiency-based features.</p>","PeriodicalId":47548,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics","volume":"63 3","pages":"607-638"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2023-0073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study contributes to a growing body of research on the social meanings of linguistic variation with particular interest in the cognitive processes governing their emergence. Our research follows in the tradition of Labov et al.'s (2011) work on the sociolinguistic monitor, a cognitive mechanism hypothesized to track quantitative linguistic variation and prompt social evaluations (Labov et al. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4). 431-463). Previous research shows that L1 English listeners are sensitive to frequency variation, but it is unclear whether this also applies to L2 listeners. This study thus replicates Labov et al.'s (2011) original experiment in a context where English is primarily acquired through L2 instruction. To test the generality of sociolinguistic monitoring, we investigate L2 listeners' sensitivity to quantitative differences in sociolinguistic variation (ing) as well as proficiency-based variation. Since participants were L1 speakers of (Austrian) German, we tested evaluations of varying realizations of /θ/ ([θ]/[s]), /d/ ([d]/[t]), and /w/ ([w]/[v]). Experiments included 135 participants, who rated several versions of newscaster test passages regarding professionalism. Our data shows that both sociolinguistic and proficiency-based variation are monitored and evaluated by L2 listeners, albeit to different extents. This supports the assumption that the focus of the monitoring process is socially meaningful variation that includes L1 sociolinguistic but also L2 proficiency-based features.

社会语言学监测和第二语言英语使用者。
这项研究促进了对语言变异的社会意义的研究,特别是对控制其出现的认知过程的兴趣。我们的研究遵循了Labov et al.(2011)在社会语言学监测方面的传统,这是一种假设的认知机制,用于跟踪定量语言变化并提示社会评估(Labov et al. 2011)。社会语言学监测者的特性。社会语言学杂志15(4)。431 - 463)。先前的研究表明,母语英语的听众对频率变化很敏感,但尚不清楚这是否也适用于第二语言的听众。因此,本研究在英语主要通过第二语言教学习得的背景下复制了Labov等人(2011)的原始实验。为了检验社会语言监测的普遍性,我们调查了二语听者对社会语言变异和基于熟练程度的变异的数量差异的敏感性。由于参与者是母语为(奥地利)德语的人,我们测试了对/θ/ ([θ]/[s])、/d/ ([d]/[t])和/w/ ([w]/[v])的不同实现的评估。实验包括135名参与者,他们对几个版本的新闻播报员测试文章的专业性进行了评分。我们的数据表明,社会语言学和基于熟练程度的差异都受到第二语言听者的监测和评估,尽管程度不同。这支持了一种假设,即监测过程的重点是社会意义变化,包括第一语言社会语言学特征,也包括第二语言熟练度特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Linguistics
Linguistics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Linguistics publishes articles in the traditional subdisciplines of linguistics as well as in neighboring disciplines insofar as these are deemed to be of interest to linguists and other students of natural language. This includes grammar, both functional and formal, with a focus on morphology, syntax, and semantics, pragmatics and discourse, phonetics and phonology, psycholinguistics, and sociolinguistics. The focus may be on one or several languages, but studies with a wide crosslinguistic (typological) coverage are also welcome. The perspective may be synchronic or diachronic. Linguistics also publishes up to two special issues a year in these areas, for which it welcomes proposals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信