Paul Galvez, Emmanuel d'Incau, Jacques Taillard, Vincent P Martin, Maria Clotilde Carra, Mathilde Fenelon, Virginie Chuy, Julien Coelho, Pierre Philip, Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi
{"title":"Efficacy of advancement treatments of the stomatognathic system on objective sleepiness in OSA: a systematic review.","authors":"Paul Galvez, Emmanuel d'Incau, Jacques Taillard, Vincent P Martin, Maria Clotilde Carra, Mathilde Fenelon, Virginie Chuy, Julien Coelho, Pierre Philip, Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Objective sleepiness is an important outcome requiring rigorous evaluation regarding OSA treatment efficacy, but no systematic review has explored the efficacy of advancement treatments of the stomatognathic system (ATSS), i.e. mandibular advancement device (MAD), hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS), and maxillomandibular advancement surgery (MMA), on objective sleepiness in OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. All clinical studies assessing the efficacy of ATSS on objective sleepiness in adults with OSA, by the maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT), the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), the Oxford sleep resistance test (OSLER), the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) or the sustained attention to response task (SART), were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 42 screened studies, 11 were included - 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 prospective studies. Regarding the RCTs, all assessed MAD efficacy and only one RCT found a significant improvement of objective sleepiness for MAD compared with placebo, on the MSLT. In the remaining RCTs, the included participants did not present objective sleepiness at baseline and were mostly with mild/moderate OSA. Regarding the prospective studies, all found a significant improvement of objective sleepiness for each treatment assessed, i.e. MAD, HNS, MMA and submental stimulation. Interestingly, the included participants presented objective sleepiness at baseline and moderate/severe OSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review highlighted the lack of RCTs assessing the efficacy of MAD or other ATSS on objective sleepiness in OSA. Further RCTs are needed to address this important outcome taking into account baseline objective sleepiness and OSA severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objectives: Objective sleepiness is an important outcome requiring rigorous evaluation regarding OSA treatment efficacy, but no systematic review has explored the efficacy of advancement treatments of the stomatognathic system (ATSS), i.e. mandibular advancement device (MAD), hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS), and maxillomandibular advancement surgery (MMA), on objective sleepiness in OSA.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. All clinical studies assessing the efficacy of ATSS on objective sleepiness in adults with OSA, by the maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT), the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), the Oxford sleep resistance test (OSLER), the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) or the sustained attention to response task (SART), were included.
Results: Among 42 screened studies, 11 were included - 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 prospective studies. Regarding the RCTs, all assessed MAD efficacy and only one RCT found a significant improvement of objective sleepiness for MAD compared with placebo, on the MSLT. In the remaining RCTs, the included participants did not present objective sleepiness at baseline and were mostly with mild/moderate OSA. Regarding the prospective studies, all found a significant improvement of objective sleepiness for each treatment assessed, i.e. MAD, HNS, MMA and submental stimulation. Interestingly, the included participants presented objective sleepiness at baseline and moderate/severe OSA.
Conclusions: This systematic review highlighted the lack of RCTs assessing the efficacy of MAD or other ATSS on objective sleepiness in OSA. Further RCTs are needed to address this important outcome taking into account baseline objective sleepiness and OSA severity.
研究目的:客观嗜睡是OSA治疗疗效需要严格评估的重要结果,但目前尚没有系统的文献综述探讨口腔颌突系统(ATSS)的推进治疗,即下颌推进装置(MAD)、舌下神经刺激(HNS)和上颌下颌推进手术(MMA)对OSA患者客观嗜睡的疗效。方法:使用PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库对相关文献进行系统综述。通过保持清醒测试(MWT)、多次睡眠潜伏期测试(MSLT)、牛津睡眠抵抗测试(OSLER)、精神运动警觉性任务(PVT)或持续注意反应任务(SART)评估ATSS对OSA成人客观嗜睡疗效的所有临床研究均被纳入。结果:在筛选的42项研究中,纳入11项——6项随机对照试验(rct)和5项前瞻性研究。关于随机对照试验,所有的随机对照试验都评估了MAD的疗效,只有一项随机对照试验发现,在MSLT上,与安慰剂相比,MAD的客观嗜睡有显著改善。在其余的随机对照试验中,纳入的参与者在基线时没有客观嗜睡,并且大多数患有轻度/中度OSA。关于前瞻性研究,所有研究都发现,每一种评估治疗,即MAD、HNS、MMA和潜意识刺激,都能显著改善客观嗜睡。有趣的是,纳入的参与者在基线和中度/重度OSA时表现出客观嗜睡。结论:本系统综述强调缺乏评估MAD或其他ATSS对OSA患者客观嗜睡效果的随机对照试验。考虑到基线客观嗜睡和OSA严重程度,需要进一步的随机对照试验来解决这一重要结果。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.