Prevalence and Association of Defense Mechanisms With Common Psychiatric Disorders: A National Study.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Carlos Blanco, Leonie Kampe, Melanie M Wall, Shuai Wang, Eve Caligor, Mark Olfson
{"title":"Prevalence and Association of Defense Mechanisms With Common Psychiatric Disorders: A National Study.","authors":"Carlos Blanco, Leonie Kampe, Melanie M Wall, Shuai Wang, Eve Caligor, Mark Olfson","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24m15582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Although defense mechanisms are central concepts in psychiatry, whether individual disorders (or categories of disorders) are associated with a specific profile of defense mechanisms or whether defense mechanisms are general markers of severity of psychopathology is unknown.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> We drew on data from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (N = 43,093) to investigate associations of 12 pathological defense mechanisms with mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Logistic regressions were fit with mental disorders as predictors, defense mechanisms as outcomes, and respondent age, sex, and race/ethnicity as covariates.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Compared to individuals with no disorders, those with mood, anxiety, or substance use disorders generally had a higher prevalence of defense mechanisms. Specifically, the prevalence of any pathological mechanism was 30.0% (95% CI, 29.4%-30.7%) for individuals with no disorders, 67.6% (95% CI, 65.9%-69.2%) for individuals with mood disorders, 62.8% (95% CI, 61.3%-64.2%) for individuals with anxiety disorders, and 49.8% (95% CI, 48.7%-51.0%) for individuals with substance use disorders. Broad diagnostic categories or individual psychiatric disorders were not associated with specific defense profiles.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings suggest that defense mechanisms and psychiatric disorders represent correlated but different dimensions of psychopathology, which may respond to different treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"86 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although defense mechanisms are central concepts in psychiatry, whether individual disorders (or categories of disorders) are associated with a specific profile of defense mechanisms or whether defense mechanisms are general markers of severity of psychopathology is unknown.

Methods: We drew on data from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (N = 43,093) to investigate associations of 12 pathological defense mechanisms with mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Logistic regressions were fit with mental disorders as predictors, defense mechanisms as outcomes, and respondent age, sex, and race/ethnicity as covariates.

Results: Compared to individuals with no disorders, those with mood, anxiety, or substance use disorders generally had a higher prevalence of defense mechanisms. Specifically, the prevalence of any pathological mechanism was 30.0% (95% CI, 29.4%-30.7%) for individuals with no disorders, 67.6% (95% CI, 65.9%-69.2%) for individuals with mood disorders, 62.8% (95% CI, 61.3%-64.2%) for individuals with anxiety disorders, and 49.8% (95% CI, 48.7%-51.0%) for individuals with substance use disorders. Broad diagnostic categories or individual psychiatric disorders were not associated with specific defense profiles.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that defense mechanisms and psychiatric disorders represent correlated but different dimensions of psychopathology, which may respond to different treatment approaches.

防御机制与常见精神疾病的流行及其关联:一项全国性研究。
目的:尽管防御机制是精神病学的核心概念,但个体疾病(或疾病类别)是否与防御机制的特定特征相关,或者防御机制是否是精神病理严重程度的一般标志尚不清楚。方法:我们利用来自全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查(N = 43093)的数据来调查12种病理性防御机制与情绪、焦虑和物质使用障碍的关系。Logistic回归拟合以精神障碍为预测因子,防御机制为结果,被调查者的年龄、性别和种族/民族为协变量。结果:与没有障碍的个体相比,那些有情绪、焦虑或物质使用障碍的个体通常具有更高的防御机制患病率。具体而言,任何病理机制的患病率在无障碍个体中为30.0% (95% CI, 29.4%-30.7%),在情绪障碍个体中为67.6% (95% CI, 65.9%-69.2%),在焦虑症个体中为62.8% (95% CI, 61.3%-64.2%),在物质使用障碍个体中为49.8% (95% CI, 48.7%-51.0%)。广泛的诊断类别或个体精神疾病与特定的防御档案无关。结论:心理防御机制与精神障碍在精神病理中表现出相关但不同的维度,可能对不同的治疗方法有反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信