Elisa Gatta, Virginia Maltese, Ilenia Pirola, Elena Gandossi, Irene Silvestrini, Massimiliano Ugoccioni, Riccardo Morandi, Claudio Casella, Carlo Cappelli
{"title":"Are liquid levothyroxine formulations comparable? The LETI study.","authors":"Elisa Gatta, Virginia Maltese, Ilenia Pirola, Elena Gandossi, Irene Silvestrini, Massimiliano Ugoccioni, Riccardo Morandi, Claudio Casella, Carlo Cappelli","doi":"10.1186/s13044-025-00236-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liquid ethanol-containing levothyroxine (e-LT4) is known to circumvent malabsorption induced by food, drugs, or pathological conditions. Recently a new ethanol-free formulation of liquid levothyroxine (ef-LT4) has been commercialized. No studies have compared e-LT4 with ef-LT4. The aim of the present study is to compare thyroid hormone profile in patients treated with e-LT4 and ef-LT4.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively retrieved thyroid hormonal profile and clinical data of 48 patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism who had been on stable treatment with an e- LT4 formulation at the same dosage for at least one year and who decided to switch to ef-LT4 for tasting issue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant increase in TSH levels was observed after 6 months on ef-LT4 treatment (2.5 ± 0.8 mIU/ml vs. 3.1 ± 1.0 mIU/ml, respectively, p < .001), while fT4 decreased [1.2 ng/dl (IQR 1.1-1.4) vs. 1.1 ng/dl (1.0-1.2), respectively, p = .047], maintaining the same dosage of LT4. In 31 patients, for whom data were available 12 months after the switch, TSH further increased (2.50 ± 0.9 mIU/ml at baseline vs 3.2 ± 0.9 mIU/ml after 6 months vs 3.5 ± 0.9 mIU/ml at 12 months, p < .001) and fT4 decreased [1.2 ng/dl (IQR 1.1-1.4) vs. 1.1 ng/dl (IQR 0.9-1.3) vs 1.0 ng/dl (IQR 0.9-1.1), p = .008].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ef-LT4 formulation seems to be less effective compared to e-LT4 over time. However, further prospective cross-sectional studies, performed in large sets of patients, even on concomitant therapy with interfering drugs, are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39048,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-025-00236-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Liquid ethanol-containing levothyroxine (e-LT4) is known to circumvent malabsorption induced by food, drugs, or pathological conditions. Recently a new ethanol-free formulation of liquid levothyroxine (ef-LT4) has been commercialized. No studies have compared e-LT4 with ef-LT4. The aim of the present study is to compare thyroid hormone profile in patients treated with e-LT4 and ef-LT4.
Material and methods: We retrospectively retrieved thyroid hormonal profile and clinical data of 48 patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism who had been on stable treatment with an e- LT4 formulation at the same dosage for at least one year and who decided to switch to ef-LT4 for tasting issue.
Results: A significant increase in TSH levels was observed after 6 months on ef-LT4 treatment (2.5 ± 0.8 mIU/ml vs. 3.1 ± 1.0 mIU/ml, respectively, p < .001), while fT4 decreased [1.2 ng/dl (IQR 1.1-1.4) vs. 1.1 ng/dl (1.0-1.2), respectively, p = .047], maintaining the same dosage of LT4. In 31 patients, for whom data were available 12 months after the switch, TSH further increased (2.50 ± 0.9 mIU/ml at baseline vs 3.2 ± 0.9 mIU/ml after 6 months vs 3.5 ± 0.9 mIU/ml at 12 months, p < .001) and fT4 decreased [1.2 ng/dl (IQR 1.1-1.4) vs. 1.1 ng/dl (IQR 0.9-1.3) vs 1.0 ng/dl (IQR 0.9-1.1), p = .008].
Conclusion: ef-LT4 formulation seems to be less effective compared to e-LT4 over time. However, further prospective cross-sectional studies, performed in large sets of patients, even on concomitant therapy with interfering drugs, are needed.