The Association Between Ultra-Processed Foods Consumption and Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: The Isfahan Functional Disorders (ISFUN) Study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Fahimeh Haghighatdoost, Awat Feizi, Parisa Hajihashemi, Alireza Ani, Hamidreza Roohafza, Peyman Adibi
{"title":"The Association Between Ultra-Processed Foods Consumption and Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: The Isfahan Functional Disorders (ISFUN) Study.","authors":"Fahimeh Haghighatdoost, Awat Feizi, Parisa Hajihashemi, Alireza Ani, Hamidreza Roohafza, Peyman Adibi","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) may lead to dysbiosis of gut microbiota, which significantly contributes to the development of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). However, knowledge regarding the association of UPFs with DGBI is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association of UPFs with DGBI and its common subtypes in Iranian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, a total of 1892 adults were included. Dietary intake of participants was evaluated using a validated version of a dish-based food frequency questionnaire, and UPFs were defined using the NOVA system classification. DGBI, including heartburn, functional dyspepsia (FD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), were examined using the ROME IV questionnaire. The odds of suffering from any DGBI and its subtypes across the tertiles of UPFs were assessed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for potential confounders, being in the highest versus lowest tertile of UPFs consumption was associated with increased risk of DGBI (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.17) and IBS (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.01, 3.55). However, UPFs consumption was not significantly associated with odds of FD and heartburn in the fully adjusted model. In stratified analysis by sex, females in the highest tertile of UPFs consumption had higher risks of DGBI, IBS, and FD than those in the lowest tertile. In males, in the fully adjusted model, no significant association was found between UPFs consumption and risk of DGBI and its subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher consumption of UPFs was significantly associated with an increased risk of total DGBI and IBS in Iranian adults. However, considering the limitations of the available evidence regarding processed foods and DGBI, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to provide more data.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70071"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) may lead to dysbiosis of gut microbiota, which significantly contributes to the development of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). However, knowledge regarding the association of UPFs with DGBI is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association of UPFs with DGBI and its common subtypes in Iranian adults.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 1892 adults were included. Dietary intake of participants was evaluated using a validated version of a dish-based food frequency questionnaire, and UPFs were defined using the NOVA system classification. DGBI, including heartburn, functional dyspepsia (FD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), were examined using the ROME IV questionnaire. The odds of suffering from any DGBI and its subtypes across the tertiles of UPFs were assessed using logistic regression.

Results: After controlling for potential confounders, being in the highest versus lowest tertile of UPFs consumption was associated with increased risk of DGBI (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.17) and IBS (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.01, 3.55). However, UPFs consumption was not significantly associated with odds of FD and heartburn in the fully adjusted model. In stratified analysis by sex, females in the highest tertile of UPFs consumption had higher risks of DGBI, IBS, and FD than those in the lowest tertile. In males, in the fully adjusted model, no significant association was found between UPFs consumption and risk of DGBI and its subtypes.

Conclusion: Higher consumption of UPFs was significantly associated with an increased risk of total DGBI and IBS in Iranian adults. However, considering the limitations of the available evidence regarding processed foods and DGBI, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to provide more data.

超加工食品消费与肠脑相互作用障碍之间的关系:伊斯法罕功能障碍(ISFUN)研究。
背景:超加工食品(upf)可能导致肠道微生物群的生态失调,这对肠脑相互作用障碍(DGBI)的发展有重要作用。然而,关于upf与DGBI的关系的知识很少。因此,我们的目的是评估upf与伊朗成年人DGBI及其常见亚型的关系。方法:在本横断面研究中,共纳入1892名成年人。使用基于菜肴的食物频率问卷评估参与者的饮食摄入量,并使用NOVA系统分类定义upf。DGBI,包括胃灼热、功能性消化不良(FD)和肠易激综合征(IBS),使用ROME IV问卷进行检查。使用逻辑回归评估upf各分位数患DGBI及其亚型的几率。结果:在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,upf消费的最高和最低分位数与DGBI的风险增加相关(OR = 1.62;95% CI: 1.20, 2.17)和IBS (OR = 1.89;95% ci: 1.01, 3.55)。然而,在完全调整的模型中,UPFs的消耗与FD和胃灼热的几率没有显著相关。在性别分层分析中,UPFs摄入量最高的女性DGBI、IBS和FD的风险高于摄入量最低的女性。在男性中,在完全调整的模型中,未发现upf摄入量与DGBI及其亚型风险之间存在显著关联。结论:在伊朗成年人中,较高的upf摄入量与总DGBI和IBS风险增加显著相关。然而,考虑到关于加工食品和DGBI的现有证据的局限性,需要进一步的大规模前瞻性研究来提供更多的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信