Assessment of Training Barriers Among Underserved Virginia Value-added Food Producers: A Proposed Structure for Improving Parity in Food Safety Educational Interventions

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Katheryn Parraga , Liv Huselton , Mohamed Salem , Xinlei Zhang , Tiffany Drape , Chyer Kim , Alexis M. Hamilton
{"title":"Assessment of Training Barriers Among Underserved Virginia Value-added Food Producers: A Proposed Structure for Improving Parity in Food Safety Educational Interventions","authors":"Katheryn Parraga ,&nbsp;Liv Huselton ,&nbsp;Mohamed Salem ,&nbsp;Xinlei Zhang ,&nbsp;Tiffany Drape ,&nbsp;Chyer Kim ,&nbsp;Alexis M. Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food manufacturing businesses, regardless of size, must comply with appropriate food safety education requirements, but guidance on effectively training small, minority-owned producers is lacking in key areas, such as preferred formats and knowledge of current perceived barriers to compliance. This study aimed to understand the greatest barriers to knowledge gain and behavior change for underserved value-added food producers in Virginia. An anonymous 10-question survey was administered to Virginia food producers through various channels, including email links, flyers, electronic tablets, or physical copies provided in person. The survey queried demographic information about the producer, factors that inhibited their learning, and suggestions for improved education and outreach. Responses (<em>n</em> = 124) were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression in RStudio version 4.2.3. The results indicated that many producers identify location as the primary barrier to attending and learning about food safety, followed by the frequency of available training events. Additionally, the three preferred learning tools for producers were factsheets, interactive sessions with trainers and/or materials, and prerecorded videos. While there is no single method to meet all the needs related to food safety training for small producers, it is crucial for Cooperative Extension to consider these factors when planning food safety training and workshops to ensure broader outreach to more producers to achieve parity in food safety education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 7","pages":"Article 100527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food manufacturing businesses, regardless of size, must comply with appropriate food safety education requirements, but guidance on effectively training small, minority-owned producers is lacking in key areas, such as preferred formats and knowledge of current perceived barriers to compliance. This study aimed to understand the greatest barriers to knowledge gain and behavior change for underserved value-added food producers in Virginia. An anonymous 10-question survey was administered to Virginia food producers through various channels, including email links, flyers, electronic tablets, or physical copies provided in person. The survey queried demographic information about the producer, factors that inhibited their learning, and suggestions for improved education and outreach. Responses (n = 124) were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression in RStudio version 4.2.3. The results indicated that many producers identify location as the primary barrier to attending and learning about food safety, followed by the frequency of available training events. Additionally, the three preferred learning tools for producers were factsheets, interactive sessions with trainers and/or materials, and prerecorded videos. While there is no single method to meet all the needs related to food safety training for small producers, it is crucial for Cooperative Extension to consider these factors when planning food safety training and workshops to ensure broader outreach to more producers to achieve parity in food safety education.
评估弗吉尼亚州服务不足的增值食品生产商之间的培训障碍:一个拟议的结构,以提高食品安全教育干预的平等。
食品生产企业,无论规模大小,都必须遵守适当的食品安全教育要求,但在关键领域缺乏有效培训小型少数民族生产者的指导,例如首选的形式和对当前合规障碍的了解。本研究旨在了解弗吉尼亚州服务不足的增值食品生产商获取知识和改变行为的最大障碍。通过各种渠道,包括电子邮件链接、传单、电子平板电脑或亲自提供的实物副本,对弗吉尼亚州的食品生产商进行了一项10个问题的匿名调查。该调查询问了有关生产者的人口统计信息,阻碍他们学习的因素,以及改善教育和推广的建议。在RStudio 4.2.3版本中使用描述性统计和逻辑回归对应答(n=124)进行分析。结果表明,许多生产者认为地点是参加和学习食品安全的主要障碍,其次是可用培训活动的频率。此外,制作人首选的三种学习工具是实况介绍、与培训师的互动会议和/或材料以及预先录制的视频。虽然没有单一的方法可以满足小生产者对食品安全培训的所有需要,但在规划食品安全培训和讲习班时,合作社推广必须考虑到这些因素,以确保更广泛地接触更多的生产者,实现食品安全教育方面的平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信