Cutoff Points for Commonly Used Instruments to Assess Mental Health Problems Among Adults With Tourette's Syndrome.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rachael Nicholls, Tamara Pringsheim, Davide Martino, Chenhui Hao, Julian Fletcher, Natalia Szejko
{"title":"Cutoff Points for Commonly Used Instruments to Assess Mental Health Problems Among Adults With Tourette's Syndrome.","authors":"Rachael Nicholls, Tamara Pringsheim, Davide Martino, Chenhui Hao, Julian Fletcher, Natalia Szejko","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, and anxiety are highly comorbid in Tourette's syndrome. Cutoff points of screening instruments for these conditions have been validated in the general population. The authors assessed whether established cutoff points on the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale; Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); PHQ-2; Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, version 1.1 (ASRS v1.1); and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI) need to be adjusted for adults with Tourette's syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six adults with Tourette's syndrome completed these instruments and a diagnostic psychiatric interview. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio) for each instrument at various cutoffs. Cutoffs for the sample of adults with Tourette's syndrome were suggested by the lowest value derived from a Euclidean distance method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample of adults with Tourette's syndrome, the optimal cutoff points were a GAD-7 score ≥13 (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 91%; and AUC, 79%), a PHQ-9 score ≥15 (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 73%; and AUC, 70%), a PHQ-2 score ≥3 (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 67%; and AUC, 67%), an ASRS v1.1 score ≥14 (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 77%; and AUC, 80%), and an OCI score ≥63 (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 89%; and AUC, 79%). The best-performing instrument was the ASRS v1.1, followed by the GAD-7 and OCI; the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 performed least well in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further research is needed to adapt screening instruments for the assessment of comorbid conditions among patients with Tourette's syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"appineuropsych20240226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, and anxiety are highly comorbid in Tourette's syndrome. Cutoff points of screening instruments for these conditions have been validated in the general population. The authors assessed whether established cutoff points on the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale; Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); PHQ-2; Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, version 1.1 (ASRS v1.1); and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI) need to be adjusted for adults with Tourette's syndrome.

Methods: Thirty-six adults with Tourette's syndrome completed these instruments and a diagnostic psychiatric interview. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio) for each instrument at various cutoffs. Cutoffs for the sample of adults with Tourette's syndrome were suggested by the lowest value derived from a Euclidean distance method.

Results: In this sample of adults with Tourette's syndrome, the optimal cutoff points were a GAD-7 score ≥13 (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 91%; and AUC, 79%), a PHQ-9 score ≥15 (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 73%; and AUC, 70%), a PHQ-2 score ≥3 (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 67%; and AUC, 67%), an ASRS v1.1 score ≥14 (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 77%; and AUC, 80%), and an OCI score ≥63 (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 89%; and AUC, 79%). The best-performing instrument was the ASRS v1.1, followed by the GAD-7 and OCI; the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 performed least well in this population.

Conclusions: Further research is needed to adapt screening instruments for the assessment of comorbid conditions among patients with Tourette's syndrome.

用于评估成人妥瑞氏综合征患者心理健康问题的常用仪器的截止点
目的:注意缺陷多动障碍、强迫症、抑郁和焦虑是图雷特综合征的高度合并症。这些疾病的筛查工具的截止点已在一般人群中得到验证。作者评估了是否在广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)量表上建立了截止点;患者健康问卷-9;PHQ-2;成人ADHD自我报告量表1.1版(ASRS v1.1);和强迫症量表(OCI)需要对患有图雷特综合症的成年人进行调整。方法:36名患有图雷特综合征的成年人完成了这些仪器和诊断性精神病学访谈。计算每种仪器在不同截止点的诊断准确性指标(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC]、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、阳性似然比和阴性似然比)。通过欧几里得距离法得出的最低值来建议患有图雷特综合症的成人样本的截止值。结果:在该图雷特综合征成人样本中,最佳截止点为GAD-7评分≥13(敏感性67%;特异性,91%;和AUC, 79%), PHQ-9评分≥15(敏感性67%;特异性,73%;AUC为70%),PHQ-2评分≥3(敏感性67%;特异性,67%;AUC为67%),ASRS v1.1评分≥14(敏感性83%;特异性,77%;AUC为80%),OCI评分≥63(敏感性为70%;特异性,89%;AUC为79%)。表现最好的仪器是ASRS v1.1,其次是GAD-7和OCI;PHQ-9和PHQ-2在这一人群中表现最差。结论:需要进一步的研究来适应筛查工具来评估抽动秽语综合征患者的合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official Journal of the American Neuropsychiatric Association, the premier North American organization of clinicians, scientists, and educators specializing in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and the clinical neurosciences, the Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (JNCN) aims to publish works that advance the science of brain-behavior relationships, the care of persons and families affected by neurodevelopmental, acquired neurological, and neurodegenerative conditions, and education and training in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry. JNCN publishes peer-reviewed articles on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral manifestations of neurological conditions, the structural and functional neuroanatomy of idiopathic psychiatric disorders, and the clinical and educational applications and public health implications of scientific advances in these areas. The Journal features systematic reviews and meta-analyses, narrative reviews, original research articles, scholarly considerations of treatment and educational challenges in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry, analyses and commentaries on advances and emerging trends in the field, international perspectives on neuropsychiatry, opinions and introspections, case reports that inform on the structural and functional bases of neuropsychiatric conditions, and classic pieces from the field’s rich history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信