Dilation and Evacuation Simulation Model for Learners and Providers Who Offer Abortion Care.

Q3 Medicine
Haven Frazier, Leanne Free, Shana Miles, Matthew Vanbaaren, Adam Levy
{"title":"Dilation and Evacuation Simulation Model for Learners and Providers Who Offer Abortion Care.","authors":"Haven Frazier, Leanne Free, Shana Miles, Matthew Vanbaaren, Adam Levy","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the US, one in four women will have an abortion, and most OB/GYN physicians have had patients who required abortion care. Most second-trimester abortions in the US (95%) are performed via dilation and evacuation (D&E), which requires provider skill and competency. Barriers to obtaining abortion training include opt-in residency programs, location-based legal restrictions, and religiously affiliated institutions. Our D&E simulation is a cost-effective, realistic model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>D&E models were assembled using juice containers, Cornish hens, and Sopher forceps. Thirty-five participants (medical students and OB/GYN residents) completed presimulation surveys and received a brief lecture about abortion demographics, techniques, and complications, followed by the hands-on simulation; 27 completed postsimulation surveys. Participants assessed their comfort levels in performing D&Es and recognizing postabortion complications, and their likelihood of performing D&Es in future clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comfort levels significantly improved pre- to postsimulation, increasing from 32% to 55% (<i>p</i> < .001) for participants reporting feeling <i>somewhat comfortable</i> or <i>extremely comfortable</i> performing D&Es, and increasing from 46% to 63% (<i>p</i> < .01) for participants reporting feeling <i>somewhat comfortable</i> or <i>extremely comfortable</i> recognizing postabortion complications after receiving the introductory lecture. Overall, participants indicated that the simulation was realistic (92%) and increased their knowledge (100%) and ability to perform D&Es (96%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our affordable and simple D&E model can be easily replicated and implemented for training in second-trimester D&E. This model can serve as a valuable and realistic tool for providers with restricted access to clinical abortion who need adjunct training, improving physician education and competency.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"21 ","pages":"11525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the US, one in four women will have an abortion, and most OB/GYN physicians have had patients who required abortion care. Most second-trimester abortions in the US (95%) are performed via dilation and evacuation (D&E), which requires provider skill and competency. Barriers to obtaining abortion training include opt-in residency programs, location-based legal restrictions, and religiously affiliated institutions. Our D&E simulation is a cost-effective, realistic model.

Methods: D&E models were assembled using juice containers, Cornish hens, and Sopher forceps. Thirty-five participants (medical students and OB/GYN residents) completed presimulation surveys and received a brief lecture about abortion demographics, techniques, and complications, followed by the hands-on simulation; 27 completed postsimulation surveys. Participants assessed their comfort levels in performing D&Es and recognizing postabortion complications, and their likelihood of performing D&Es in future clinical practice.

Results: Comfort levels significantly improved pre- to postsimulation, increasing from 32% to 55% (p < .001) for participants reporting feeling somewhat comfortable or extremely comfortable performing D&Es, and increasing from 46% to 63% (p < .01) for participants reporting feeling somewhat comfortable or extremely comfortable recognizing postabortion complications after receiving the introductory lecture. Overall, participants indicated that the simulation was realistic (92%) and increased their knowledge (100%) and ability to perform D&Es (96%).

Discussion: Our affordable and simple D&E model can be easily replicated and implemented for training in second-trimester D&E. This model can serve as a valuable and realistic tool for providers with restricted access to clinical abortion who need adjunct training, improving physician education and competency.

流产护理学习者和提供者的扩张和疏散模拟模型。
简介:在美国,四分之一的女性会堕胎,大多数妇产科医生都有过需要堕胎护理的患者。在美国,大多数中期流产(95%)是通过扩张和疏散(D&E)进行的,这需要提供者的技能和能力。获得堕胎培训的障碍包括可选择的住院医师项目、基于地点的法律限制和宗教附属机构。我们的D&E模拟是一个具有成本效益的、现实的模型。方法:采用果汁容器、康沃尔鸡和索氏钳组装D&E模型。35名参与者(医学院学生和妇产科住院医生)完成了模拟前调查,并听取了关于堕胎人口统计、技术和并发症的简短讲座,然后进行了实际模拟;27人完成模拟后调查。参与者评估了他们在进行d&e和识别流产后并发症时的舒适程度,以及他们在未来临床实践中进行d&e的可能性。结果:模拟前到模拟后的舒适水平显著提高,在进行d&e时感到有些舒适或非常舒适的参与者从32%增加到55% (p < 0.001),在接受介绍讲座后,在识别流产后并发症时感到有些舒适或非常舒适的参与者从46%增加到63% (p < 0.01)。总体而言,参与者表示模拟是真实的(92%),并增加了他们的知识(100%)和执行d&e的能力(96%)。讨论:我们经济实惠且简单的D&E模式可以很容易地复制和实施,用于中期D&E培训。这个模型可以作为一个有价值的和现实的工具,为那些需要辅助培训的有限的临床流产提供者,提高医生的教育和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信