The effect of perioperative ketamine and esketamine administration on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kwon Hui Seo, Shu Chung Choi, Jueun Kwak, Na Jin Kim
{"title":"The effect of perioperative ketamine and esketamine administration on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kwon Hui Seo, Shu Chung Choi, Jueun Kwak, Na Jin Kim","doi":"10.4097/kja.24930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of perioperative ketamine and esketamine on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify their impact on PONV and related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing ketamine or esketamine with control agents. The primary outcome was a pooled analysis of PONV and nausea-only data. PONV, postoperative nausea (PON), and postoperative vomiting (POV) were also analyzed separately. Subgroup analyses were conducted by comparator type (placebo, opioid, or non-opioid) and dose categories. Meta-regression was used to assess dose-response relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five studies (n = 6,676) were included. Ketamine and esketamine did not significantly reduce the incidence of pooled PONV risk (risk ratio [RR]: 0.95, 95% CI [0.87, 1.04], P = 0.274). No benefit was found versus placebo. Compared with opioids, PONV was reduced (RR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.32, 0.77], P = 0.002), but not in the pooled analysis (RR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.43, 1.08], P = 0.107). Conversely, compared with non-opioid controls, ketamine/esketamine increased the pooled PONV risk (RR: 1.46, 95% CI [1.03, 2.05], P = 0.032). No significant dose-response relationship was found. Both agents increased hallucinations (RR: 1.73; 95% CI [1.35, 2.20], P = 0.0002) and drowsiness (RR: 2.18, 95% CI [1.13-4.21], P = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ketamine and esketamine did not significantly reduce PONV overall. While they showed benefits compared with opioid-based regimens, they may be less effective than non-opioid adjuvants. However, their neuropsychiatric and sedative risks warrant cautious use.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effects of perioperative ketamine and esketamine on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify their impact on PONV and related adverse events.

Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing ketamine or esketamine with control agents. The primary outcome was a pooled analysis of PONV and nausea-only data. PONV, postoperative nausea (PON), and postoperative vomiting (POV) were also analyzed separately. Subgroup analyses were conducted by comparator type (placebo, opioid, or non-opioid) and dose categories. Meta-regression was used to assess dose-response relationships.

Results: Fifty-five studies (n = 6,676) were included. Ketamine and esketamine did not significantly reduce the incidence of pooled PONV risk (risk ratio [RR]: 0.95, 95% CI [0.87, 1.04], P = 0.274). No benefit was found versus placebo. Compared with opioids, PONV was reduced (RR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.32, 0.77], P = 0.002), but not in the pooled analysis (RR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.43, 1.08], P = 0.107). Conversely, compared with non-opioid controls, ketamine/esketamine increased the pooled PONV risk (RR: 1.46, 95% CI [1.03, 2.05], P = 0.032). No significant dose-response relationship was found. Both agents increased hallucinations (RR: 1.73; 95% CI [1.35, 2.20], P = 0.0002) and drowsiness (RR: 2.18, 95% CI [1.13-4.21], P = 0.024).

Conclusions: Ketamine and esketamine did not significantly reduce PONV overall. While they showed benefits compared with opioid-based regimens, they may be less effective than non-opioid adjuvants. However, their neuropsychiatric and sedative risks warrant cautious use.

围手术期氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮对全身麻醉患者术后恶心呕吐的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:围手术期氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮对术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明它们对PONV和相关不良事件的影响。方法:我们对氯胺酮或艾氯胺酮与对照药物的随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究进行了荟萃分析。主要结局是PONV和恶心数据的汇总分析。PONV、术后恶心(PON)、术后呕吐(POV)也分别进行分析。按比较物类型(安慰剂、阿片类药物或非阿片类药物)和剂量类别进行亚组分析。meta回归用于评估剂量-反应关系。结果:纳入55项研究(n = 6676)。氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮没有显著降低合并PONV风险的发生率(风险比[RR]: 0.95, 95% CI [0.87, 1.04], P = 0.274)。与安慰剂相比,没有发现任何益处。与阿片类药物相比,PONV降低(RR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.32, 0.77], P = 0.002),但在合并分析中没有降低(RR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.43, 1.08], P = 0.107)。相反,与非阿片类药物对照相比,氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮增加了合并PONV的风险(RR: 1.46, 95% CI [1.03, 2.05], P = 0.032)。没有发现显著的剂量-反应关系。两种药物都会增加幻觉(RR: 1.73;95% CI [1.35, 2.20], P = 0.0002)和嗜睡(RR: 2.18, 95% CI [1.13-4.21], P = 0.024)。结论:氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮总体上没有显著降低PONV。虽然与基于阿片类药物的方案相比,它们显示出益处,但它们可能不如非阿片类药物佐剂有效。然而,它们的神经精神和镇静风险需要谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信