Three-Muscle Surgery for Large- and Medium-Angle Intermittent Exotropia.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yuval Cohen, Leah Attal, Aviv Vidan, Yehuda Greenberger, Yair Morad, Otzem Chassid
{"title":"Three-Muscle Surgery for Large- and Medium-Angle Intermittent Exotropia.","authors":"Yuval Cohen, Leah Attal, Aviv Vidan, Yehuda Greenberger, Yair Morad, Otzem Chassid","doi":"10.3928/01913913-20250312-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the success rate and the dose-response ratio of three-muscle compared to two-muscle surgery for the treatment of medium- and large-angle (20 to 45 prism diopters [PD]) intermittent exotropia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of patients who underwent strabismus surgery for treatment of intermittent exotropia were reviewed. Patients with exodeviation of 20 to 45 PD who underwent either bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc; two-muscle group) or BLR recession and unilateral medial rectus resection (BLRc+UMR; three-muscle group) were selected. Preoperative and postoperative deviation and amount of recessed and resected muscles were assessed. Successful surgery was defined as postoperative deviation of 10 PD or less of orthophoria at the last visit. Dose-response ratio was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four patients were included. The mean age of patients at surgery was 11.85 ± 10.82 years (range: 4 to 54 years) and was comparable in both groups. The mean far preoperative deviation was lower for the two-muscle than the three-muscle group, and measured 29.7 ± 5.9 and 34.4 ± 7.1 PD, respectively (<i>P</i> = .019). At the last follow-up, successful motor outcomes for both distance and near were achieved in 70.5% and 84.6% in the two-muscle and three-muscle group, respectively. At the last follow-up, mean dose-response ratio was significantly higher for the three-muscle group (1.82 ± 0.58 and 2.72 ± 0.72 PD/mm for the two-muscle and three-muscle group, respectively; <i>P</i> < .0001). Overcorrections were similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary repair surgery of intermittent exotropia with three-muscle surgery is an effective method of resolving 20 to 45 PD with excellent outcomes and a low risk of overcorrection. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 20XX;XX(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20250312-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the success rate and the dose-response ratio of three-muscle compared to two-muscle surgery for the treatment of medium- and large-angle (20 to 45 prism diopters [PD]) intermittent exotropia.

Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent strabismus surgery for treatment of intermittent exotropia were reviewed. Patients with exodeviation of 20 to 45 PD who underwent either bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc; two-muscle group) or BLR recession and unilateral medial rectus resection (BLRc+UMR; three-muscle group) were selected. Preoperative and postoperative deviation and amount of recessed and resected muscles were assessed. Successful surgery was defined as postoperative deviation of 10 PD or less of orthophoria at the last visit. Dose-response ratio was analyzed.

Results: Forty-four patients were included. The mean age of patients at surgery was 11.85 ± 10.82 years (range: 4 to 54 years) and was comparable in both groups. The mean far preoperative deviation was lower for the two-muscle than the three-muscle group, and measured 29.7 ± 5.9 and 34.4 ± 7.1 PD, respectively (P = .019). At the last follow-up, successful motor outcomes for both distance and near were achieved in 70.5% and 84.6% in the two-muscle and three-muscle group, respectively. At the last follow-up, mean dose-response ratio was significantly higher for the three-muscle group (1.82 ± 0.58 and 2.72 ± 0.72 PD/mm for the two-muscle and three-muscle group, respectively; P < .0001). Overcorrections were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Primary repair surgery of intermittent exotropia with three-muscle surgery is an effective method of resolving 20 to 45 PD with excellent outcomes and a low risk of overcorrection. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;XX(X):XXX-XXX.].

三肌手术治疗大、中角度间歇性外斜视。
目的:比较三肌手术与两肌手术治疗中、大角度(20 ~ 45棱镜屈光度[PD])间歇性外斜视的成功率和剂量反应比。方法:回顾性分析斜视手术治疗间歇性外斜视患者的临床资料。20 - 45 PD外偏的患者接受双侧直肌衰退(BLRc;双肌群)或BLR衰退和单侧内侧直肌切除术(BLRc+UMR;选取三个肌群。评估术前和术后的偏移量以及凹陷和切除肌肉的数量。手术成功定义为最后一次访视时正角偏差小于等于10pd。分析剂量-反应比。结果:纳入44例患者。手术患者的平均年龄为11.85±10.82岁(范围:4至54岁),两组患者的平均年龄具有可比性。2块肌组的平均术前远偏差低于3块肌组,分别为29.7±5.9和34.4±7.1 PD (P = 0.019)。在最后一次随访中,两肌组和三肌组的长距离和近距离运动成功率分别为70.5%和84.6%。末次随访时,三肌组的平均剂量反应比显著高于两肌组(1.82±0.58)和三肌组(2.72±0.72)PD/mm;P < 0.0001)。两组矫正过度的情况相似。结论:间歇性外斜视联合三肌手术一期修复术是治疗20 ~ 45 PD的有效方法,疗效好,过矫风险低。[J].儿童眼斜视,2009;XX(X):XXX-XXX。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication for pediatric ophthalmologists. The Journal has published original articles on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of eye disorders in the pediatric age group and the treatment of strabismus in all age groups for over 50 years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信