HRS/ACC Scientific Statement: Guiding Principles on Same-Day Discharge for Intracardiac Catheter Ablation Procedures.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Amit J Shanker, Samuel O Jones, James C Blankenship, Jim W Cheung, Ijeoma A Ekeruo, Jodie L Hurwitz, Christopher F Liu, Faisal M Merchant, Wilber W Su, Paul D Varosy
{"title":"HRS/ACC Scientific Statement: Guiding Principles on Same-Day Discharge for Intracardiac Catheter Ablation Procedures.","authors":"Amit J Shanker, Samuel O Jones, James C Blankenship, Jim W Cheung, Ijeoma A Ekeruo, Jodie L Hurwitz, Christopher F Liu, Faisal M Merchant, Wilber W Su, Paul D Varosy","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2025.03.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous catheter ablation in interventional cardiac electrophysiology has evolved over the past several decades. Technologic advances and evolving procedural strategies have improved procedural efficiencies, increased success rates, and lowered complication rates. These advances have increased the ability to treat more patients successfully; however, limitations to access have grown. Access challenges (exacerbated during the COVID-19 public health emergency) and economic pressures have driven a shift in practice trends to reduce hospitalization duration and optimize resource utilization. A same-day discharge (SDD) strategy has increasingly been used to address these challenges. Incorporating a SDD strategy has recently been supported by global clinical studies (demonstrating proof of concept) and real-world evidence/United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims data (characterizing a low incidence of complications and need for readmission/emergency department visits). This document analyzes available global clinical data and real-world evidence examining the impact of a cardiac ablation SDD strategy on patient safety, patient access, operational efficiencies, and health care expenditures. Recommended best practices will also be characterized built on the foundation of a shared decision-making strategy that optimizes patient safety, comfort, and procedural outcomes. As clinical flow paradigms evolve with alternate sites of care (ie, ambulatory surgery centers), real-world registries to track outcomes should inform future decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2025.03.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Percutaneous catheter ablation in interventional cardiac electrophysiology has evolved over the past several decades. Technologic advances and evolving procedural strategies have improved procedural efficiencies, increased success rates, and lowered complication rates. These advances have increased the ability to treat more patients successfully; however, limitations to access have grown. Access challenges (exacerbated during the COVID-19 public health emergency) and economic pressures have driven a shift in practice trends to reduce hospitalization duration and optimize resource utilization. A same-day discharge (SDD) strategy has increasingly been used to address these challenges. Incorporating a SDD strategy has recently been supported by global clinical studies (demonstrating proof of concept) and real-world evidence/United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims data (characterizing a low incidence of complications and need for readmission/emergency department visits). This document analyzes available global clinical data and real-world evidence examining the impact of a cardiac ablation SDD strategy on patient safety, patient access, operational efficiencies, and health care expenditures. Recommended best practices will also be characterized built on the foundation of a shared decision-making strategy that optimizes patient safety, comfort, and procedural outcomes. As clinical flow paradigms evolve with alternate sites of care (ie, ambulatory surgery centers), real-world registries to track outcomes should inform future decision-making.

HRS/ACC科学声明:心内导管消融术当日出院指导原则。
经皮导管消融介入心脏电生理在过去的几十年里不断发展。技术进步和不断发展的手术策略提高了手术效率,提高了成功率,降低了并发症发生率。这些进步提高了成功治疗更多患者的能力;然而,访问的限制越来越大。获取挑战(在COVID-19突发公共卫生事件期间加剧)和经济压力推动了实践趋势的转变,以减少住院时间和优化资源利用。为了应对这些挑战,越来越多地采用了当日排放(SDD)战略。最近,全球临床研究(展示概念证明)和实际证据/美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心索赔数据(特点是并发症发生率低,需要再入院/急诊室就诊)支持纳入SDD战略。本文分析了现有的全球临床数据和真实世界的证据,研究了心脏消融SDD策略对患者安全、患者可及性、运营效率和医疗保健支出的影响。推荐的最佳做法也将建立在共同决策策略的基础上,以优化患者的安全性、舒适性和手术结果。随着临床流程范例随着护理地点(如门诊手术中心)的变化而发展,追踪结果的真实世界登记应该为未来的决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信