Workload reduction of digital breast tomosynthesis screening using artificial intelligence and synthetic mammography: a simulation study.

IF 1.9 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22005
Victor Dahlblom, Magnus Dustler, Sophia Zackrisson, Anders Tingberg
{"title":"Workload reduction of digital breast tomosynthesis screening using artificial intelligence and synthetic mammography: a simulation study.","authors":"Victor Dahlblom, Magnus Dustler, Sophia Zackrisson, Anders Tingberg","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To achieve the high sensitivity of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), a time-consuming reading is necessary. However, synthetic mammography (SM) images, equivalent to digital mammography (DM), can be generated from DBT images. SM is faster to read and might be sufficient in many cases. We investigate using artificial intelligence (AI) to stratify examinations into reading of either SM or DBT to minimize workload and maximize accuracy.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>This is a retrospective study based on double-read paired DM and one-view DBT from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. DBT examinations were analyzed with the cancer detection AI system ScreenPoint Transpara 1.7. For low-risk examinations, SM reading was simulated by assuming equality with DM reading. For high-risk examinations, the DBT reading results were used. Different combinations of single and double reading were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By double-reading the DBT of 30% (4452/14,772) of the cases with the highest risk, and single-reading SM for the rest, 122 cancers would be detected with the same reading workload as DM double reading. That is 28% (27/95) more cancers would be detected than with DM double reading, and in total, 96% (122/127) of the cancers detectable with full DBT double reading would be found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a DBT-based screening program, AI could be used to select high-risk cases where the reading of DBT is valuable, whereas SM is sufficient for low-risk cases. Substantially, more cancers could be detected compared with DM only, with only a limited increase in reading workload. Prospective studies are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"12 Suppl 2","pages":"S22005"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To achieve the high sensitivity of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), a time-consuming reading is necessary. However, synthetic mammography (SM) images, equivalent to digital mammography (DM), can be generated from DBT images. SM is faster to read and might be sufficient in many cases. We investigate using artificial intelligence (AI) to stratify examinations into reading of either SM or DBT to minimize workload and maximize accuracy.

Approach: This is a retrospective study based on double-read paired DM and one-view DBT from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. DBT examinations were analyzed with the cancer detection AI system ScreenPoint Transpara 1.7. For low-risk examinations, SM reading was simulated by assuming equality with DM reading. For high-risk examinations, the DBT reading results were used. Different combinations of single and double reading were studied.

Results: By double-reading the DBT of 30% (4452/14,772) of the cases with the highest risk, and single-reading SM for the rest, 122 cancers would be detected with the same reading workload as DM double reading. That is 28% (27/95) more cancers would be detected than with DM double reading, and in total, 96% (122/127) of the cancers detectable with full DBT double reading would be found.

Conclusions: In a DBT-based screening program, AI could be used to select high-risk cases where the reading of DBT is valuable, whereas SM is sufficient for low-risk cases. Substantially, more cancers could be detected compared with DM only, with only a limited increase in reading workload. Prospective studies are necessary.

使用人工智能和合成乳房x线照相术减少数字乳房断层合成筛查的工作量:一项模拟研究。
目的:为了实现数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)的高灵敏度,需要进行耗时的读取。然而,合成乳房x线摄影(SM)图像,相当于数字乳房x线摄影(DM),可以从DBT图像生成。SM的阅读速度更快,在许多情况下可能就足够了。我们研究使用人工智能(AI)将考试分为SM阅读或DBT阅读,以最大限度地减少工作量和提高准确性。方法:这是一项基于Malmö乳腺断层合成筛查试验的双读配对DM和单视图DBT的回顾性研究。采用癌症检测AI系统ScreenPoint Transpara 1.7对DBT检查进行分析。对于低风险检查,SM读数通过假设与DM读数相等来模拟。对于高危检查,采用DBT读数结果。研究了单读和双读的不同组合。结果:通过双读30%(4452/ 14772)高危患者的DBT,单读SM,在与DM双读工作量相同的情况下检出122例肿瘤。也就是说,与DM双读数相比,多28%(27/95)的癌症被检测到,而DBT全双读数检测到的癌症中,有96%(122/127)被发现。结论:在基于DBT的筛查项目中,人工智能可用于选择DBT读数有价值的高风险病例,而SM用于低风险病例就足够了。实际上,与DM相比,可以检测到更多的癌症,而阅读工作量仅增加有限。前瞻性研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging
Journal of Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信