The effect of common blood sampling types on metabolic screening.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ceylan Bal, Esra Özyurt, Gülsen Yılmaz
{"title":"The effect of common blood sampling types on metabolic screening.","authors":"Ceylan Bal, Esra Özyurt, Gülsen Yılmaz","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2490936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Capillary blood is often used for dried blood spot samples in metabolic screening tests. This study's objective is to examine the amino acid and acylcarnitine levels in the commonly used sampling types from the same subjects and compare the findings with capillary whole blood samples as the reference. Thirty adult patipicants' blood samples were collected into four different tubes: citrated tubes, serum separating tubes, heparin tubes, and EDTA tubes, respectively and additionally into the syringe. 50 μL blood from each tube and syringe was absorbed onto filter papers. Additionally, capillary whole blood taken from each person's fingertip was absorbed onto the filter paper. All measurements were performed with flow-injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry. In the pairwise comparison of fingertip group and other groups, almost all results were different from the reference group (<i>p</i> < 0.05), except for glutamine and methionine for amino acid analysis. The difference in acylcarnitine levels is not as obvious as in amino acid levels. If other sampling types are used for metabolic screening instead of capillary whole blood, it may lead to low results, especially in amino acid measurements. Additionally, cut-off values should be interpreted, taking into consideration the sampling type, and laboratories should be informed about the sampling type used.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":"85 3","pages":"196-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2490936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capillary blood is often used for dried blood spot samples in metabolic screening tests. This study's objective is to examine the amino acid and acylcarnitine levels in the commonly used sampling types from the same subjects and compare the findings with capillary whole blood samples as the reference. Thirty adult patipicants' blood samples were collected into four different tubes: citrated tubes, serum separating tubes, heparin tubes, and EDTA tubes, respectively and additionally into the syringe. 50 μL blood from each tube and syringe was absorbed onto filter papers. Additionally, capillary whole blood taken from each person's fingertip was absorbed onto the filter paper. All measurements were performed with flow-injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry. In the pairwise comparison of fingertip group and other groups, almost all results were different from the reference group (p < 0.05), except for glutamine and methionine for amino acid analysis. The difference in acylcarnitine levels is not as obvious as in amino acid levels. If other sampling types are used for metabolic screening instead of capillary whole blood, it may lead to low results, especially in amino acid measurements. Additionally, cut-off values should be interpreted, taking into consideration the sampling type, and laboratories should be informed about the sampling type used.

常见血样类型对代谢筛查的影响。
在代谢筛选试验中,毛细管血常用于干血斑样本。本研究的目的是检测同一受试者常用采样类型中的氨基酸和酰基肉碱水平,并将结果与作为参考的毛细血管全血样本进行比较。将30例成人患者的血样分别采集到柠檬酸管、血清分离管、肝素管、EDTA管四种不同的管中,并分别放入注射器中。取各管、注射器各50 μL的血吸到滤纸上。此外,从每个人的指尖提取的毛细血管全血被吸收到滤纸上。所有测量均采用流动注射分析串联质谱法进行。在指尖组与其他组的两两比较中,几乎所有结果都与参照组不同(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信