Incidence and predisposing factors associated with peri-intubation cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Nattikarn Meelarp, Wachira Wongtanasarasin
{"title":"Incidence and predisposing factors associated with peri-intubation cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nattikarn Meelarp, Wachira Wongtanasarasin","doi":"10.4103/tjem.tjem_232_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Various studies have delved into its incidence and risk factors, but a comprehensive meta-analysis exploring this life-threatening complication during emergent endotracheal intubation has been lacking. This study quantitatively assesses the global incidence and associated risk factors of peri-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to October 28, 2024. Two independent authors searched, reviewed, and evaluated selected studies. Any peer-reviewed published studies reporting the incidence of PICA among adults (≥18 years) outside of the operating theater were included. Studies reporting incidence within heterogeneous populations or from overlapping groups were excluded. The primary outcome focused on determining the global incidence of PICA, while the secondary outcome addressed associated risk factors. A random-effects model was used to aggregate overall incidence rates. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to examine PICA incidence in different locations and with the study's sample size. The publication bias was assessed via Egger's test and visualization of the funnel plot. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. PICA incidence varied from 0.5% to 23.3%. The estimated pooled incidence was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-3.6) across PICA in the emergency department (ED) (2.5%, 95% CI: 1.4-3.7) and outside of the ED (2.9%, 95% CI: 2.2-3.6). Egger's test yielded <i>P</i> = 0.009, indicating potential publication bias due to small-study effects, as suggested by the funnel plot. Meta-regression analysis revealed higher incidence in studies with smaller populations. Notably, preintubation hypotension, hypoxemia, and body mass index were found to be the most associated risk factors for PICA. Additionally, there was significant variability in PICA definitions, ranging from immediate to occurrences within 60 min after intubation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PICA occurrences during emergent endotracheal intubation reached up to 3%, showing a similar rate both within and outside the ED. While limitations such as heterogeneity and potential bias exist, these findings underscore the imperative for prospective research. Prospective studies are warranted to further delineate this critical aspect of emergent intubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46536,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"130-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_232_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Various studies have delved into its incidence and risk factors, but a comprehensive meta-analysis exploring this life-threatening complication during emergent endotracheal intubation has been lacking. This study quantitatively assesses the global incidence and associated risk factors of peri-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA).

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to October 28, 2024. Two independent authors searched, reviewed, and evaluated selected studies. Any peer-reviewed published studies reporting the incidence of PICA among adults (≥18 years) outside of the operating theater were included. Studies reporting incidence within heterogeneous populations or from overlapping groups were excluded. The primary outcome focused on determining the global incidence of PICA, while the secondary outcome addressed associated risk factors. A random-effects model was used to aggregate overall incidence rates. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to examine PICA incidence in different locations and with the study's sample size. The publication bias was assessed via Egger's test and visualization of the funnel plot. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist.

Results: Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. PICA incidence varied from 0.5% to 23.3%. The estimated pooled incidence was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-3.6) across PICA in the emergency department (ED) (2.5%, 95% CI: 1.4-3.7) and outside of the ED (2.9%, 95% CI: 2.2-3.6). Egger's test yielded P = 0.009, indicating potential publication bias due to small-study effects, as suggested by the funnel plot. Meta-regression analysis revealed higher incidence in studies with smaller populations. Notably, preintubation hypotension, hypoxemia, and body mass index were found to be the most associated risk factors for PICA. Additionally, there was significant variability in PICA definitions, ranging from immediate to occurrences within 60 min after intubation.

Conclusion: PICA occurrences during emergent endotracheal intubation reached up to 3%, showing a similar rate both within and outside the ED. While limitations such as heterogeneity and potential bias exist, these findings underscore the imperative for prospective research. Prospective studies are warranted to further delineate this critical aspect of emergent intubation.

与插管期心脏骤停相关的发生率和易感因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:各种研究已经深入探讨了其发病率和危险因素,但缺乏一项全面的荟萃分析,探讨紧急气管插管期间这种危及生命的并发症。本研究定量评估了插管期心脏骤停(PICA)的全球发生率和相关危险因素。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library自成立至2024年10月28日的文献。两位独立作者检索、回顾和评价了选定的研究。所有同行评审的已发表的报告异食癖在手术室外成人(≥18岁)发病率的研究均被纳入。在异质人群或重叠人群中报道发病率的研究被排除。主要结果集中于确定异食癖的全球发病率,而次要结果则关注相关的危险因素。随机效应模型用于汇总总发病率。进行亚组分析和meta回归,以检查不同地区和研究样本量的异食癖发病率。通过Egger检验和可视化漏斗图评估发表偏倚。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估清单评估偏倚风险。结果:15篇文章符合meta分析的纳入标准。异食癖的发病率从0.5%到23.3%不等。在急诊科(ED) (2.5%, 95% CI: 1.4-3.7)和急诊室外(2.9%,95% CI: 2.2-3.6)的PICA合并发生率估计为2.7% (95% CI: 1.9-3.6)。Egger检验的结果为P = 0.009,如漏斗图所示,表明由于小研究效应存在潜在的发表偏倚。荟萃回归分析显示,在人群较少的研究中发病率较高。值得注意的是,插管前低血压、低氧血症和体重指数被发现是异食癖最相关的危险因素。此外,异食癖的定义也有很大的差异,从立即发生到插管后60分钟内发生。结论:紧急气管插管期间异食异食的发生率高达3%,在急诊科内外的发生率相似。尽管存在异质性和潜在偏倚等局限性,但这些发现强调了前瞻性研究的必要性。前瞻性研究有必要进一步描述紧急插管的这一关键方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine (Turk J Emerg Med) is an International, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes clinical and experimental trials, case reports, invited reviews, case images, letters to the Editor, and interesting research conducted in all fields of Emergency Medicine. The Journal is the official scientific publication of the Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) and is printed four times a year, in January, April, July and October. The language of the journal is English. The Journal is based on independent and unbiased double-blinded peer-reviewed principles. Only unpublished papers that are not under review for publication elsewhere can be submitted. The authors are responsible for the scientific content of the material to be published. The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine reserves the right to request any research materials on which the paper is based. The Editorial Board of the Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine and the Publisher adheres to the principles of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors, the World Association of Medical Editors, the Council of Science Editors, the Committee on Publication Ethics, the US National Library of Medicine, the US Office of Research Integrity, the European Association of Science Editors, and the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信