Exploring Gender Differences: Training, Practice, and Family Dynamics Among Fellowship-Trained Neurotologists.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Nadia L Samaha, Maria Armache, Wassim Najjar, Rachel Stemme, Wendy Chen, Leila J Mady, Tiffany P Hwa
{"title":"Exploring Gender Differences: Training, Practice, and Family Dynamics Among Fellowship-Trained Neurotologists.","authors":"Nadia L Samaha, Maria Armache, Wassim Najjar, Rachel Stemme, Wendy Chen, Leila J Mady, Tiffany P Hwa","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize and examine gender differences in training paths, practice patterns, family dynamics, and career trajectories in the field of neurotology.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap) Framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was created and distributed electronically to fellowship-trained neurotologists in the United States who were identified via publicly available information. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 223 neurotologists invited, 80 (35.8%) responded. Most participants were male (77.5%, n = 62), white (77.5%, n = 62), and aged 41 years or older (81.2%, n = 65). Training and practice patterns showed no significant gender differences. However, women were more likely to have a physician spouse (55.6% vs 25.8%, P = .02), have their first child post-fellowship (55.6% vs 24.2%, P = .007), rely on professional childcare (47.1% vs 22.6%, P = .05), and reduce work hours due to childcare needs (22.2% vs 6.45%, P = .05). Men were more likely to rely on their spouse as the primary caretaker (48.4% vs 5.9%, P = .001). Having a physician spouse was associated with post-fellowship childbearing (48.1% vs 28.9%, P = .041) and increased use of professional childcare (44.3% vs 30.1%, P = .05), regardless of gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although training and practice patterns were similar across genders, significant differences in family structure, childbearing, and caretaking roles suggest that women in neurotology may face unique challenges that could influence their career progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize and examine gender differences in training paths, practice patterns, family dynamics, and career trajectories in the field of neurotology.

Study design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap) Framework.

Methods: A survey was created and distributed electronically to fellowship-trained neurotologists in the United States who were identified via publicly available information. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistics were performed.

Results: Of the 223 neurotologists invited, 80 (35.8%) responded. Most participants were male (77.5%, n = 62), white (77.5%, n = 62), and aged 41 years or older (81.2%, n = 65). Training and practice patterns showed no significant gender differences. However, women were more likely to have a physician spouse (55.6% vs 25.8%, P = .02), have their first child post-fellowship (55.6% vs 24.2%, P = .007), rely on professional childcare (47.1% vs 22.6%, P = .05), and reduce work hours due to childcare needs (22.2% vs 6.45%, P = .05). Men were more likely to rely on their spouse as the primary caretaker (48.4% vs 5.9%, P = .001). Having a physician spouse was associated with post-fellowship childbearing (48.1% vs 28.9%, P = .041) and increased use of professional childcare (44.3% vs 30.1%, P = .05), regardless of gender.

Conclusion: Although training and practice patterns were similar across genders, significant differences in family structure, childbearing, and caretaking roles suggest that women in neurotology may face unique challenges that could influence their career progression.

探索性别差异:培训,实践和家庭动态在奖学金训练的神经学家。
目的:探讨神经病学在培训路径、实践模式、家庭动态和职业轨迹方面的性别差异。研究设计:横断面调查。设置:研究电子数据捕获(RedCap)框架。方法:创建了一项调查,并通过电子方式分发给通过公开信息确定的美国接受过奖学金培训的神经学家。进行描述性、单变量和多变量统计。结果:共邀请223名神经科医生,回复80名(35.8%)。大多数参与者为男性(77.5%,n = 62),白人(77.5%,n = 62),年龄在41岁及以上(81.2%,n = 65)。训练和实践模式没有明显的性别差异。然而,女性更有可能拥有医生配偶(55.6%对25.8%,P = 0.02),在毕业后生育第一个孩子(55.6%对24.2%,P = 0.007),依赖专业儿童保育(47.1%对22.6%,P = 0.05),并因儿童保育需求而减少工作时间(22.2%对6.45%,P = 0.05)。男性更倾向于依赖配偶作为主要的照顾者(48.4% vs 5.9%, P = .001)。无论性别如何,拥有医生配偶与毕业后生育(48.1% vs 28.9%, P = 0.041)和增加专业托儿服务的使用(44.3% vs 30.1%, P = 0.05)相关。结论:尽管培训和实践模式在性别上是相似的,但在家庭结构、生育和照顾角色上的显著差异表明,神经病学女性可能面临可能影响其职业发展的独特挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信