Implicit doping attitude and athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping when being offered beverages with banned performance-enhancing substances.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Derwin King Chung Chan, Lawrence Man Ho Yip, Tracy Chor Wai Tang, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung, Daniel F Gucciardi, Martin S Hagger
{"title":"Implicit doping attitude and athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping when being offered beverages with banned performance-enhancing substances.","authors":"Derwin King Chung Chan, Lawrence Man Ho Yip, Tracy Chor Wai Tang, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung, Daniel F Gucciardi, Martin S Hagger","doi":"10.1016/j.jsams.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Implicit doping attitude reflects the strength of one's automatic or unconscious evaluation of doping. This cross-societal study examined how implicit doping attitude predicted athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A real-time experimental design with cross-sectional data from three geographical regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 681 athletes (M<sub>age</sub> = 28.21, SD = 8.43; female = 47.1 %) from Hong Kong (N = 177), Australia (N = 164) and the United Kingdom (N = 340) completed two real-time experimental tasks for measuring their implicit doping attitude (a brief single-category implicit association test) and the accuracy of avoiding unintentional doping (a novel canned beverage sorting task).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implicit doping attitude was significantly and negatively (β = -0.09, p < .05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.03, 95 % CI of β = -1.64 to -0.15) associated with athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping by screening out beverages with banned performance-enhancing substances. This association was maintained when we statistically controlled for the effects of society.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Athletes with a positive implicit doping attitude were less accurate in determining whether unknown beverages with the possible presence of banned performance-enhancing substances should be consumed. The negative association between implicit doping and athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping appeared to be consistent across societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2025.04.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Implicit doping attitude reflects the strength of one's automatic or unconscious evaluation of doping. This cross-societal study examined how implicit doping attitude predicted athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping.

Design: A real-time experimental design with cross-sectional data from three geographical regions.

Methods: A total of 681 athletes (Mage = 28.21, SD = 8.43; female = 47.1 %) from Hong Kong (N = 177), Australia (N = 164) and the United Kingdom (N = 340) completed two real-time experimental tasks for measuring their implicit doping attitude (a brief single-category implicit association test) and the accuracy of avoiding unintentional doping (a novel canned beverage sorting task).

Results: Implicit doping attitude was significantly and negatively (β = -0.09, p < .05, R2 = 0.03, 95 % CI of β = -1.64 to -0.15) associated with athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping by screening out beverages with banned performance-enhancing substances. This association was maintained when we statistically controlled for the effects of society.

Conclusions: Athletes with a positive implicit doping attitude were less accurate in determining whether unknown beverages with the possible presence of banned performance-enhancing substances should be consumed. The negative association between implicit doping and athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping appeared to be consistent across societies.

含蓄的兴奋剂态度和运动员在被提供含有违禁兴奋剂的饮料时避免无意服用兴奋剂的准确性。
目的:内隐兴奋剂态度反映了一个人对兴奋剂的自动或无意识评价的强度。这项跨社会研究考察了内隐兴奋剂态度如何预测运动员避免非故意兴奋剂的准确性。设计:实时实验设计,采用三个地理区域的横断面数据。方法:共681名运动员(Mage = 28.21,SD = 8.43;女性 = 47.1 %)从香港(N = 177),澳大利亚(N = 164)和英国(N = 340)完成了两种实时实验任务来测量他们的隐式兴奋剂的态度(简要募捐隐联想测验)和避免无意掺杂的准确性(小说罐装饮料排序的任务)。结果:隐性兴奋剂态度与运动员甄别含违禁兴奋剂饮料避免非故意兴奋剂的准确性呈显著负相关(β = -0.09,p 2 = - 0.03,β = -1.64 ~ -0.15的95 % CI)。当我们在统计上控制了社会的影响时,这种联系仍然存在。结论:持积极隐性兴奋剂态度的运动员在判断是否应该饮用可能含有违禁兴奋剂的未知饮料时准确性较低。隐性兴奋剂与运动员避免非故意兴奋剂的准确性之间的负相关似乎在各个社会中都是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport is the official journal of Sports Medicine Australia (SMA) and is an an international refereed research publication covering all aspects of sport science and medicine. The Journal considers for publication Original research and Review papers in the sub-disciplines relating generally to the broad sports medicine and sports science fields: sports medicine, sports injury (including injury epidemiology and injury prevention), physiotherapy, podiatry, physical activity and health, sports science, biomechanics, exercise physiology, motor control and learning, sport and exercise psychology, sports nutrition, public health (as relevant to sport and exercise), and rehabilitation and injury management. Manuscripts with an interdisciplinary perspective with specific applications to sport and exercise and its interaction with health will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信