Comparative Study of Problem-Based Learning and Traditional Teaching Methods on Medical Students' Outcomes in Pediatrics Clerkships.

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S515527
Hongjun Ba, Lingling Xu, Yufen Gu, Yijuan Li, Xiaoyun Jiang, Xiaoyu Li, Shujuan Li
{"title":"Comparative Study of Problem-Based Learning and Traditional Teaching Methods on Medical Students' Outcomes in Pediatrics Clerkships.","authors":"Hongjun Ba, Lingling Xu, Yufen Gu, Yijuan Li, Xiaoyun Jiang, Xiaoyu Li, Shujuan Li","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S515527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is an engaging, student-centered teaching approach that has become increasingly popular in the field of medical education. Particularly during clinical rotations, PBL is thought to enhance students' clinical reasoning and skills. However, the impact of PBL in pediatric clerkships has not been fully explored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the influence of PBL on the clinical skills of medical interns during pediatric rotations, comparing the outcomes between PBL and traditional teaching methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 72 medical interns (38 male, 34 female) participating in pediatric rotations at our hospital between November 2023 and September 2024. The interns were assigned at random to either the PBL group (36 students) or the traditional teaching group (36 students), with stratification based on baseline clinical examination scores. Both groups participated in a two-week pediatric internship, encountering identical clinical cases. The PBL group received instruction supplemented with PBL, while the traditional group received bedside teaching. The outcomes were evaluated using a theoretical knowledge exam, Mini-CEX assessments, and a PBL group satisfaction survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the theoretical knowledge exam showed no significant difference between the groups (PBL group: 90.25 ± 2.15, traditional group: 89.78 ± 2.14, p > 0.05), indicating similar support for theoretical learning. Mini-CEX evaluations demonstrated that the PBL group showed significant improvements in history taking, medical decision-making, physician-patient interactions, and comprehensive clinical skills compared to the traditional group. Feedback from the PBL group was overwhelmingly positive, with students highlighting significant improvements in clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBL significantly enhanced clinical skills in pediatric clerkships, particularly in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and communication. Although both teaching methods supported theoretical learning equally, PBL fostered greater student engagement and deeper learning, suggesting that it could be a valuable model for future medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"615-624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S515527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is an engaging, student-centered teaching approach that has become increasingly popular in the field of medical education. Particularly during clinical rotations, PBL is thought to enhance students' clinical reasoning and skills. However, the impact of PBL in pediatric clerkships has not been fully explored.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the influence of PBL on the clinical skills of medical interns during pediatric rotations, comparing the outcomes between PBL and traditional teaching methods.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 72 medical interns (38 male, 34 female) participating in pediatric rotations at our hospital between November 2023 and September 2024. The interns were assigned at random to either the PBL group (36 students) or the traditional teaching group (36 students), with stratification based on baseline clinical examination scores. Both groups participated in a two-week pediatric internship, encountering identical clinical cases. The PBL group received instruction supplemented with PBL, while the traditional group received bedside teaching. The outcomes were evaluated using a theoretical knowledge exam, Mini-CEX assessments, and a PBL group satisfaction survey.

Results: The results of the theoretical knowledge exam showed no significant difference between the groups (PBL group: 90.25 ± 2.15, traditional group: 89.78 ± 2.14, p > 0.05), indicating similar support for theoretical learning. Mini-CEX evaluations demonstrated that the PBL group showed significant improvements in history taking, medical decision-making, physician-patient interactions, and comprehensive clinical skills compared to the traditional group. Feedback from the PBL group was overwhelmingly positive, with students highlighting significant improvements in clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills.

Conclusion: PBL significantly enhanced clinical skills in pediatric clerkships, particularly in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and communication. Although both teaching methods supported theoretical learning equally, PBL fostered greater student engagement and deeper learning, suggesting that it could be a valuable model for future medical education.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

问题型学习与传统教学方法对医学生儿科见习效果的比较研究。
背景:基于问题的学习(PBL)是一种引人入胜的、以学生为中心的教学方法,在医学教育领域越来越受欢迎。特别是在临床轮转期间,PBL被认为可以提高学生的临床推理和技能。然而,PBL对儿科办事员的影响尚未得到充分探讨。目的:本研究旨在评估PBL对儿科轮转实习医师临床技能的影响,并比较PBL与传统教学方法的效果。方法:对2023年11月至2024年9月在我院参加儿科轮转的72名医学实习生(男38名,女34名)进行随机对照试验。实习生被随机分配到PBL组(36名学生)或传统教学组(36名学生),并根据基线临床检查分数进行分层。两组都参加了为期两周的儿科实习,遇到了相同的临床病例。PBL组采用PBL辅助教学,传统组采用床边教学。通过理论知识考试、Mini-CEX评估和PBL小组满意度调查来评估结果。结果:理论知识考试成绩各组间差异无统计学意义(PBL组:90.25±2.15,传统组:89.78±2.14,p < 0.05),表明对理论学习的支持程度相似。Mini-CEX评估显示,与传统组相比,PBL组在病史记录、医疗决策、医患互动和综合临床技能方面有显著改善。PBL小组的反馈非常积极,学生们强调临床推理和诊断技能的显著提高。结论:PBL能显著提高儿科见习员的临床技能,尤其是临床推理、诊断和沟通能力。虽然两种教学方法都同样支持理论学习,但PBL培养了更多的学生参与和更深入的学习,这表明它可能是未来医学教育的一种有价值的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信