Measures of nutrition intake and growth reported in preterm nutrition studies: A scoping review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Meiliana Meiliana, Frank H Bloomfield, Jane E Harding, Luling Lin
{"title":"Measures of nutrition intake and growth reported in preterm nutrition studies: A scoping review.","authors":"Meiliana Meiliana, Frank H Bloomfield, Jane E Harding, Luling Lin","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are inconsistent recommendations in available guidelines and uncertainty regarding the exact nutrient requirements for preterm infants, partly because of inconsistent outcome reporting in nutrition intervention studies. To support development of a minimum reporting set, we undertook a scoping review to identify measures of nutrition intake and growth outcomes reported in recent preterm nutrition studies. We searched for publications from 2018 to 2023 reporting individuals born preterm at any gestational age and study location whose nutrition intake was assessed before first hospital discharge and whose growth was assessed at any age. One reviewer screened articles and extracted the measures. Any uncertainties were resolved by a second reviewer. The results were tabulated and analyzed descriptively. We identified 6365 records, and included 250 studies. Only 10 of 236 studies (4%) reported how nutrition intake was calculated. There were five different ways of reporting weight and 13 of weight gain, each at many different time points. Furthermore, 27 of 105 studies (26%) did not report how weight gain was calculated, and those that did reported five different calculation methods. Our findings demonstrate significant variation and incomplete reporting of nutrition intake and growth outcomes in preterm nutrition studies. This lack of standardization limits the utility of existing evidence and highlights the need for a standardized reporting framework to improve comparability and support evidence-based guidelines in preterm nutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are inconsistent recommendations in available guidelines and uncertainty regarding the exact nutrient requirements for preterm infants, partly because of inconsistent outcome reporting in nutrition intervention studies. To support development of a minimum reporting set, we undertook a scoping review to identify measures of nutrition intake and growth outcomes reported in recent preterm nutrition studies. We searched for publications from 2018 to 2023 reporting individuals born preterm at any gestational age and study location whose nutrition intake was assessed before first hospital discharge and whose growth was assessed at any age. One reviewer screened articles and extracted the measures. Any uncertainties were resolved by a second reviewer. The results were tabulated and analyzed descriptively. We identified 6365 records, and included 250 studies. Only 10 of 236 studies (4%) reported how nutrition intake was calculated. There were five different ways of reporting weight and 13 of weight gain, each at many different time points. Furthermore, 27 of 105 studies (26%) did not report how weight gain was calculated, and those that did reported five different calculation methods. Our findings demonstrate significant variation and incomplete reporting of nutrition intake and growth outcomes in preterm nutrition studies. This lack of standardization limits the utility of existing evidence and highlights the need for a standardized reporting framework to improve comparability and support evidence-based guidelines in preterm nutrition.

在早产儿营养研究中报道的营养摄入和生长的测量:范围综述。
现有指南的建议不一致,早产儿的确切营养需求也不确定,部分原因是营养干预研究的结果报告不一致。为了支持最小报告集的发展,我们进行了范围审查,以确定近期早产儿营养研究中报告的营养摄入和生长结果的测量方法。我们检索了2018年至2023年的出版物,这些出版物报道了在任何胎龄和研究地点出生的早产儿,其营养摄入在首次出院前进行了评估,并在任何年龄对其生长进行了评估。一位审稿人筛选了文章并提取了测量值。任何不确定因素由第二位审稿人解决。将结果制成表格并进行描述性分析。我们确定了6365条记录,包括250项研究。236项研究中只有10项(4%)报告了如何计算营养摄入量。报告体重的方法有5种,体重增加的方法有13种,每一种都在许多不同的时间点。此外,105项研究中有27项(26%)没有报告如何计算体重增加,而那些报告了五种不同的计算方法。我们的研究结果表明,在早产儿营养研究中,营养摄入和生长结果存在显著差异和不完整的报告。缺乏标准化限制了现有证据的利用,并强调需要一个标准化的报告框架,以提高可比性,并支持早产儿营养的循证指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信