Safety and outcomes of endovascular treatment with stent implantation in patients with malignant superior vena cava syndrome: single-center experience.

IF 4.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marta Banaszkiewicz, Paweł Kurzyna, Szymon Darocha, Michał Florczyk, Piotr Kędzierski, Michał Piłka, Rafał Mańczak, Piotr Szwed, Maria Wieteska-Miłek, Sebastian Szmit, Zbigniew Krasiński, Marcin Kurzyna
{"title":"Safety and outcomes of endovascular treatment with stent implantation in patients with malignant superior vena cava syndrome: single-center experience.","authors":"Marta Banaszkiewicz, Paweł Kurzyna, Szymon Darocha, Michał Florczyk, Piotr Kędzierski, Michał Piłka, Rafał Mańczak, Piotr Szwed, Maria Wieteska-Miłek, Sebastian Szmit, Zbigniew Krasiński, Marcin Kurzyna","doi":"10.20452/pamw.17003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) comprises a range of symptoms and signs of mechanical obstruction of the SVC lumen.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) with stent implantation in patients with SVCS due to malignancy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients with malignant SVCS who received EVT with stent implantation between July 2014 and November 2024. The efficacy of the procedure was evaluated based on technical success, clinical symptom relief, periprocedural complication rate, and recurrence rate, with follow‑up conducted 1 month postprocedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56 stents were implanted in 40 patients (57.5% women) in 47 procedures. Thirty‑three patients (81.5%) underwent conventional anticancer treatment prior to the procedure (previously treated patients [PTPs]) and 7 (17.5%) were naive to prior anticancer treatment (not previously treated patients [NPTPs]). The EVT with stent implantation was technically successful in 39 patients (97.5%). At least moderate reduction in symptoms was observed in 81.8% of the individuals in the PTP group and in 85.7% in the NPTP group (P = 0.67). In 28 patients (70%), only 1 stent was required. The overall complication rate was 12.5%. The primary stent patency rate was 92.3% (90.6% vs 100%; P = 0.41 for the PTP vs NPTP group, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EVT with stent placement is effective in symptomatic patients with SVCS due to malignancy. The procedure is associated with acceptable complication and reocclusion rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49680,"journal":{"name":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.17003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) comprises a range of symptoms and signs of mechanical obstruction of the SVC lumen.

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) with stent implantation in patients with SVCS due to malignancy.

Materials and methods: This retrospective observational study included patients with malignant SVCS who received EVT with stent implantation between July 2014 and November 2024. The efficacy of the procedure was evaluated based on technical success, clinical symptom relief, periprocedural complication rate, and recurrence rate, with follow‑up conducted 1 month postprocedure.

Results: A total of 56 stents were implanted in 40 patients (57.5% women) in 47 procedures. Thirty‑three patients (81.5%) underwent conventional anticancer treatment prior to the procedure (previously treated patients [PTPs]) and 7 (17.5%) were naive to prior anticancer treatment (not previously treated patients [NPTPs]). The EVT with stent implantation was technically successful in 39 patients (97.5%). At least moderate reduction in symptoms was observed in 81.8% of the individuals in the PTP group and in 85.7% in the NPTP group (P = 0.67). In 28 patients (70%), only 1 stent was required. The overall complication rate was 12.5%. The primary stent patency rate was 92.3% (90.6% vs 100%; P = 0.41 for the PTP vs NPTP group, respectively).

Conclusions: The EVT with stent placement is effective in symptomatic patients with SVCS due to malignancy. The procedure is associated with acceptable complication and reocclusion rates.

恶性上腔静脉综合征患者血管内支架置入术的安全性和疗效:单中心经验。
上腔静脉综合征(SVCS)包括一系列SVCS管腔机械阻塞的症状和体征。目的:探讨血管内支架治疗(EVT)治疗恶性SVCS的有效性和安全性。材料与方法:对2014年7月至2024年11月行EVT联合支架植入术的恶性SVCS患者进行回顾性观察研究。根据技术成功率、临床症状缓解程度、围手术期并发症发生率和复发率评估手术效果,术后随访1个月。结果:40例患者47次手术共植入56个支架,其中女性占57.5%。33例(81.5%)患者在手术前接受了常规抗癌治疗(PTP,既往接受过治疗的患者),7例(17.5%)患者原本接受过抗癌治疗(NPTP,未接受过治疗的患者)。39例(97.5%)患者在技术上取得了EVT支架植入的成功。81.8%的PTP组和85.7%的NPTP组患者至少有中度症状减轻(p=0.67)。28例(70.0%)患者只需要一个支架。总并发症发生率为12.5%。一期支架通畅率为92.3% (PTP组90.6% vs. 100%, P = 0.41)。结论:EVT联合支架置入术治疗有症状的恶性SVCS是有效的。该手术与可接受的并发症和再闭塞率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Archives of Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed periodical issued monthly in English as an official journal of the Polish Society of Internal Medicine. The journal is designed to publish articles related to all aspects of internal medicine, both clinical and basic science, provided they have practical implications. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine appears monthly in both print and online versions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信