A core curriculum of point-of-care ultrasound examinations for frontline physicians in primary care: results from a European Delphi study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Camilla Aakjær Andersen, Thomas Løkkegaard, Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Hazel Edwards, Mihai Sorin Iacob, Kristina Lebedevaite, Mateusz Kosiak, Elena Codruta Gheorghe, Adib Salim, Viktor Rüttermann, Caroline Ewertsen, Christian Jenssen
{"title":"A core curriculum of point-of-care ultrasound examinations for frontline physicians in primary care: results from a European Delphi study.","authors":"Camilla Aakjær Andersen, Thomas Løkkegaard, Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Hazel Edwards, Mihai Sorin Iacob, Kristina Lebedevaite, Mateusz Kosiak, Elena Codruta Gheorghe, Adib Salim, Viktor Rüttermann, Caroline Ewertsen, Christian Jenssen","doi":"10.1055/a-2590-5242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has found its way into primary care in some, but not all, European countries. A prerequisite for achieving Europe-wide comparable diagnostic reliability of PoCUS performed by primary care physicians is high-quality training that is limited to relevant, frequently encountered PoCUS applications that are easy to learn and master. A European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine (EFSUMB) task force performed a brainstorming exercise to identify all possible ultrasound examinations that could be performed in primary care. A 3-stage Delphi process was launched. The Delphi panelists were 95 primary care physicians from 28 European countries with more than 2 years of experience using and teaching ultrasound. Solely focusing on the complexity of performing PoCUS, the panelists reduced the brainstorming list in a stepwise manner to a basic core curriculum intended for primary care frontline physicians including 40 diagnostic PoCUS examinations within 13 different anatomical areas and no ultrasound-guided procedures. A 75% cut-off was used for agreement. Despite the great heterogeneity of the Delphi panel representing different views and contexts from across Europe, kappa statistics showed substantial or moderate agreement across Delphi rounds 2 and 3 for 85% of the 40 diagnostic PoCUS applications. The results of this study offer guidance for EFSUMB to establish training recommendations for a basic core curriculum that can be adapted to the needs of different regions of Europe and thus create a basis for PoCUS to become a reliable diagnostic tool in primary care across Europe, based on common quality standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2590-5242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has found its way into primary care in some, but not all, European countries. A prerequisite for achieving Europe-wide comparable diagnostic reliability of PoCUS performed by primary care physicians is high-quality training that is limited to relevant, frequently encountered PoCUS applications that are easy to learn and master. A European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine (EFSUMB) task force performed a brainstorming exercise to identify all possible ultrasound examinations that could be performed in primary care. A 3-stage Delphi process was launched. The Delphi panelists were 95 primary care physicians from 28 European countries with more than 2 years of experience using and teaching ultrasound. Solely focusing on the complexity of performing PoCUS, the panelists reduced the brainstorming list in a stepwise manner to a basic core curriculum intended for primary care frontline physicians including 40 diagnostic PoCUS examinations within 13 different anatomical areas and no ultrasound-guided procedures. A 75% cut-off was used for agreement. Despite the great heterogeneity of the Delphi panel representing different views and contexts from across Europe, kappa statistics showed substantial or moderate agreement across Delphi rounds 2 and 3 for 85% of the 40 diagnostic PoCUS applications. The results of this study offer guidance for EFSUMB to establish training recommendations for a basic core curriculum that can be adapted to the needs of different regions of Europe and thus create a basis for PoCUS to become a reliable diagnostic tool in primary care across Europe, based on common quality standards.

初级保健一线医生的护理点超声检查的核心课程:来自欧洲德尔菲研究的结果。
即时超声(PoCUS)已经在一些(但不是全部)欧洲国家进入了初级保健。初级保健医生对PoCUS进行可靠的、欧洲范围内可比较的诊断可靠性的先决条件是高质量的培训,仅限于相关的、经常遇到的、易于学习和掌握的PoCUS应用。欧洲医学超声学会联合会(EFSUMB)工作组开始进行头脑风暴,以确定所有可能在初级保健中进行的超声检查。启动了三个阶段的德尔菲程序。德尔菲小组成员是来自28个欧洲国家的95名初级保健医生,他们有两年以上的超声使用和教学经验。小组成员专注于执行PoCUS的复杂性,逐步将头脑风暴列表减少到初级保健一线医生的基本核心课程,包括13个不同解剖区域的40个诊断PoCUS检查,并且没有超声引导的程序。75%的分界点用于一致性。尽管德尔福小组代表了来自欧洲各地的不同观点和背景,但kappa统计数据显示,在德尔福第二轮和第三轮中,40例诊断性PoCUS应用中有85%的应用具有实质性或适度的一致性。这项研究的结果为EFSUMB提供了指导,以制定基本核心课程的培训建议,这些建议可以适应欧洲不同地区的需要,从而为PoCUS根据共同质量标准成为全欧洲初级保健中可靠的诊断服务奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信