On Alan Armstrong's 'Towards a Strong Virtue Ethics for Nursing Practice'.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Roger Newham
{"title":"On Alan Armstrong's 'Towards a Strong Virtue Ethics for Nursing Practice'.","authors":"Roger Newham","doi":"10.1111/nup.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Armstrong's (2006) 'Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice' is focused on how the practice of nursing necessitates morally good character traits as virtues including the intellectual virtue phronesis. Because of this, he claims, nursing ethics should also be grounded in virtue ethics. Illness creates a unique phenomenon that involves a special therapeutic as helping relationship necessitating good interpersonal skills and patient-centred care that, for the role of a nurse and nursing ethics, requires a focus on persons and relationships, character and emotions. Obligation, act centred normative theories are, according to Armstrong, incomplete and inadequate for nursing practice. They are incomplete and inadequate as moral theories because they ignore, or at least do not give appropriate moral importance to, other factors of life such as character, moral education, emotions and relationships. Armstrong grounds his virtue ethics in a 'moralised' eudaimonia. This leads to problems of getting from good for to good. It is suggested a non eudaimonistic, virtue ethics by Swanton might be just what Armstrong is after but as an account of ethics not morality.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":"26 2","pages":"e70027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Armstrong's (2006) 'Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice' is focused on how the practice of nursing necessitates morally good character traits as virtues including the intellectual virtue phronesis. Because of this, he claims, nursing ethics should also be grounded in virtue ethics. Illness creates a unique phenomenon that involves a special therapeutic as helping relationship necessitating good interpersonal skills and patient-centred care that, for the role of a nurse and nursing ethics, requires a focus on persons and relationships, character and emotions. Obligation, act centred normative theories are, according to Armstrong, incomplete and inadequate for nursing practice. They are incomplete and inadequate as moral theories because they ignore, or at least do not give appropriate moral importance to, other factors of life such as character, moral education, emotions and relationships. Armstrong grounds his virtue ethics in a 'moralised' eudaimonia. This leads to problems of getting from good for to good. It is suggested a non eudaimonistic, virtue ethics by Swanton might be just what Armstrong is after but as an account of ethics not morality.

论艾伦·阿姆斯特朗的“护理实践的强大美德伦理”。
阿姆斯特朗的(2006)“护理实践的强大道德伦理”侧重于护理实践如何需要道德上良好的性格特征作为美德,包括知识美德。正因为如此,他声称,护理伦理也应该建立在美德伦理的基础上。疾病创造了一种独特的现象,涉及一种特殊的治疗作为帮助关系,需要良好的人际交往技巧和以病人为中心的护理,对于护士的角色和护理伦理来说,需要关注人和关系、性格和情感。义务,行为为中心的规范理论是,根据阿姆斯特朗,不完整和不充分的护理实践。它们作为道德理论是不完整和不充分的,因为它们忽略了生活中的其他因素,如性格、道德教育、情感和关系,或者至少没有给予适当的道德重要性。阿姆斯特朗将他的美德伦理学建立在一种“道德化”的幸福主义之上。这就导致了从善到善的问题。斯旺顿提出了一种非唯美主义的美德伦理学,这可能正是阿姆斯特朗所追求的,但这是一种对伦理的解释,而不是道德。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Philosophy provides a forum for discussion of philosophical issues in nursing. These focus on questions relating to the nature of nursing and to the phenomena of key relevance to it. For example, any understanding of what nursing is presupposes some conception of just what nurses are trying to do when they nurse. But what are the ends of nursing? Are they to promote health, prevent disease, promote well-being, enhance autonomy, relieve suffering, or some combination of these? How are these ends are to be met? What kind of knowledge is needed in order to nurse? Practical, theoretical, aesthetic, moral, political, ''intuitive'' or some other? Papers that explore other aspects of philosophical enquiry and analysis of relevance to nursing (and any other healthcare or social care activity) are also welcome and might include, but not be limited to, critical discussions of the work of nurse theorists who have advanced philosophical claims (e.g., Benner, Benner and Wrubel, Carper, Schrok, Watson, Parse and so on) as well as critical engagement with philosophers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Kuhn, Polanyi, Taylor, MacIntyre and so on) whose work informs health care in general and nursing in particular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信