Factors Influencing Community Pharmacists' Participation in Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Inquiry.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13020056
Tasneem Rizvi, Syed Tabish R Zaidi, Mackenzie Williams, Angus Thompson, Gregory M Peterson
{"title":"Factors Influencing Community Pharmacists' Participation in Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Inquiry.","authors":"Tasneem Rizvi, Syed Tabish R Zaidi, Mackenzie Williams, Angus Thompson, Gregory M Peterson","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13020056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Very few studies, all employing surveys, have investigated the perceptions of community pharmacists regarding antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). A qualitative inquiry exploring factors affecting community pharmacists' participation in AMS may assist in the implementation of AMS in the primary care setting. This study aimed to explore the perceived barriers and enablers of community pharmacists' participation in AMS. One-on-one semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of community pharmacists from across Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Analysis method. Twenty community pharmacists (70% female), representing urban, regional, and remote areas of Australia participated in the study. Pharmacists identified a discord between clinical needs of patients and practice policies as the primary source of excessive prescribing and dispensing of antibiotics. The fragmented nature of the primary healthcare system in Australia was seen as limiting information exchange between community pharmacists and general practitioners about antibiotic use, that was encouraging inappropriate and, at times, unsupervised use of antibiotics. The existing community pharmacy funding model in Australia, where individual pharmacists do not benefit from any financial incentives associated with clinical interventions, was also discouraging their participation in AMS. Pharmacists suggested restricting default antibiotic repeat supplies, reducing legal validity of antibiotic prescriptions to less than the current 12 months, and adopting a treatment duration-based approach to antibiotic prescribing instead of the 'quantity-based' approach, where the quantity prescribed is linked to the available pack size of the antibiotic. Structural changes in the way antibiotics are prescribed, dispensed, and funded in the Australian primary care setting are urgently needed to discourage their misuse by the public. Modifications to the current funding model for pharmacist-led cognitive services are needed to motivate pharmacists to participate in AMS initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12030745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13020056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Very few studies, all employing surveys, have investigated the perceptions of community pharmacists regarding antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). A qualitative inquiry exploring factors affecting community pharmacists' participation in AMS may assist in the implementation of AMS in the primary care setting. This study aimed to explore the perceived barriers and enablers of community pharmacists' participation in AMS. One-on-one semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of community pharmacists from across Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Analysis method. Twenty community pharmacists (70% female), representing urban, regional, and remote areas of Australia participated in the study. Pharmacists identified a discord between clinical needs of patients and practice policies as the primary source of excessive prescribing and dispensing of antibiotics. The fragmented nature of the primary healthcare system in Australia was seen as limiting information exchange between community pharmacists and general practitioners about antibiotic use, that was encouraging inappropriate and, at times, unsupervised use of antibiotics. The existing community pharmacy funding model in Australia, where individual pharmacists do not benefit from any financial incentives associated with clinical interventions, was also discouraging their participation in AMS. Pharmacists suggested restricting default antibiotic repeat supplies, reducing legal validity of antibiotic prescriptions to less than the current 12 months, and adopting a treatment duration-based approach to antibiotic prescribing instead of the 'quantity-based' approach, where the quantity prescribed is linked to the available pack size of the antibiotic. Structural changes in the way antibiotics are prescribed, dispensed, and funded in the Australian primary care setting are urgently needed to discourage their misuse by the public. Modifications to the current funding model for pharmacist-led cognitive services are needed to motivate pharmacists to participate in AMS initiatives.

影响社区药师参与抗菌药物管理的因素:一项定性调查。
很少有研究,所有采用调查,调查了社区药剂师对抗菌药物管理(AMS)的看法。质性调查探讨影响社区药剂师参与辅助医疗服务的因素,可能有助于辅助医疗服务在初级保健机构的实施。本研究旨在探讨社区药师参与医疗辅助服务的障碍和促进因素。对来自澳大利亚各地的社区药剂师进行了一对一的半结构化电话采访。访谈被逐字记录下来,并使用框架分析法进行分析。来自澳大利亚城市、地区和偏远地区的20名社区药剂师(70%为女性)参与了这项研究。药剂师确定了患者临床需求与实践政策之间的不协调,这是过度开处方和分配抗生素的主要原因。澳大利亚初级卫生保健系统的分散性质被视为限制了社区药剂师和全科医生之间关于抗生素使用的信息交流,这鼓励了不适当的,有时是无监督的抗生素使用。澳大利亚现有的社区药房资助模式,个人药剂师不受益于任何与临床干预相关的财政激励,也阻碍了他们参与辅助医疗服务。药剂师建议限制默认的抗生素重复供应,将抗生素处方的法定有效期减少到目前的12个月以下,并采用基于治疗持续时间的方法来开具抗生素处方,而不是“基于数量”的方法,在这种方法中,处方的数量与抗生素的可用包装大小有关。澳大利亚初级保健机构迫切需要对抗生素的处方、分配和资助方式进行结构性改革,以阻止公众滥用抗生素。需要修改目前药剂师主导的认知服务的资助模式,以激励药剂师参与辅助医疗服务的倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信