Oral esketamine for patients with severe treatment-resistant depression: Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a six-week open-label treatment program.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jolien Ke Veraart, Sanne Y Smith-Apeldoorn, Annemarie van der Meij, Jan Spijker, Robert A Schoevers, Jeanine Kamphuis
{"title":"Oral esketamine for patients with severe treatment-resistant depression: Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a six-week open-label treatment program.","authors":"Jolien Ke Veraart, Sanne Y Smith-Apeldoorn, Annemarie van der Meij, Jan Spijker, Robert A Schoevers, Jeanine Kamphuis","doi":"10.1177/02698811251332831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral esketamine for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) could offer certain advantages over other routes, such as intravenous or intranasal, but it has not been systematically studied in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Here we present results from a relatively large naturalistic study to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of oral esketamine in patients with TRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred eighty-five adults with severe TRD (average of 8.1 antidepressant trials plus electroconvulsive therapy in 63% without beneficial outcome) received oral esketamine treatment twice-weekly for 6 weeks with individually titrated doses ranging from 0.5 to 3 mg/kg. Outcome measures included change from baseline to week 6 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS<sub>17</sub>), Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), response, remission, self-reported symptom improvement, functioning, and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Oral esketamine treatment improved depressive symptom severity on the HDRS<sub>17</sub> from 21.2 to 15.8 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). MCID, response, and remission rates were 47.1%, 26.8% and 15.6% respectively. In 45.9% of participants, treatment was continued after 6 weeks to maintain initial positive effects. Side effects were reported frequently but were overall well tolerated. The drop-out rate was 7.6%. We found no significant adverse effects associated with urinary tract or cognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeated treatment with oral esketamine is effective in improving depressive symptom severity in highly treatment-resistant depressive patients. It is safe, well tolerated, and patient-friendly. Considering the level of treatment resistance, outcomes were in the range of studies investigating other routes of (es)ketamine administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2698811251332831"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251332831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral esketamine for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) could offer certain advantages over other routes, such as intravenous or intranasal, but it has not been systematically studied in a real-world setting.

Aims: Here we present results from a relatively large naturalistic study to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of oral esketamine in patients with TRD.

Methods: One hundred eighty-five adults with severe TRD (average of 8.1 antidepressant trials plus electroconvulsive therapy in 63% without beneficial outcome) received oral esketamine treatment twice-weekly for 6 weeks with individually titrated doses ranging from 0.5 to 3 mg/kg. Outcome measures included change from baseline to week 6 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17), Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), response, remission, self-reported symptom improvement, functioning, and side effects.

Results: Oral esketamine treatment improved depressive symptom severity on the HDRS17 from 21.2 to 15.8 (p < 0.001). MCID, response, and remission rates were 47.1%, 26.8% and 15.6% respectively. In 45.9% of participants, treatment was continued after 6 weeks to maintain initial positive effects. Side effects were reported frequently but were overall well tolerated. The drop-out rate was 7.6%. We found no significant adverse effects associated with urinary tract or cognition.

Conclusions: Repeated treatment with oral esketamine is effective in improving depressive symptom severity in highly treatment-resistant depressive patients. It is safe, well tolerated, and patient-friendly. Considering the level of treatment resistance, outcomes were in the range of studies investigating other routes of (es)ketamine administration.

重度难治性抑郁症患者口服艾氯胺酮:六周开放治疗方案的有效性、安全性和耐受性
背景:口服艾氯胺酮治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)可能比其他途径(如静脉注射或鼻内)具有一定的优势,但尚未在现实环境中进行系统研究。目的:在这里,我们介绍了一项相对大型的自然研究的结果,以评估口服艾氯胺酮对TRD患者的有效性、耐受性和安全性。方法:185名重度TRD成人患者(平均8.1次抗抑郁药物试验加电惊厥治疗,63%无有益结果)接受艾氯胺酮口服治疗,每周2次,持续6周,剂量从0.5至3mg /kg不等。结果测量包括从基线到第6周汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS17)、最小临床重要差异(MCID)、反应、缓解、自我报告的症状改善、功能和副作用的变化。结果:口服艾氯胺酮可使抑郁症状严重程度从HDRS17的21.2分改善至15.8分(p)。结论:反复口服艾氯胺酮可有效改善高度治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者的抑郁症状严重程度。它安全、耐受性好、对患者友好。考虑到治疗耐药水平,结果在调查其他氯胺酮给药途径的研究范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信