J Y Yang, X R Mao, Z H Yang, X J Zhou, X Gou, J F Li
{"title":"[The evaluation value of mNUTRIC and NRS-2002 scores in assessing nutritional status and clinical outcomes in patients with end-stage liver disease].","authors":"J Y Yang, X R Mao, Z H Yang, X J Zhou, X Gou, J F Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20240723-00344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Comparative analysis of the mNUTRIC and NRS-2002 scores for evaluating nutritional risk and predicting clinical outcomes in end stage liver disease patients. <b>Method:</b> A retrospective cohort study method was used to screen 114 cases with end-stage liver disease admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from December 1, 2016 to March 31, 2021 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patient's demographic data, blood routine, blood biochemical indexes, coagulation function indexes, arterial blood gas analysis and imaging examination data were collected. The mNUTRIC score, NRS-2002 score, sequential organ failure (SOFA) score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score, Child-Pugh grade, and clinical outcomes at 28 and 90 days at 24 h post-ICU admission were collected. The differences in clinical indicators between the mNUTRIC high group (≥5 points) and the low group, and the NRS-2002 high group (≥3 points) and the low group were compared. Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between the mNUTRIC score and NRS-2002 score, clinical indicators, and 28 and 90-day mortality rates. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients. The value of mNUTRIC score and NRS-2002 score in assessing the clinical outcomes of patients with end-stage liver disease was explored by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. <b>Results:</b> The clinical indicators related to nutritional status of patients were worse in the high-mNUTRIC group than those in the low-mNUTRIC group, and the 28-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher than those in the low-mNUTRIC group [89.0%(65/73) vs. 29.2%(12/41), 97.2%(71/73) vs. 39.0%(16/41), <i>P</i><0.001]. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal variceal bleeding, and ascites between the high and low mNUTRIC group. The clinical indicators related to nutritional status were worse in the high-NRS-2002 group than those in the low-NRS-2002 group of patients, and the 28-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher than those in the low-group [73.0%(73/100) vs. 4/14, 81.0%(81/100) vs. 6/14, <i>P</i>=0.008, 0.004]. The NRS-2002 high-score group did not differ significantly from the low-score group in terms of hepatic encephalopathy, esophagogastric variceal bleeding, or ascites prevalence. Patient's age, white blood cell count (WBC), urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (UREA), uric acid (UA), total cholesterol (TG), Child-Pugh, MELD, SOFA, APACHE Ⅱscores were significantly positively correlated with the mNUTRIC score. Conversely, albumin (Alb) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were significantly negatively correlated. Patient's age, WBC, CREA, BUN, UREA, UA, Child-Pugh, MELD, SOFA, APACHE Ⅱwere significantly positively correlated with the NRS-2002 score.Conversely, albumin (Alb) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were significantly negatively correlated (<i>P</i><0.05). The 28-day and 90-day mortality rates of patients increased with the increase in the mNUTRIC scores. The mNUTRIC score was an independent predictor of death within 28 and 90 days in patients with end-stage liver disease. The area under the curve (AUC) of mNUTRIC for predicting patient death at 28 days was 0.864 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.794-0.934). The AUC of NRS-2002 for predicting patient death at 28 days was 0.683 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.573-0.792). The AUC of the two indicators combined for predicting patient death at 28 days was 0.868 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.799-0.936). The AUC of mNUTRIC for predicting patient death at 90 days was 0.915 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.861-0.969). The AUC of NRS-2002 for predicting patient death at 90 days was 0.715 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.599-0.832). The AUC of the two indicators combined for predicting patient death at 90 days was 0.922 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.871-0.972). <b>Conclusion:</b> mNUTRIC score and NRS-2002 score can better evaluate the nutritional status in patients with end-stage liver disease. The mNUTRIC score is a good predictor of 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease, and its application value efficacy is enhanced when combined with NRS-2002.</p>","PeriodicalId":24006,"journal":{"name":"中华肝脏病杂志","volume":"33 ","pages":"470-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝脏病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20240723-00344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Comparative analysis of the mNUTRIC and NRS-2002 scores for evaluating nutritional risk and predicting clinical outcomes in end stage liver disease patients. Method: A retrospective cohort study method was used to screen 114 cases with end-stage liver disease admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from December 1, 2016 to March 31, 2021 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patient's demographic data, blood routine, blood biochemical indexes, coagulation function indexes, arterial blood gas analysis and imaging examination data were collected. The mNUTRIC score, NRS-2002 score, sequential organ failure (SOFA) score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score, Child-Pugh grade, and clinical outcomes at 28 and 90 days at 24 h post-ICU admission were collected. The differences in clinical indicators between the mNUTRIC high group (≥5 points) and the low group, and the NRS-2002 high group (≥3 points) and the low group were compared. Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between the mNUTRIC score and NRS-2002 score, clinical indicators, and 28 and 90-day mortality rates. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients. The value of mNUTRIC score and NRS-2002 score in assessing the clinical outcomes of patients with end-stage liver disease was explored by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The clinical indicators related to nutritional status of patients were worse in the high-mNUTRIC group than those in the low-mNUTRIC group, and the 28-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher than those in the low-mNUTRIC group [89.0%(65/73) vs. 29.2%(12/41), 97.2%(71/73) vs. 39.0%(16/41), P<0.001]. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal variceal bleeding, and ascites between the high and low mNUTRIC group. The clinical indicators related to nutritional status were worse in the high-NRS-2002 group than those in the low-NRS-2002 group of patients, and the 28-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher than those in the low-group [73.0%(73/100) vs. 4/14, 81.0%(81/100) vs. 6/14, P=0.008, 0.004]. The NRS-2002 high-score group did not differ significantly from the low-score group in terms of hepatic encephalopathy, esophagogastric variceal bleeding, or ascites prevalence. Patient's age, white blood cell count (WBC), urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (UREA), uric acid (UA), total cholesterol (TG), Child-Pugh, MELD, SOFA, APACHE Ⅱscores were significantly positively correlated with the mNUTRIC score. Conversely, albumin (Alb) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were significantly negatively correlated. Patient's age, WBC, CREA, BUN, UREA, UA, Child-Pugh, MELD, SOFA, APACHE Ⅱwere significantly positively correlated with the NRS-2002 score.Conversely, albumin (Alb) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were significantly negatively correlated (P<0.05). The 28-day and 90-day mortality rates of patients increased with the increase in the mNUTRIC scores. The mNUTRIC score was an independent predictor of death within 28 and 90 days in patients with end-stage liver disease. The area under the curve (AUC) of mNUTRIC for predicting patient death at 28 days was 0.864 (95%CI: 0.794-0.934). The AUC of NRS-2002 for predicting patient death at 28 days was 0.683 (95%CI: 0.573-0.792). The AUC of the two indicators combined for predicting patient death at 28 days was 0.868 (95%CI: 0.799-0.936). The AUC of mNUTRIC for predicting patient death at 90 days was 0.915 (95%CI: 0.861-0.969). The AUC of NRS-2002 for predicting patient death at 90 days was 0.715 (95%CI: 0.599-0.832). The AUC of the two indicators combined for predicting patient death at 90 days was 0.922 (95%CI: 0.871-0.972). Conclusion: mNUTRIC score and NRS-2002 score can better evaluate the nutritional status in patients with end-stage liver disease. The mNUTRIC score is a good predictor of 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease, and its application value efficacy is enhanced when combined with NRS-2002.