{"title":"University Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Cervical Spine Health.","authors":"Yanxiao Liu, Hua Wang, Huafei Liu, Lei Li","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S509806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prolonged sedentary behavior and electronic device use jeopardize university students' cervical spine health. This study investigated their knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) concerning cervical spine health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 25 to June 16, 2023, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among students at various Chinese universities. Demographic data and KAP scores were collected using self-developed questionnaires. Using 60% and 80% as cut-off values, KAP levels were categorized into three tiers: knowledge (inadequate: 0-7, moderate: 8-11, good: 12-15), attitudes (negative: 8-23, neutral: 24-31, positive: 32-39), and practices (inappropriate: 7-20, moderate: 21-28, proactive: 29-35).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,956 valid questionnaires, their mean age was 19.88 ± 1.40 years, with 71.8% of female gender. Notably, 75.9% reported daily electronic device use ≥4 hours. Regarding initial device acquisition, 37.1% obtained devices in middle school, 30.6% in high school, 22.5% in elementary school, and 9.9% in college. Mean knowledge, attitudes, and practices scores were 10.4 ± 2.1, 34.1 ± 3.9, and 20.9 ± 4.1. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that female students (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.10-1.75), non-freshmen (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.42-2.13), and acquiring knowledge through WeChat (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.47-2.36) or community hospitals (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.29-1.99) had higher probability of adequate knowledge. Non-medical majors (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.39-0.58) and using electronic devices for 3-4 hours (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45-0.99) or ≥4 hours daily (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.89) were negatively associated with attitudes. Positive attitudes (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22-1.31) and obtaining knowledge from medical experts (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.03-1.63) were associated with better practices, while female students (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.44-0.72) and frequent cervical discomfort (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.53) were the opposite.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>University students exhibited moderate knowledge, positive attitudes, and inappropriate practices regarding cervical spine health. Educational interventions are recommended, particularly for non-medical majors, individuals with prolonged digital device use, and freshmen.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"2375-2386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12050222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S509806","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Prolonged sedentary behavior and electronic device use jeopardize university students' cervical spine health. This study investigated their knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) concerning cervical spine health.
Methods: From May 25 to June 16, 2023, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among students at various Chinese universities. Demographic data and KAP scores were collected using self-developed questionnaires. Using 60% and 80% as cut-off values, KAP levels were categorized into three tiers: knowledge (inadequate: 0-7, moderate: 8-11, good: 12-15), attitudes (negative: 8-23, neutral: 24-31, positive: 32-39), and practices (inappropriate: 7-20, moderate: 21-28, proactive: 29-35).
Results: Of 1,956 valid questionnaires, their mean age was 19.88 ± 1.40 years, with 71.8% of female gender. Notably, 75.9% reported daily electronic device use ≥4 hours. Regarding initial device acquisition, 37.1% obtained devices in middle school, 30.6% in high school, 22.5% in elementary school, and 9.9% in college. Mean knowledge, attitudes, and practices scores were 10.4 ± 2.1, 34.1 ± 3.9, and 20.9 ± 4.1. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that female students (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.10-1.75), non-freshmen (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.42-2.13), and acquiring knowledge through WeChat (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.47-2.36) or community hospitals (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.29-1.99) had higher probability of adequate knowledge. Non-medical majors (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.39-0.58) and using electronic devices for 3-4 hours (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45-0.99) or ≥4 hours daily (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.89) were negatively associated with attitudes. Positive attitudes (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22-1.31) and obtaining knowledge from medical experts (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.03-1.63) were associated with better practices, while female students (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.44-0.72) and frequent cervical discomfort (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.53) were the opposite.
Conclusion: University students exhibited moderate knowledge, positive attitudes, and inappropriate practices regarding cervical spine health. Educational interventions are recommended, particularly for non-medical majors, individuals with prolonged digital device use, and freshmen.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.