Neurointervention-from entry to expertise: Examining gender bias across different training access routes in Europe.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Helena Guerreiro, Anne-Christine Januel, Franziska Dorn, Riitta Rautio, Anna A Kyselyova, Razvan Alexandru Radu, João Reis, Jens Fiehler, Isabel Fragata
{"title":"Neurointervention-from entry to expertise: Examining gender bias across different training access routes in Europe.","authors":"Helena Guerreiro, Anne-Christine Januel, Franziska Dorn, Riitta Rautio, Anna A Kyselyova, Razvan Alexandru Radu, João Reis, Jens Fiehler, Isabel Fragata","doi":"10.1177/15910199251336928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background/purposeGender bias in academic medicine has been widely described. In Europe, training and career pathways in neurointervention (NI) are heterogeneous. We hypothesize that the access route to neuroradiology specialty and NI subspecialty may correlate with the proportion of women in the field and with their career progression.MethodsAn online survey consisting of 18 questions was distributed through European professional societies and several online social platforms. A total of 422 responses from 54 different countries were collected and statistically evaluated.ResultsAccess routes to specialty and subspecialty did not correlate with the number of women practicing NI. However, men were significantly more likely to have children, to occupy leading positions, to have more clinical experience and higher weekly workload both in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology. Female gender significantly affected career progression.ConclusionThis study reflects a positive change in European reality concerning gender bias. Distinct training access routes do not seem to affect the proportion of female neurointerventionalists. However, gender differences still negatively impact women NI careers, leading to lower workload, having less children, and a limited access to leading positions in NI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251336928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251336928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/purposeGender bias in academic medicine has been widely described. In Europe, training and career pathways in neurointervention (NI) are heterogeneous. We hypothesize that the access route to neuroradiology specialty and NI subspecialty may correlate with the proportion of women in the field and with their career progression.MethodsAn online survey consisting of 18 questions was distributed through European professional societies and several online social platforms. A total of 422 responses from 54 different countries were collected and statistically evaluated.ResultsAccess routes to specialty and subspecialty did not correlate with the number of women practicing NI. However, men were significantly more likely to have children, to occupy leading positions, to have more clinical experience and higher weekly workload both in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology. Female gender significantly affected career progression.ConclusionThis study reflects a positive change in European reality concerning gender bias. Distinct training access routes do not seem to affect the proportion of female neurointerventionalists. However, gender differences still negatively impact women NI careers, leading to lower workload, having less children, and a limited access to leading positions in NI.

神经干预-从入门到专业:检查欧洲不同培训途径中的性别偏见。
背景/目的医学学术中的性别偏见已被广泛描述。在欧洲,神经干预(NI)的培训和职业路径是不同的。我们假设进入神经放射学专业和NI亚专业的途径可能与女性在该领域的比例和她们的职业发展有关。方法通过欧洲专业学会和多个在线社交平台进行在线调查,共包含18个问题。总共收集了来自54个不同国家的422份回复,并进行了统计评估。结果专科及亚专科就诊途径与女性NI执业人数无关。然而,在诊断和介入神经放射学方面,男性更有可能有孩子,占据领导地位,有更多的临床经验和更高的每周工作量。女性性别显著影响职业发展。结论本研究反映了欧洲性别偏见现实的积极变化。不同的训练途径似乎并不影响女性神经介入医师的比例。然而,性别差异仍然对女性NI职业产生负面影响,导致工作量减少,孩子少,以及在NI中担任领导职位的机会有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信