Recent advances in understanding the role of antidepressants to manage breathlessness in supportive and palliative care.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Irene J Higginson, Sabrina Bajwah, Małgorzata Krajnik, Caroline J Jolley, David Hui
{"title":"Recent advances in understanding the role of antidepressants to manage breathlessness in supportive and palliative care.","authors":"Irene J Higginson, Sabrina Bajwah, Małgorzata Krajnik, Caroline J Jolley, David Hui","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Breathlessness is a prevalent and distressing symptom in palliative and supportive care, with limited licensed pharmacological options once disease-directed therapies are no longer effective. Antidepressants have been proposed as a potential treatment, even in the absence of comorbid mood disorders, due to their modulation of neural circuits and serotonin pathways involved in breathlessness perception. Despite their off-label use in clinical practice for managing refractory or chronic breathlessness, robust evidence supporting their efficacy is needed. This review critically evaluates the latest evidence on their potential benefits and safety in breathlessness management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Breathlessness is influenced by at least three interrelated axes: lung-brain, behavioural-functional, and psycho-social-spiritual. These mechanisms operate across diseases, making them relevant in palliative and supportive care. Despite promise from early case reports and small trials, two recent large, randomised studies of mirtazapine and sertraline found no benefit in alleviating breathlessness or improving other outcomes. The mirtazapine trial also reported more adverse events than placebo. Earlier trials were small with design limitations, reducing reliability. A 2016 trial of sertraline found benefits for depression in stable COPD. Recent concerns over increased morbidity associated with antidepressant use in respiratory disease highlight the need for early detection of people at risk of worsening breathlessness or depression and a holistic, individualised approach.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Current evidence does not support antidepressants for breathlessness in respiratory disease. Non-pharmacological approaches should be first line, given their proven benefits and low risk. Off-label medicine use requires caution and should ideally be offered within a trial or evaluation. Given the complex nature of breathlessness, future research should focus on innovating and then testing treatments and therapies in well-designed trials with appropriate outcome measures and reporting of adverse events, health care use and informal carer effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":"19 2","pages":"83-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Breathlessness is a prevalent and distressing symptom in palliative and supportive care, with limited licensed pharmacological options once disease-directed therapies are no longer effective. Antidepressants have been proposed as a potential treatment, even in the absence of comorbid mood disorders, due to their modulation of neural circuits and serotonin pathways involved in breathlessness perception. Despite their off-label use in clinical practice for managing refractory or chronic breathlessness, robust evidence supporting their efficacy is needed. This review critically evaluates the latest evidence on their potential benefits and safety in breathlessness management.

Recent findings: Breathlessness is influenced by at least three interrelated axes: lung-brain, behavioural-functional, and psycho-social-spiritual. These mechanisms operate across diseases, making them relevant in palliative and supportive care. Despite promise from early case reports and small trials, two recent large, randomised studies of mirtazapine and sertraline found no benefit in alleviating breathlessness or improving other outcomes. The mirtazapine trial also reported more adverse events than placebo. Earlier trials were small with design limitations, reducing reliability. A 2016 trial of sertraline found benefits for depression in stable COPD. Recent concerns over increased morbidity associated with antidepressant use in respiratory disease highlight the need for early detection of people at risk of worsening breathlessness or depression and a holistic, individualised approach.

Summary: Current evidence does not support antidepressants for breathlessness in respiratory disease. Non-pharmacological approaches should be first line, given their proven benefits and low risk. Off-label medicine use requires caution and should ideally be offered within a trial or evaluation. Given the complex nature of breathlessness, future research should focus on innovating and then testing treatments and therapies in well-designed trials with appropriate outcome measures and reporting of adverse events, health care use and informal carer effects.

了解抗抑郁药在支持和姑息治疗中管理呼吸困难的作用的最新进展。
综述目的:呼吸困难是姑息治疗和支持性治疗中普遍存在的令人痛苦的症状,一旦疾病定向治疗不再有效,许可的药物选择就有限。抗抑郁药被认为是一种潜在的治疗方法,即使在没有共病性情绪障碍的情况下,由于它们调节神经回路和血清素通路,参与呼吸困难的感知。尽管它们在临床实践中用于治疗难治性或慢性呼吸困难,但需要强有力的证据支持其疗效。本综述批判性地评估了它们在呼吸困难管理中的潜在益处和安全性的最新证据。最近的研究发现:呼吸困难至少受到三个相互关联的轴的影响:肺-脑、行为-功能和心理-社会-精神。这些机制适用于各种疾病,使其与姑息治疗和支持性治疗相关。尽管早期的病例报告和小型试验带来了希望,但最近的两项大型随机研究发现,米氮平和舍曲林在缓解呼吸困难或改善其他结果方面没有任何益处。米氮平试验也报告了比安慰剂更多的不良事件。早期的试验规模小,设计有限制,降低了可靠性。2016年的一项试验发现,舍曲林对稳定型COPD患者的抑郁有好处。最近对呼吸系统疾病中使用抗抑郁药相关发病率增加的担忧突出表明,需要早期发现有呼吸困难或抑郁恶化风险的人群,并采取全面、个性化的方法。总结:目前的证据不支持抗抑郁药物治疗呼吸系统疾病患者的呼吸困难。考虑到非药物治疗已被证实的益处和低风险,应首先采用非药物治疗。说明书外药物的使用需要谨慎,最好在试验或评估期间提供。鉴于呼吸困难的复杂性,未来的研究应侧重于创新,然后在设计良好的试验中测试治疗方法和疗法,并采用适当的结果测量和报告不良事件、卫生保健使用和非正式护理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信