Drivers of engagement in virtual communities of practice: a qualitative study of Australian pharmacists' perceptions and experiences.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Abdella Birhan Yabeyu, Jo Cavanagh, Rachel Lawson, Kathy Le, Lili Schmah, Kenneth Lee, Deborah Hawthorne, Amy T Page
{"title":"Drivers of engagement in virtual communities of practice: a qualitative study of Australian pharmacists' perceptions and experiences.","authors":"Abdella Birhan Yabeyu, Jo Cavanagh, Rachel Lawson, Kathy Le, Lili Schmah, Kenneth Lee, Deborah Hawthorne, Amy T Page","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01913-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In today's digital age, virtual Communities of Practice allow pharmacists to connect and collaborate across geographical and professional boundaries. These platforms create opportunities for shared learning and knowledge exchange, fostering innovation and helping pharmacists stay informed about evolving practices.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore the factors that drive engagement in virtual Communities of Practice among Australian pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted with 24 Australian pharmacists recruited via social media, professional networks, and conferences. Five online focus groups (each with 3-4 participants) were conducted, lasting 45-60 min. Discussions were transcribed verbatim, and data were analysed thematically using the Framework Method. Rigor was ensured through convenience sampling, maintenance of an audit trail, and the use of independent coding and thematic analysis to enhance credibility and confirmability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged from the analysis: 'access to information', 'sense of community', 'active facilitation', and 'platform usability'. Participants appreciated peer-shared knowledge and staying informed about current practices. A strong sense of community was cultivated as participants supported by others within the virtual community of practice. Active facilitation, such as moderators filtering content and engaging participants, was essential for maintaining a constructive environment. Additionally, platform usability, characterised by user-friendly features, the ability to keep personal and professional boundaries, and flexibility in accessing activities, significantly enhanced participant engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified four key drivers of engagement in virtual Communities of Practice including accessible information, community support, active facilitation, and platform usability. These findings inform the design of virtual Communities of Practice to enhance professional collaboration and practice. Addressing these factors can enhance virtual Communities of Practice effectiveness in supporting professional collaboration, reducing isolation, and fostering continuous learning, particularly in evolving pharmacy roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01913-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In today's digital age, virtual Communities of Practice allow pharmacists to connect and collaborate across geographical and professional boundaries. These platforms create opportunities for shared learning and knowledge exchange, fostering innovation and helping pharmacists stay informed about evolving practices.

Aim: This study aimed to explore the factors that drive engagement in virtual Communities of Practice among Australian pharmacists.

Method: A qualitative study was conducted with 24 Australian pharmacists recruited via social media, professional networks, and conferences. Five online focus groups (each with 3-4 participants) were conducted, lasting 45-60 min. Discussions were transcribed verbatim, and data were analysed thematically using the Framework Method. Rigor was ensured through convenience sampling, maintenance of an audit trail, and the use of independent coding and thematic analysis to enhance credibility and confirmability.

Results: Four major themes emerged from the analysis: 'access to information', 'sense of community', 'active facilitation', and 'platform usability'. Participants appreciated peer-shared knowledge and staying informed about current practices. A strong sense of community was cultivated as participants supported by others within the virtual community of practice. Active facilitation, such as moderators filtering content and engaging participants, was essential for maintaining a constructive environment. Additionally, platform usability, characterised by user-friendly features, the ability to keep personal and professional boundaries, and flexibility in accessing activities, significantly enhanced participant engagement.

Conclusion: The study identified four key drivers of engagement in virtual Communities of Practice including accessible information, community support, active facilitation, and platform usability. These findings inform the design of virtual Communities of Practice to enhance professional collaboration and practice. Addressing these factors can enhance virtual Communities of Practice effectiveness in supporting professional collaboration, reducing isolation, and fostering continuous learning, particularly in evolving pharmacy roles.

参与实践的虚拟社区的驱动因素:澳大利亚药剂师的看法和经验的定性研究。
背景:在当今的数字时代,虚拟实践社区允许药剂师跨越地理和专业界限进行联系和协作。这些平台为共享学习和知识交流创造了机会,促进了创新,并帮助药剂师了解不断发展的实践。目的:本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚药剂师参与虚拟实践社区的因素。方法:通过社交媒体、专业网络和会议对24名澳大利亚药师进行定性研究。进行了五个在线焦点小组(每个小组有3-4名参与者),持续时间为45-60分钟。讨论内容逐字记录,并使用框架方法对数据进行主题分析。通过方便抽样、维持审计跟踪和使用独立编码和专题分析以提高可信性和可确认性,确保了严谨性。结果:分析中出现了四个主要主题:“获取信息”、“社区意识”、“积极促进”和“平台可用性”。与会者赞赏同行分享知识和了解当前做法。作为参与者,在虚拟实践社区中得到其他人的支持,培养了强烈的社区意识。积极的促进,如版主过滤内容和吸引参与者,对于维持建设性的环境至关重要。此外,平台的可用性,其特点是用户友好的功能,保持个人和专业界限的能力,以及访问活动的灵活性,大大提高了参与者的参与度。结论:该研究确定了虚拟实践社区参与的四个关键驱动因素,包括可访问信息、社区支持、积极促进和平台可用性。这些发现为虚拟实践社区的设计提供了信息,以加强专业协作和实践。解决这些因素可以提高虚拟实践社区在支持专业协作、减少隔离和促进持续学习方面的有效性,特别是在不断发展的药学角色中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信