Quality cancer survivorship care: a modified Delphi study to define nurse capabilities.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Gemma McErlean, Heidi Hui, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Nicolas H Hart, Meinir Krishnasamy, Bogda Koczwara, Thomas Walwyn, Mahesh Iddawela, Rebecca McIntosh, Raymond J Chan, Michael Jefford
{"title":"Quality cancer survivorship care: a modified Delphi study to define nurse capabilities.","authors":"Gemma McErlean, Heidi Hui, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Nicolas H Hart, Meinir Krishnasamy, Bogda Koczwara, Thomas Walwyn, Mahesh Iddawela, Rebecca McIntosh, Raymond J Chan, Michael Jefford","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01804-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish capabilities required by nurses to deliver quality cancer survivorship care in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round online modified Delphi involving Australian cancer nurses. Initial domains and capability statements were based on the Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework and supplemented by national and international nursing frameworks. In Round 1 (R1), experts categorised the applicability of 53 capabilities for cancer nurses, across eight domains, in relation to Australian National Professional Development Framework for Cancer Nursing (EdCaN) groups: 'All', 'Many', 'Some', and 'Few' nurses, or not relevant. In Round 2 (R2), experts rated agreement with capabilities allocated to the nurse groups. A priori consensus was set at ≥ 80%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were distributed to 51 experts, with a response rate of 92% (47/51) for R1 and 75% (38/51) for R2. Following R1, ten capabilities were added, resulting in 63 capabilities for R2 to establish consensus allocation to EdCaN groupings. Fifty-seven capabilities reached consensus; four capabilities were moved from 'many' to 'some' nurses; one capability was moved from 'some' to 'few' nurses; and one capability was retained in 'all' nurses following Delphi feedback and research team discussion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sixty-three capabilities across eight cancer survivorship care domains were identified and allocated to different nursing groupings. This study provides important foundational work by identifying the capabilities of cancer nurses to deliver quality cancer survivorship care in Australia.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>The identification of clearly defined capabilities may improve the quality of cancer survivorship care through the enrichment and standardisation of educational curricula and continuing professional education, and through improved workforce planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01804-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To establish capabilities required by nurses to deliver quality cancer survivorship care in Australia.

Methods: A two-round online modified Delphi involving Australian cancer nurses. Initial domains and capability statements were based on the Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework and supplemented by national and international nursing frameworks. In Round 1 (R1), experts categorised the applicability of 53 capabilities for cancer nurses, across eight domains, in relation to Australian National Professional Development Framework for Cancer Nursing (EdCaN) groups: 'All', 'Many', 'Some', and 'Few' nurses, or not relevant. In Round 2 (R2), experts rated agreement with capabilities allocated to the nurse groups. A priori consensus was set at ≥ 80%.

Results: Surveys were distributed to 51 experts, with a response rate of 92% (47/51) for R1 and 75% (38/51) for R2. Following R1, ten capabilities were added, resulting in 63 capabilities for R2 to establish consensus allocation to EdCaN groupings. Fifty-seven capabilities reached consensus; four capabilities were moved from 'many' to 'some' nurses; one capability was moved from 'some' to 'few' nurses; and one capability was retained in 'all' nurses following Delphi feedback and research team discussion.

Conclusions: Sixty-three capabilities across eight cancer survivorship care domains were identified and allocated to different nursing groupings. This study provides important foundational work by identifying the capabilities of cancer nurses to deliver quality cancer survivorship care in Australia.

Implications for cancer survivors: The identification of clearly defined capabilities may improve the quality of cancer survivorship care through the enrichment and standardisation of educational curricula and continuing professional education, and through improved workforce planning.

高质量的癌症生存护理:一项修正的德尔菲研究来定义护士的能力。
目的:建立澳大利亚护士提供高质量癌症生存护理所需的能力。方法:对澳大利亚癌症护理人员进行两轮在线修正问卷调查。最初的领域和能力陈述是基于癌症生存护理框架的质量,并辅以国家和国际护理框架。在第一轮(R1)中,专家将53种能力对癌症护士的适用性进行了分类,涉及澳大利亚国家癌症护理专业发展框架(EdCaN)组的八个领域:“所有”,“许多”,“一些”和“少数”护士,或不相关。在第二轮(R2)中,专家们对护士组的能力进行了评估。先验共识设定为≥80%。结果:共向51位专家发放问卷,R1的回复率为92% (47/51),R2的回复率为75%(38/51)。在R1之后,增加了10个功能,导致R2有63个功能,以建立对EdCaN分组的共识分配。达成共识的能力有57项;四项能力从“许多”护士转移到“一些”护士;一项能力从“一些”护士转移到“少数”护士;根据德尔菲反馈和研究团队讨论,“所有”护士都保留了一种能力。结论:确定了八个癌症生存护理领域的63种能力,并将其分配到不同的护理组。本研究通过确定癌症护士在澳大利亚提供高质量癌症生存护理的能力,提供了重要的基础工作。对癌症幸存者的影响:通过丰富和标准化的教育课程和继续专业教育,以及通过改进的劳动力规划,明确定义的能力可以提高癌症幸存者护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信