Factors influencing patients to choose one obesity treatment over another: a qualitative study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
H C Craig, D Alsaeed, E Al Ozairi, S Norris, J Holian, C Kennedy, H Heneghan, D McGillicuddy, E Farrell, E Hollmann, W Al-Najim, C W le Roux
{"title":"Factors influencing patients to choose one obesity treatment over another: a qualitative study.","authors":"H C Craig, D Alsaeed, E Al Ozairi, S Norris, J Holian, C Kennedy, H Heneghan, D McGillicuddy, E Farrell, E Hollmann, W Al-Najim, C W le Roux","doi":"10.1038/s41366-025-01789-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When deciding a treatment option for the disease of obesity, knowing what the patient's preferences are and what factors have influenced them can support healthcare professionals (HCPs) in tailoring their management plan. Little is known about patient preferences for obesity treatment. The present study was designed to identify factors that may influence these preferences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify factors affecting patient preferences and subsequent obesity treatment preferences among those seeking treatment for obesity-related disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a participatory action research design, we conducted World Café focus groups as part of a triangulation process with previously collected individual interviews and photovoice. Using purposive sampling, 12 patients with obesity complications of chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease took part. Thematic analysis was conducted to review themes, determine their significance, and report the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes emerged from the World Café on what influences patient treatment choice, which were 1) lack of resources, 2) healthcare professionals' knowledge gaps, 3) lack of understanding, 4) emotional impact, and 5) support from family, friends, and HCPs. This data was then reviewed with the findings from the previous methodologies of one-to-one interviews and photovoice. Overall, four main themes were identified, which were 1) structural factors, 2) physical and emotional impact, 3) knowledge (of healthcare professionals and patients), and 4) support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the importance of ensuring access to all treatment options by developing effective treatment plans with clear information for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-01789-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When deciding a treatment option for the disease of obesity, knowing what the patient's preferences are and what factors have influenced them can support healthcare professionals (HCPs) in tailoring their management plan. Little is known about patient preferences for obesity treatment. The present study was designed to identify factors that may influence these preferences.

Objective: We aimed to identify factors affecting patient preferences and subsequent obesity treatment preferences among those seeking treatment for obesity-related disorders.

Methods: Using a participatory action research design, we conducted World Café focus groups as part of a triangulation process with previously collected individual interviews and photovoice. Using purposive sampling, 12 patients with obesity complications of chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease took part. Thematic analysis was conducted to review themes, determine their significance, and report the findings.

Results: Five themes emerged from the World Café on what influences patient treatment choice, which were 1) lack of resources, 2) healthcare professionals' knowledge gaps, 3) lack of understanding, 4) emotional impact, and 5) support from family, friends, and HCPs. This data was then reviewed with the findings from the previous methodologies of one-to-one interviews and photovoice. Overall, four main themes were identified, which were 1) structural factors, 2) physical and emotional impact, 3) knowledge (of healthcare professionals and patients), and 4) support.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the importance of ensuring access to all treatment options by developing effective treatment plans with clear information for patients.

影响患者选择一种肥胖治疗方法的因素:一项定性研究。
背景:在决定肥胖症的治疗方案时,了解患者的偏好是什么以及影响他们的因素可以帮助医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)定制他们的管理计划。患者对肥胖治疗的偏好知之甚少。本研究旨在确定可能影响这些偏好的因素。目的:我们旨在确定在寻求肥胖相关疾病治疗的患者中影响患者偏好和随后的肥胖治疗偏好的因素。方法:采用参与式行动研究设计,我们进行了世界咖啡馆焦点小组,作为三角测量过程的一部分,使用先前收集的个人访谈和照片语音。采用有目的的抽样,12例慢性肾脏疾病、2型糖尿病和代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病的肥胖并发症患者参与了研究。进行主题分析,以审查主题,确定其重要性,并报告调查结果。结果:世界咖啡调查中出现了影响患者治疗选择的五个主题,分别是:1)资源缺乏,2)卫生保健专业人员的知识差距,3)缺乏理解,4)情绪影响,以及5)来自家人、朋友和卫生保健专业人员的支持。然后将这些数据与先前的一对一访谈和照片语音方法的结果进行审查。总体而言,确定了四个主要主题,即1)结构因素,2)身体和情绪影响,3)知识(医疗保健专业人员和患者),以及4)支持。结论:本研究表明,通过制定有效的治疗计划,为患者提供明确的信息,确保获得所有治疗方案的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Obesity
International Journal of Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obesity is a multi-disciplinary forum for research describing basic, clinical and applied studies in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and nutrition, molecular, metabolic, psychological and epidemiological aspects of obesity and related disorders. We publish a range of content types including original research articles, technical reports, reviews, correspondence and brief communications that elaborate on significant advances in the field and cover topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信