Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Treated with Carbapenem Versus Non-carbapenem Therapy for AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study.
Shuroug A Alowais, Atheer Aldairem, Sumaya N Almohareb, Yara Alsaeed, Rema Aldugiem, Tariq Alqahtani, Rawnd Alamri, Raghad Aied, Hisham A Badreldin, Khalid Bin Saleh
{"title":"Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Treated with Carbapenem Versus Non-carbapenem Therapy for AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Shuroug A Alowais, Atheer Aldairem, Sumaya N Almohareb, Yara Alsaeed, Rema Aldugiem, Tariq Alqahtani, Rawnd Alamri, Raghad Aied, Hisham A Badreldin, Khalid Bin Saleh","doi":"10.1007/s40121-025-01133-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inducible AmpC β-lactamases in Gram-negative Enterobacterales pose therapeutic challenges. Although carbapenems are the preferred treatment, other antibiotics can serve as a viable alternative. Studies comparing treatment options report varied outcomes. This study evaluates 30-day mortality, treatment failure, and length of hospitalization in patients with AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with bacteremia caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. Exclusion criteria included: therapy duration < 72 h, coinfection, resistant isolates, and death within 72 h of diagnosis. Patients were divided into definitive carbapenem and noncarbapenem therapy. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, while secondary outcomes evaluated treatment failure and length of hospitalization. Statistical analysis used descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 214 screened patients, 80 met the inclusion criteria. Enterobacter cloacae (60%) was the predominant pathogen, primarily originating from line-related infections (55%). Carbapenems were the primary empirical (45%) and definitive (75%) therapies; 30-day mortality was higher in the non-carbapenem group (20% versus 3.3%, p = 0.08). Treatment failure was significantly higher in the non-carbapenem group (20% versus 1.6%, p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was longer in the carbapenem group (26 ± 38.40 days) than the non-carbapenem group (11.15 ± 7.15 days, p = 0.87). Older age was significantly associated with higher mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.98-12.20, p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carbapenem use was significantly associated with improved survival, highlighting its importance in treatment strategies. Age significantly affects survival, stressing the need for personalized treatments. Further research and strategies are needed to address clinical failures and enhance antimicrobial stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1061-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01133-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Inducible AmpC β-lactamases in Gram-negative Enterobacterales pose therapeutic challenges. Although carbapenems are the preferred treatment, other antibiotics can serve as a viable alternative. Studies comparing treatment options report varied outcomes. This study evaluates 30-day mortality, treatment failure, and length of hospitalization in patients with AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with bacteremia caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. Exclusion criteria included: therapy duration < 72 h, coinfection, resistant isolates, and death within 72 h of diagnosis. Patients were divided into definitive carbapenem and noncarbapenem therapy. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, while secondary outcomes evaluated treatment failure and length of hospitalization. Statistical analysis used descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and logistic regression.
Results: Of 214 screened patients, 80 met the inclusion criteria. Enterobacter cloacae (60%) was the predominant pathogen, primarily originating from line-related infections (55%). Carbapenems were the primary empirical (45%) and definitive (75%) therapies; 30-day mortality was higher in the non-carbapenem group (20% versus 3.3%, p = 0.08). Treatment failure was significantly higher in the non-carbapenem group (20% versus 1.6%, p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was longer in the carbapenem group (26 ± 38.40 days) than the non-carbapenem group (11.15 ± 7.15 days, p = 0.87). Older age was significantly associated with higher mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.98-12.20, p = 0.015).
Conclusions: Carbapenem use was significantly associated with improved survival, highlighting its importance in treatment strategies. Age significantly affects survival, stressing the need for personalized treatments. Further research and strategies are needed to address clinical failures and enhance antimicrobial stewardship.
在革兰氏阴性肠杆菌中诱导AmpC β-内酰胺酶提出了治疗挑战。虽然碳青霉烯类药物是首选的治疗方法,但其他抗生素也可以作为可行的替代方法。比较治疗方案的研究报告了不同的结果。本研究评估了产ampc肠杆菌菌血症患者的30天死亡率、治疗失败和住院时间。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了由产ampc肠杆菌引起的菌血症的成年患者。排除标准包括:治疗时间结果:214例筛查患者中,80例符合纳入标准。阴沟肠杆菌(60%)是主要病原体,主要来自系相关感染(55%)。碳青霉烯类药物是主要的经验性治疗(45%)和决定性治疗(75%);非碳青霉烯组30天死亡率更高(20% vs 3.3%, p = 0.08)。非碳青霉烯组的治疗失败率明显更高(20% vs 1.6%)。结论:碳青霉烯的使用与生存率的提高显著相关,突出了其在治疗策略中的重要性。年龄显著影响生存,强调个性化治疗的必要性。需要进一步的研究和战略来解决临床失败和加强抗微生物药物管理。
期刊介绍:
Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.