Clinical Study on the Application of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Combined with Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in Inguinal Surgery in the Elderly.

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Ultrasound Pub Date : 2024-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jmu.jmu_146_23
Jian Zhang, Guohai Sun, Lei Zhang, Lihui Zhang
{"title":"Clinical Study on the Application of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Combined with Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in Inguinal Surgery in the Elderly.","authors":"Jian Zhang, Guohai Sun, Lei Zhang, Lihui Zhang","doi":"10.4103/jmu.jmu_146_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of combining an ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block with an ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block during inguinal surgery in older patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2020 and June 2023, 300 elderly patients who underwent inguinal surgery at our institution were randomly divided into an observation group (<i>n</i> = 150) and a control group (<i>n</i> = 150). The observation group received ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in addition to ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, whereas the control group received only ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block. The postoperative conditions and anesthesia dose (propofol and remifentanil) during surgery were recorded. The average arterial pressure and heart rate of the two groups were compared 10 min before anesthesia, 10 min after anesthesia, and postoperatively. Pain intensity was measured during and 30 min after the procedure using the pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), aldosterone (ALD), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were evaluated before surgery and 1 day later, and the incidence of postoperative complications was noted and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The propofol and remifentanil dosages in the observation group were much lower than those in the control group, and hospital stay and recovery times were significantly shorter (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Ten minutes before anesthesia, there was no significant difference in the mean arterial pressure and heart rate between the two groups, and no difference at any other time point in the observation group (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Ten minutes after anesthesia and postoperatively, the average arterial pressure and heart rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, whereas those of the control group were higher than those observed preanesthesia (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The postoperative MDA and ALD levels in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05), and the postoperative TAC level in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The VAS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group. No discernible difference in the frequency of complications was observed between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block with ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block can significantly minimize the amount of anesthesia used during surgery, exert a good analgesic effect, shorten hospitalization time, stabilize hemodynamics, and reduce stress response with high safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":45466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ultrasound","volume":"33 1","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmu.jmu_146_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of combining an ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block with an ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block during inguinal surgery in older patients.

Methods: Between December 2020 and June 2023, 300 elderly patients who underwent inguinal surgery at our institution were randomly divided into an observation group (n = 150) and a control group (n = 150). The observation group received ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in addition to ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, whereas the control group received only ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block. The postoperative conditions and anesthesia dose (propofol and remifentanil) during surgery were recorded. The average arterial pressure and heart rate of the two groups were compared 10 min before anesthesia, 10 min after anesthesia, and postoperatively. Pain intensity was measured during and 30 min after the procedure using the pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), aldosterone (ALD), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were evaluated before surgery and 1 day later, and the incidence of postoperative complications was noted and compared between the two groups.

Results: The propofol and remifentanil dosages in the observation group were much lower than those in the control group, and hospital stay and recovery times were significantly shorter (P < 0.05). Ten minutes before anesthesia, there was no significant difference in the mean arterial pressure and heart rate between the two groups, and no difference at any other time point in the observation group (P > 0.05). Ten minutes after anesthesia and postoperatively, the average arterial pressure and heart rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, whereas those of the control group were higher than those observed preanesthesia (P < 0.05). The postoperative MDA and ALD levels in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05), and the postoperative TAC level in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group. No discernible difference in the frequency of complications was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block with ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block can significantly minimize the amount of anesthesia used during surgery, exert a good analgesic effect, shorten hospitalization time, stabilize hemodynamics, and reduce stress response with high safety.

超声引导腰方肌阻滞联合髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟手术中的应用
背景:本研究旨在探讨超声引导下腰方肌阻滞联合髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞在老年患者腹股沟手术中的效果。方法:选取2020年12月至2023年6月在我院行腹股沟手术的老年患者300例,随机分为观察组(n = 150)和对照组(n = 150)。观察组在超声引导下腰方肌阻滞治疗的基础上行髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞治疗,对照组仅行超声引导下髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞治疗。记录术后情况及术中麻醉剂量(异丙酚和瑞芬太尼)。比较两组患者麻醉前10 min、麻醉后10 min及术后平均动脉压和心率。采用疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量手术期间和手术后30分钟的疼痛强度。测定两组患者术前及术后1 d丙二醛(MDA)、醛固酮(ALD)、总抗氧化能力(TAC)水平,并比较两组患者术后并发症的发生率。结果:观察组患者异丙酚和瑞芬太尼用量均显著低于对照组,住院时间和康复时间均显著缩短(P < 0.05)。麻醉前10 min,两组平均动脉压、心率比较差异无统计学意义,观察组其他时间点比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。麻醉后及术后10 min,观察组平均动脉压、心率均低于对照组,对照组平均动脉压、心率均高于麻醉前,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组患者术后MDA、ALD水平显著高于对照组(P < 0.05), TAC水平显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组患者VAS评分显著低于对照组。两组患者并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:超声引导下腰方肌阻滞联合髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞可显著减少术中麻醉用量,镇痛效果好,缩短住院时间,稳定血流动力学,减少应激反应,安全性高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ultrasound
Journal of Medical Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
90
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Ultrasound is the peer-reviewed publication of the Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, and the Chinese Taipei Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. Its aim is to promote clinical and scientific research in ultrasonography, and to serve as a channel of communication among sonologists, sonographers, and medical ultrasound physicians in the Asia-Pacific region and wider international community. The Journal invites original contributions relating to the clinical and laboratory investigations and applications of ultrasonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信