Effect of different blood flow restriction training regimens combined with low-intensity training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Meiling Ren, Guangshen Xian, Xiangchao Tan, Shaocheng Sun, Ming Zhang
{"title":"Effect of different blood flow restriction training regimens combined with low-intensity training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Meiling Ren, Guangshen Xian, Xiangchao Tan, Shaocheng Sun, Ming Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1587876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults are experiencing a gradual decline in physical function as they age. Previous studies have shown that blood flow restriction (BFR) combined with low-intensity training can improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. However, it remains unclear which training regimen is the most effective. This study aims to investigate the effects of different BFR regimens combined with low-intensity training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and CNKI were searched up to March 2025 to select eligible studies. The randomized controlled trials that explored the effects of BFR training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 studies with 626 participants were included. The results of this network meta-analysis showed that: 1) in terms of improving muscle strength: compared to the controls, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was significantly related to one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.81-1.08 <i>P</i> < 0.05]. Moreover, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training was associated with increased muscle cross-sectional area [WMD = 0.50,95% CI (-0.10,1.11), <i>P</i> > 0.05] and isometric muscle strength [WMD = 1.44,95% CI (0.75,2.12), <i>P</i> < 0.05]; 2) in terms of cardiovascular health: compared to the controls, BFR training regimens at different pressures and frequencies were not linked to changes in heart rate in older adults (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Moreover, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was associated with increased systolic blood pressure [WMD = 3.40, 95%CI (0.61,6.19), <i>P</i> < 0.05] and diastolic blood pressure [WMD = 13.40, 95%CI (8.96,17.84), <i>P</i> < 0.05] in older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training may serve as the optimal regimen to improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. <b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, <b>Registration</b> and protocol CRD42024534387.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1587876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1587876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Older adults are experiencing a gradual decline in physical function as they age. Previous studies have shown that blood flow restriction (BFR) combined with low-intensity training can improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. However, it remains unclear which training regimen is the most effective. This study aims to investigate the effects of different BFR regimens combined with low-intensity training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults.
Method: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and CNKI were searched up to March 2025 to select eligible studies. The randomized controlled trials that explored the effects of BFR training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults were included.
Results: A total of 18 studies with 626 participants were included. The results of this network meta-analysis showed that: 1) in terms of improving muscle strength: compared to the controls, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was significantly related to one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.81-1.08 P < 0.05]. Moreover, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training was associated with increased muscle cross-sectional area [WMD = 0.50,95% CI (-0.10,1.11), P > 0.05] and isometric muscle strength [WMD = 1.44,95% CI (0.75,2.12), P < 0.05]; 2) in terms of cardiovascular health: compared to the controls, BFR training regimens at different pressures and frequencies were not linked to changes in heart rate in older adults (P > 0.05). Moreover, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was associated with increased systolic blood pressure [WMD = 3.40, 95%CI (0.61,6.19), P < 0.05] and diastolic blood pressure [WMD = 13.40, 95%CI (8.96,17.84), P < 0.05] in older adults.
Conclusion: Based on the results, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training may serve as the optimal regimen to improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, Registration and protocol CRD42024534387.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.