Use of Heart-Rate Variability to Examine Readiness to Perform in Response to Overload and Taper in Swimmers.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Karla R Bulte, Lyndell Bruce, Kristal Hammond, Sean L Corrigan, Luana C Main
{"title":"Use of Heart-Rate Variability to Examine Readiness to Perform in Response to Overload and Taper in Swimmers.","authors":"Karla R Bulte, Lyndell Bruce, Kristal Hammond, Sean L Corrigan, Luana C Main","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong> The lack of consensus on the best approach to assess the fatigue and readiness status of swimmers has led to an increased risk of maladaptation, overtraining, and suboptimal readiness to perform. Subjective athlete monitoring is prominent in swimming but is prone to bias, distortion, and misinterpretation. Heart-rate variability (HRV) has gained attention from swimming practitioners as an objective monitoring tool for assessing physiological status.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the validity of HRV in detecting changes in physiological status between overload, recovery, and taper training phases in elite swimmers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven state- to international-level swimmers were recruited for the study. Retrospective routine HRV, training, and competition data were accessed for 5 months leading into the Tokyo 2020 Olympics national trials. Linear mixed models examined the relationship between training phase, swimming performance, and 3 HRV metrics (average of all normal R-R intervals [AVNN], root mean square of successive R-R intervals [rMSSD], and rMSSD/AVNN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>rMSSD/AVNN was significantly higher in overload training compared with regular training (mean difference = 0.020, P = .002; effect size = moderate). No statistical difference was found for rMSSD or AVNN between training phases (P > .05). Descriptive analyses revealed intraindividual and interindividual variability in HRV response to training phase. Successful swimmers reported higher parasympathetic dominance in early taper followed by increased sympathetic activity leading into competition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that a ratio measure between parasympathetic tone and modulation may provide a more comprehensive evaluation of an athlete's physiological status compared with a sole parasympathetic modulation or tone marker. Further research is recommended to improve our understanding of the autonomic nervous system's response to overload and taper training phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context:  The lack of consensus on the best approach to assess the fatigue and readiness status of swimmers has led to an increased risk of maladaptation, overtraining, and suboptimal readiness to perform. Subjective athlete monitoring is prominent in swimming but is prone to bias, distortion, and misinterpretation. Heart-rate variability (HRV) has gained attention from swimming practitioners as an objective monitoring tool for assessing physiological status.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the validity of HRV in detecting changes in physiological status between overload, recovery, and taper training phases in elite swimmers.

Methods: Eleven state- to international-level swimmers were recruited for the study. Retrospective routine HRV, training, and competition data were accessed for 5 months leading into the Tokyo 2020 Olympics national trials. Linear mixed models examined the relationship between training phase, swimming performance, and 3 HRV metrics (average of all normal R-R intervals [AVNN], root mean square of successive R-R intervals [rMSSD], and rMSSD/AVNN).

Results: rMSSD/AVNN was significantly higher in overload training compared with regular training (mean difference = 0.020, P = .002; effect size = moderate). No statistical difference was found for rMSSD or AVNN between training phases (P > .05). Descriptive analyses revealed intraindividual and interindividual variability in HRV response to training phase. Successful swimmers reported higher parasympathetic dominance in early taper followed by increased sympathetic activity leading into competition.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that a ratio measure between parasympathetic tone and modulation may provide a more comprehensive evaluation of an athlete's physiological status compared with a sole parasympathetic modulation or tone marker. Further research is recommended to improve our understanding of the autonomic nervous system's response to overload and taper training phases.

使用心率变异性来检查游泳者在超负荷和逐渐减少时的准备状态。
背景:对评估游泳运动员疲劳和准备状态的最佳方法缺乏共识,导致适应不良、过度训练和未达到最佳准备状态的风险增加。运动员的主观监测在游泳运动中很突出,但容易产生偏见、扭曲和误解。心率变异性(HRV)作为评估生理状态的客观监测工具已受到游泳从业者的关注。目的:本研究的目的是探讨心率变异在检测优秀游泳运动员在过载、恢复和逐渐减少训练阶段生理状态变化方面的有效性。方法:招募11名国家级至国际级游泳运动员进行研究。在2020年东京奥运会全国选拔赛之前的5个月里,对常规HRV、训练和比赛数据进行了回顾性访问。线性混合模型检验了训练阶段、游泳表现和3个HRV指标(所有正常R-R区间的平均值[AVNN]、连续R-R区间的均方根[rMSSD]和rMSSD/AVNN)之间的关系。结果:负荷训练中rMSSD/AVNN得分显著高于常规训练(平均差异= 0.020,P = 0.002;效应大小=中等)。rMSSD和AVNN在训练阶段之间无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。描述性分析揭示了训练阶段HRV反应的个体内和个体间差异。成功的游泳运动员报告说,在比赛开始的早期,副交感神经的支配地位较高,随后交感神经活动增加。结论:研究结果表明,与单一的副交感神经调节或音调标记相比,副交感神经张力和调节之间的比值测量可以更全面地评估运动员的生理状态。建议进一步研究以提高我们对自主神经系统对过载和逐渐减少训练阶段的反应的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信