[Biomechanical finite element analysis of American Chiropractic intervention on the third lumbar transverse process syndrome based on imaging].

Q4 Medicine
Ling-Feng Zhu, Hai-Jie Yu, Hai-Fen Ying, Ben-Bao Chen, Xiao-Chun Xiong, Li-Jiang Lyu
{"title":"[Biomechanical finite element analysis of American Chiropractic intervention on the third lumbar transverse process syndrome based on imaging].","authors":"Ling-Feng Zhu, Hai-Jie Yu, Hai-Fen Ying, Ben-Bao Chen, Xiao-Chun Xiong, Li-Jiang Lyu","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20221031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the displacement and pressure distribution of American Chiropractic in a model of third lumbar syndrome based on finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On March 2021, CT and MRI images of a 23-year-old male patient with right third lumbar syndrome were selected. A 3D stl model was established using Mimics and CATIA, and the data was imported into Hypermesh, Abaqus & ANSYS. The elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio of the affected side material were adjusted to establish its finite element model. Based on the comparison of the operating positions and routines of the American Chiropractic and the lumbar spine oblique pull method, but with differences in the focus and direction of force, the experimental group simulated the American Chiropractic with the healthy side (left side) lying position of the model. The upper endplate of L<sub>3</sub> and the lower part below L<sub>3</sub> twisted accordingly with the body position, we applied a vertical forward thrust of 246 N to the plane formed by the L<sub>4</sub>, L<sub>5</sub> spinous processes and L<sub>4</sub> upper articular processes;The control group simulates the oblique pull method of the lumbar spine, requiring the model to lie on the healthy side (left side), fix the upper endplate of L<sub>4</sub>, and perform a horizontal rotation along the longitudinal axis of L<sub>3</sub> vertebral body. At this time, the contact force in the upward direction is also set to 246 N. Compare the displacement and stress differences between the L<sub>1</sub>-L<sub>5</sub> intervertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, articular processes, and transverse process muscles in two intervention models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>① Under safe load conditions, a test force of 246 N was applied to the model, and the maximum vertebral displacement occurred on the right side of the L<sub>3</sub> vertebral body (1.197 mm) after manual intervention in the control group. The vertebral displacement between L<sub>1</sub>-L<sub>5</sub> induced by manual intervention in the experimental group was smaller than that of the control group's manual intervention (<i>P</i><0.05). ② The maximum vertebral body stress occurred on the right side of the L<sub>3</sub> vertebral body after manual intervention in the control group (98.425 MPa). The stress on each vertebral body formed by the experimental group's manual intervention was lower than that of the control group's manual intervention (<i>P</i><0.05). ③The maximum intervertebral disc stress occurred on the right side of the L<sub>2,3</sub> intervertebral disc (6.282 MPa) after manual intervention in the control group. ④ The maximum joint process stress occurred on the right side of the L<sub>4</sub> upper joint process after manual intervention in the experimental group (1.587 MPa). The joint process stress on the left side below L<sub>1</sub> and the left side above and below L<sub>2</sub> induced by manual intervention in the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (<i>P</i><0.05). ⑤The maximum stress on the intertransverse process muscle was observed at the right lateral L<sub>3</sub> process end (31.960 MPa) of L<sub>3,4</sub> in the control group after manual intervention. The stress on the L<sub>2,3</sub> and L<sub>4,5</sub> segments of the intertransverse process muscle induced by manual intervention in the experimental group was lower than that of the control group's manual intervention (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mechanical feedback of the L<sub>1</sub>-L<sub>5</sub> vertebral body, the lower left side of the articular process L<sub>1</sub>, the upper and lower left side of the articular process L<sub>2</sub>, and the L<sub>2,3</sub> and L<sub>4,5</sub> segments of the transverse process muscle in the model indicates that performing American Chiropractic for the treatment of third lumbar transverse process syndrome can accurately hit the target pain point and allow the patient's tissue to form a low stress and low tension state after manual operation, thereby reducing the possibility of tissue damage caused by hypertonia after intervertebral joint movement, making it relatively safe. The application of American Chiropractic will be a new supplement to the traditional treatment plan for third lumbar transverse process syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 4","pages":"403-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20221031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the displacement and pressure distribution of American Chiropractic in a model of third lumbar syndrome based on finite element analysis.

