Aminotransferase levels in clinical practice - what is normal?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000001094
Jad Allam, Don C Rockey
{"title":"Aminotransferase levels in clinical practice - what is normal?","authors":"Jad Allam, Don C Rockey","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000001094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>No universal consensus exists as to what the upper limit of normal for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) should be. The purpose of this review is to provide insight on the wide variation in the upper limit of normal for ALT, and to highlight key elements resulting in these differences. We also wish to point to potential solutions for standardizing the upper limit of normal.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There are considerable differences in the values for what constitutes a 'normal' ALT serum concentration set by laboratories, and reference values may vary two-fold between different institutions (from 30 to 60 U/l). Key reasons for this include using markedly different reference populations to establish the bounds of normal, and differences in analyzers and assays used to quantify ALT levels. A number of studies have attempted to re-evaluate the upper limit of normal and propose new cut-offs that would allow better detection of liver disease.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The upper limit of normal for ALT continues to vary from one laboratory to another. Despite ongoing efforts, there is still an unmet demand to standardize ALT reference ranges, which is critical for clinical practice. More rigorous inclusion criteria for reference population studies and harmonization in analyzer differences is required to standardize ALT reference ranges universally.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"260-264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: No universal consensus exists as to what the upper limit of normal for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) should be. The purpose of this review is to provide insight on the wide variation in the upper limit of normal for ALT, and to highlight key elements resulting in these differences. We also wish to point to potential solutions for standardizing the upper limit of normal.

Recent findings: There are considerable differences in the values for what constitutes a 'normal' ALT serum concentration set by laboratories, and reference values may vary two-fold between different institutions (from 30 to 60 U/l). Key reasons for this include using markedly different reference populations to establish the bounds of normal, and differences in analyzers and assays used to quantify ALT levels. A number of studies have attempted to re-evaluate the upper limit of normal and propose new cut-offs that would allow better detection of liver disease.

Summary: The upper limit of normal for ALT continues to vary from one laboratory to another. Despite ongoing efforts, there is still an unmet demand to standardize ALT reference ranges, which is critical for clinical practice. More rigorous inclusion criteria for reference population studies and harmonization in analyzer differences is required to standardize ALT reference ranges universally.

临床实践中的转氨酶水平-什么是正常的?
综述目的:对于谷丙转氨酶(ALT)正常值的上限应该是多少,目前还没有普遍的共识。本综述的目的是为ALT正常值上限的广泛差异提供见解,并强调导致这些差异的关键因素。我们还希望指出规范正常上限的可能解决方案。最近的发现:实验室设定的“正常”ALT血清浓度值存在相当大的差异,不同机构之间的参考值可能相差两倍(从30到60 U/l)。主要原因包括使用明显不同的参考人群来建立正常界限,以及用于量化ALT水平的分析仪和分析方法的差异。一些研究试图重新评估正常的上限,并提出新的临界值,以便更好地检测肝脏疾病。总结:ALT的正常上限在不同的实验室继续变化。尽管正在努力,但标准化ALT参考范围的需求仍未得到满足,这对临床实践至关重要。需要更严格的参考人群研究的纳入标准和分析仪差异的协调,以普遍标准化ALT参考范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信