Impact of different pressures on the drying time of flexible endoscopes

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
W.Q. Hu, J.Y. Li, C.Y. Zhou, Y.X. Ge, Q. Gu
{"title":"Impact of different pressures on the drying time of flexible endoscopes","authors":"W.Q. Hu,&nbsp;J.Y. Li,&nbsp;C.Y. Zhou,&nbsp;Y.X. Ge,&nbsp;Q. Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The complex structure of endoscopes causes non-uniform drying conditions. However, current clinical drying practices lack precise guidance, leading to the insufficient drying of some endoscopes, which increases the risk of infection. The pressure of compressed air has been shown to influence the effectiveness of endoscope drying; however, specific requirements are absent.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the time required for the sufficient drying of different endoscopes under various pressure conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six different types of commonly used Olympus flexible endoscopes were selected, and for each type, multiple drying time groups were set under pressures of 0.102 and 0.204 MPa, with 10 endoscopes observed in each group.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Drying times varied according to the type and pressure. At 0.102 MPa, the instrument channel drying ranged from 80 s to 160 s (average: 123 s), while suction channel ranged from 260 s to 540 s (average: 428 s). At 0.204 MPa, the instrument channel dried in 50 s–90 s (average: 72 s), and suction channel in 130 s–230 s (average: 186 s).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Optimal drying times for endoscopes differ according to the type and pressure. A higher pressure (0.204 MPa) efficiently removes moisture and speeds up drying. Longer endoscopes with the same biopsy channel diameter require longer drying time. In addition, the instrument channel dries faster than the suction channel.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"161 ","pages":"Pages 37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125000970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The complex structure of endoscopes causes non-uniform drying conditions. However, current clinical drying practices lack precise guidance, leading to the insufficient drying of some endoscopes, which increases the risk of infection. The pressure of compressed air has been shown to influence the effectiveness of endoscope drying; however, specific requirements are absent.

Aim

To determine the time required for the sufficient drying of different endoscopes under various pressure conditions.

Methods

Six different types of commonly used Olympus flexible endoscopes were selected, and for each type, multiple drying time groups were set under pressures of 0.102 and 0.204 MPa, with 10 endoscopes observed in each group.

Findings

Drying times varied according to the type and pressure. At 0.102 MPa, the instrument channel drying ranged from 80 s to 160 s (average: 123 s), while suction channel ranged from 260 s to 540 s (average: 428 s). At 0.204 MPa, the instrument channel dried in 50 s–90 s (average: 72 s), and suction channel in 130 s–230 s (average: 186 s).

Conclusion

Optimal drying times for endoscopes differ according to the type and pressure. A higher pressure (0.204 MPa) efficiently removes moisture and speeds up drying. Longer endoscopes with the same biopsy channel diameter require longer drying time. In addition, the instrument channel dries faster than the suction channel.
不同压力对柔性内窥镜干燥时间的影响。
背景:内窥镜的复杂结构导致干燥条件不均匀。然而,目前临床干燥实践缺乏精确的指导,导致一些内窥镜干燥不足,增加了感染的风险。压缩空气的压力已被证明会影响内窥镜干燥的有效性;但是,没有具体的要求。本研究探讨了不同压力条件下不同内窥镜充分干燥所需的时间。方法:选择6种常用奥林巴斯柔性内窥镜,每种内窥镜分别在0.102、0.204 MPa压力下设置多个干燥时间组,每组观察10只内窥镜。结果:干燥时间因种类和压力的不同而不同。在0.102 MPa下,仪器通道干燥时间为80 ~ 160 s(平均123 s),吸入通道干燥时间为260 ~ 540 s(平均428 s)。在0.204 MPa下,仪器通道干燥时间为50秒至90秒(平均72秒),吸入通道干燥时间为130秒至230秒(平均186秒)。结论:内窥镜的最佳干燥时间因类型和压力不同而不同。更高的压力(0.204 MPa)有效地去除水分,加速干燥。相同活检通道直径的更长的内窥镜需要更长的干燥时间。此外,仪器通道比吸入通道干燥得快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信