Methods: On March 2021, CT and MRI images of a 23-year-old male patient with right third lumbar syndrome were selected. A 3D stl model was established using Mimics and CATIA, and the data was imported into Hypermesh, Abaqus & ANSYS. The elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio of the affected side material were adjusted to establish its finite element model. Based on the comparison of the operating positions and routines of the American Chiropractic and the lumbar spine oblique pull method, but with differences in the focus and direction of force, the experimental group simulated the American Chiropractic with the healthy side (left side) lying position of the model. The upper endplate of L3 and the lower part below L3 twisted accordingly with the body position, we applied a vertical forward thrust of 246 N to the plane formed by the L4, L5 spinous processes and L4 upper articular processes;The control group simulates the oblique pull method of the lumbar spine, requiring the model to lie on the healthy side (left side), fix the upper endplate of L4, and perform a horizontal rotation along the longitudinal axis of L3 vertebral body. At this time, the contact force in the upward direction is also set to 246 N. Compare the displacement and stress differences between the L1-L5 intervertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, articular processes, and transverse process muscles in two intervention models.

Results: ① Under safe load conditions, a test force of 246 N was applied to the model, and the maximum vertebral displacement occurred on the right side of the L3 vertebral body (1.197 mm) after manual intervention in the control group. The vertebral displacement between L1-L5 induced by manual intervention in the experimental group was smaller than that of the control group's manual intervention (P<0.05). ② The maximum vertebral body stress occurred on the right side of the L3 vertebral body after manual intervention in the control group (98.425 MPa). The stress on each vertebral body formed by the experimental group's manual intervention was lower than that of the control group's manual intervention (P<0.05). ③The maximum intervertebral disc stress occurred on the right side of the L2,3 intervertebral disc (6.282 MPa) after manual intervention in the control group. ④ The maximum joint process stress occurred on the right side of the L4 upper joint process after manual intervention in the experimental group (1.587 MPa). The joint process stress on the left side below L1 and the left side above and below L2 induced by manual intervention in the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). ⑤The maximum stress on the intertransverse process muscle was observed at the right lateral L3 process end (31.960 MPa) of L3,4 in the control group after manual intervention. The stress on the L2,3 and L4,5 segments of the intertransverse process muscle induced by manual intervention in the experimental group was lower than that of the control group's manual intervention (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The mechanical feedback of the L1-L5 vertebral body, the lower left side of the articular process L1, the upper and lower left side of the articular process L2, and the L2,3 and L4,5 segments of the transverse process muscle in the model indicates that performing American Chiropractic for the treatment of third lumbar transverse process syndrome can accurately hit the target pain point and allow the patient's tissue to form a low stress and low tension state after manual operation, thereby reducing the possibility of tissue damage caused by hypertonia after intervertebral joint movement, making it relatively safe. The application of American Chiropractic will be a new supplement to the traditional treatment plan for third lumbar transverse process syndrome.

[基于影像学的美式脊椎推拿干预治疗第三腰椎横突综合征的生物力学有限元分析]。
目的:探讨基于有限元分析的美式捏脊在第三腰椎综合征模型中的位移和压力分布。方法:于2021年3月选择23岁男性右第三腰椎综合征患者的CT和MRI图像。利用Mimics和CATIA软件建立三维模型,并将数据导入Hypermesh、Abaqus和ANSYS中。调整影响侧材料的弹性模量和泊松比,建立其有限元模型。在比较美式捏脊法和腰椎斜拉法的操作体位和动作的基础上,但受力焦点和方向存在差异,实验组采用模型健康侧(左侧)卧位模拟美式捏脊法。L3的终板上部和下部低于L3与身体扭曲的相应位置,我们应用一个垂直推力246 N的飞机由L4, L5尖尖的流程和L4上关节流程;对照组模拟腰椎斜拉力的方法,要求模型躺在健康侧(左侧),修复L4上终板,并执行一个水平L3椎体沿纵轴旋转。此时向上的接触力也设为246 n,比较两种干预模型L1-L5椎体、椎间盘、关节突和横突肌之间的位移和应力差异。结果:①在安全载荷条件下,对模型施加246 N的试验力,对照组人工干预后L3椎体右侧椎体位移最大(1.197 mm)。实验组人工干预后L1-L5椎体间的椎体位移小于对照组人工干预后的椎体位移(对照组人工干预后P3椎体位移98.425 MPa)。实验组人工干预后各椎体上形成的应力均低于对照组人工干预后形成的应力(P2,3椎间盘(6.282 MPa))。④人工干预后,实验组L4关节上突右侧关节过程应力最大(1.587 MPa)。人工干预后实验组L1以下左侧和L2上下左侧关节过程应力均低于对照组(L3 P3过程端31.960 MPa),人工干预后对照组为4。实验组人工干预对横突肌L2、3节段和L4、5节段造成的应力低于对照组人工干预(p)模型中L1- l5椎体、L1关节突左下侧、L2关节突左上、左下侧以及横突肌L2、3、L4、5节段的力学反馈表明,采用美式脊椎推拿治疗第三腰椎横突综合征能准确击中目标痛点,使患者组织在手工操作后形成低应力、低张力状态。从而减少椎间关节活动后高张力引起组织损伤的可能性,使其相对安全。美式捏脊疗法的应用将是对传统第三腰椎横突综合征治疗方案的新的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信