Understanding the intersections between ethnicity, area-level deprivation, and inpatient-related features amongst patients with psychotic disorders: a mental health electronic records analysis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Charlotte Humphreys, Jo Hodgekins, Hitesh Shetty, Peter Schofield, Rob Stewart, Sherifat Oduola
{"title":"Understanding the intersections between ethnicity, area-level deprivation, and inpatient-related features amongst patients with psychotic disorders: a mental health electronic records analysis.","authors":"Charlotte Humphreys, Jo Hodgekins, Hitesh Shetty, Peter Schofield, Rob Stewart, Sherifat Oduola","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02908-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ethnic and area-level deprivation disparities in psychiatric inpatient outcomes amongst patients with psychotic disorders are known. However, how these two variables intersect to influence features of inpatient care is unclear. We investigated this intersection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using de-identified electronic health data from inpatient services at a large south London mental healthcare provider, we identified a sample of 6767 working-age patients with non-affective psychotic disorders who were admitted between 2016 and 2019. Logistic and negative binomial regressions were used to examine the relationships between ethnicity (and then deprivation) with inpatient-related features (compulsory admission, psychiatric intensive unit admission, length of stay and number of admissions), adjusting for confounders. The sample was stratified by area-level deprivation to understand the intersection of ethnicity, deprivation and these inpatient-related features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients from all areas except the least deprived were at greater risk of compulsory admission, admission to psychiatric intensive care units and more frequent admissions compared with patients from the least deprived areas. All minoritised ethnic patients were more likely to be compulsorily admitted compared with White British patients. Living in the least deprived areas appeared to offer protection against compulsory admission for some ethnic minority groups, but not Black British or Asian patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed how psychiatric inpatient-related features for patients with non-affective psychotic disorders were explained not only by the separate effects of area-level deprivation and ethnicity but also by the unique intersections of these two factors. Our findings have implications for policy and interventions aimed at reducing the drivers of inpatient admissions by addressing social stressors in deprived areas and among ethnic minority patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02908-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ethnic and area-level deprivation disparities in psychiatric inpatient outcomes amongst patients with psychotic disorders are known. However, how these two variables intersect to influence features of inpatient care is unclear. We investigated this intersection.

Methods: Using de-identified electronic health data from inpatient services at a large south London mental healthcare provider, we identified a sample of 6767 working-age patients with non-affective psychotic disorders who were admitted between 2016 and 2019. Logistic and negative binomial regressions were used to examine the relationships between ethnicity (and then deprivation) with inpatient-related features (compulsory admission, psychiatric intensive unit admission, length of stay and number of admissions), adjusting for confounders. The sample was stratified by area-level deprivation to understand the intersection of ethnicity, deprivation and these inpatient-related features.

Results: Patients from all areas except the least deprived were at greater risk of compulsory admission, admission to psychiatric intensive care units and more frequent admissions compared with patients from the least deprived areas. All minoritised ethnic patients were more likely to be compulsorily admitted compared with White British patients. Living in the least deprived areas appeared to offer protection against compulsory admission for some ethnic minority groups, but not Black British or Asian patients.

Conclusions: This study showed how psychiatric inpatient-related features for patients with non-affective psychotic disorders were explained not only by the separate effects of area-level deprivation and ethnicity but also by the unique intersections of these two factors. Our findings have implications for policy and interventions aimed at reducing the drivers of inpatient admissions by addressing social stressors in deprived areas and among ethnic minority patients.

了解种族、地区剥夺和精神病患者住院相关特征之间的交集:一项精神健康电子记录分析
目的:了解精神障碍患者住院治疗结果的种族和地区剥夺差异。然而,这两个变量如何交叉影响住院治疗的特征尚不清楚。我们调查了这个十字路口。方法:使用来自伦敦南部一家大型精神卫生保健提供者住院服务的去识别电子健康数据,我们确定了2016年至2019年期间入院的6767名患有非情感性精神障碍的工作年龄患者的样本。使用逻辑回归和负二项回归来检验种族(然后是剥夺)与住院相关特征(强制住院、精神科重症病房住院、住院时间和住院次数)之间的关系,并对混杂因素进行调整。样本按地区水平剥夺分层,以了解种族、剥夺和这些住院患者相关特征的交集。结果:与最贫困地区的患者相比,除最贫困地区外,其他地区的患者被强制入院、进入精神重症监护病房的风险更高,入院频率更高。与英国白人患者相比,所有少数族裔患者更有可能被强制入院。生活在最贫困地区似乎可以保护一些少数族裔不被强制入院,但英国黑人或亚洲患者却没有。结论:本研究表明,非情感性精神障碍患者的精神病住院相关特征不仅可以通过区域水平剥夺和种族的单独影响来解释,而且可以通过这两个因素的独特交叉来解释。我们的研究结果对旨在通过解决贫困地区和少数民族患者的社会压力因素来减少住院患者入院驱动因素的政策和干预措施具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信