Primary Health Care Physicians' Aging Simulation and Its Impact on Their Empathy: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Elena Arribas Gonzalo, Pablo García Mata, Lucía García Castaño, Sergio Bango Sánchez, Jonathan Díaz Rodríguez, Covadonga Merino López, José Antonio Cernuda Martínez
{"title":"Primary Health Care Physicians' Aging Simulation and Its Impact on Their Empathy: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Elena Arribas Gonzalo, Pablo García Mata, Lucía García Castaño, Sergio Bango Sánchez, Jonathan Díaz Rodríguez, Covadonga Merino López, José Antonio Cernuda Martínez","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Empathy is of particular importance in the relationship with elderly patients. Practical exercises, and especially those that include simulation situations, are an effective tool for the development and improvement of physicians' skills. The objective was to assess the evaluation of the degree of empathy toward the elderly people by primary care physicians, using an aging simulator suit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental, randomized, controlled, multicenter study was conducted. The relationship between the difference in preintervention and postintervention Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy scores and sociodemographic characteristics of physicians were assessed. A univariate analysis using logistic regression was conducted to ascertain the impact of sociodemographic and occupational variables on the discrepancy in preintervention and postintervention scores on the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean preintervention score in the intervention group was 117.92 points (SD = 14.34), while the mean postintervention score was 121.32 points (SD = 10.79). The mean difference was statistically significant (t = -2.176, P = .034). In the control group, the mean preintervention score was 119.47 points (SD = 9.82), while the mean postintervention score was 120.40 points (SD = 9.89). This mean difference was not statistically significant (t = -0.566, P= .576). A statistically significant increase between pre- and postintervention scores was observed in physicians aged 65 years and older (Odds Ratio = 9.30; P = .046), and in physicians working in the semiurban setting (Odds Ratio = 2.10; P = .041).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aging simulation produced a statistically significant improvement in the empathy levels of primary health care physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Empathy is of particular importance in the relationship with elderly patients. Practical exercises, and especially those that include simulation situations, are an effective tool for the development and improvement of physicians' skills. The objective was to assess the evaluation of the degree of empathy toward the elderly people by primary care physicians, using an aging simulator suit.

Methods: A quasi-experimental, randomized, controlled, multicenter study was conducted. The relationship between the difference in preintervention and postintervention Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy scores and sociodemographic characteristics of physicians were assessed. A univariate analysis using logistic regression was conducted to ascertain the impact of sociodemographic and occupational variables on the discrepancy in preintervention and postintervention scores on the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy.

Results: The mean preintervention score in the intervention group was 117.92 points (SD = 14.34), while the mean postintervention score was 121.32 points (SD = 10.79). The mean difference was statistically significant (t = -2.176, P = .034). In the control group, the mean preintervention score was 119.47 points (SD = 9.82), while the mean postintervention score was 120.40 points (SD = 9.89). This mean difference was not statistically significant (t = -0.566, P= .576). A statistically significant increase between pre- and postintervention scores was observed in physicians aged 65 years and older (Odds Ratio = 9.30; P = .046), and in physicians working in the semiurban setting (Odds Ratio = 2.10; P = .041).

Conclusions: The aging simulation produced a statistically significant improvement in the empathy levels of primary health care physicians.

初级卫生保健医师模拟衰老及其对共情的影响:一项准实验研究
引言:在与老年患者的关系中,移情尤为重要。实践练习,特别是那些包含模拟情景的练习,是发展和提高医生技能的有效工具。目的是评估初级保健医生对老年人的共情程度的评估,使用衰老模拟器套装。方法:采用准实验、随机、对照、多中心研究。评估干预前和干预后杰弗逊医师共情量表得分差异与医师社会人口学特征的关系。采用logistic回归进行单变量分析,以确定社会人口学和职业变量对干预前和干预后医生共情杰弗逊量表得分差异的影响。结果:干预组干预前平均得分为117.92分(SD = 14.34),干预后平均得分为121.32分(SD = 10.79)。平均差异有统计学意义(t = -2.176, P = 0.034)。对照组干预前平均得分为119.47分(SD = 9.82),干预后平均得分为120.40分(SD = 9.89)。平均差异无统计学意义(t = -0.566, P= .576)。在65岁及以上的医生中,干预前和干预后得分有统计学意义上的显著增加(优势比= 9.30;P = 0.046),以及在半城市环境中工作的医生(优势比= 2.10;P = .041)。结论:衰老模拟在初级卫生保健医生的共情水平上产生了统计学上显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信