Alternative treponemal serology assays for diagnosis and confirmation of syphilis in a diagnostic laboratory: a retrospective evaluation of four agglutination assays and one ELISA.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-06-11 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01768-24
Eloise Williams, Theo Karapanagiotidis, Suellen Nicholson, Helen Toma, Kim Lynn Vo, Celia Douros, Francesca Azzato, Peta Edler, Maryza Graham, Janet M Towns, Marcus Y Chen, Chuan K Lim, Deborah A Williamson
{"title":"Alternative treponemal serology assays for diagnosis and confirmation of syphilis in a diagnostic laboratory: a retrospective evaluation of four agglutination assays and one ELISA.","authors":"Eloise Williams, Theo Karapanagiotidis, Suellen Nicholson, Helen Toma, Kim Lynn Vo, Celia Douros, Francesca Azzato, Peta Edler, Maryza Graham, Janet M Towns, Marcus Y Chen, Chuan K Lim, Deborah A Williamson","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01768-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Treponema pallidum</i> particle agglutination (TPPA) assay is no longer available in some settings. Here, we report the results of a clinical laboratory evaluation of alternative treponemal assays, including three <i>T. pallidum</i> hemagglutination assays (TPHAs), a <i>T. pallidum</i> IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and a detailed laboratory evaluation of the only TPHA with Australian regulatory approval. The clinical laboratory evaluation comprised 300 sera (120 TPPA reactive and 180 TPPA non-reactive) collected from individuals ≥18 years between 1 June 2021 and 1 June 2023. Median age was 33, 92% were from a sexually transmitted infection clinic, 71% were male, 15.3% were living with HIV and 5% were pregnant. Twenty-four percent had active untreated syphilis, 25% had prior treated syphilis, and 50.7% had no syphilis. Compared to TPPA, positive percent agreement (PPA) was 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.4-99.9%), 100% (95% CI, 96.9-100%), 99.2% (95% CI, 95.4-99.9%), and 93.3% (95% CI, 87.4-96.6%), respectively, for the Arlington, Fortress, and Randox TPHAs, and Euroimmun IgG ELISA. Negative percent agreement (NPA) was 97.8% (95% CI, 94.4-99.1%) for each TPHA and 98.9% (95% CI, 96.0-99.8%) for the Euroimmun IgG ELISA. Clinical sensitivity of the Arlington and Fortress TPHAs for active untreated syphilis infection was equivalent to TPPA at 97.2% (95% CI, 90.4-99.5%) and clinical specificity of these assays was 99.3% (95% CI, 96.3-100%). In the evaluation of the NewBio TPHA, comprising 322 clinical serum and plasma samples and 22 quality assurance panel samples; overall PPA compared to TPPA was 100% (95% CI, 97.5-100%) and NPA 98.9% (95% CI, 94.1-98.9%). TPHAs are an acceptable alternative for confirmatory treponemal serology.IMPORTANCERates of syphilis, including congenital syphilis, are increasing globally, resulting in substantial morbidity and neonatal mortality. A key pillar of syphilis control is timely and accurate diagnosis. Serology is the primary diagnostic test for syphilis. Serological testing for syphilis has been impacted by a withdrawal of the <i>Treponema pallidum</i> particle agglutination (TPPA) assay from several geographical regions, including Australia and Europe. Here, we describe the clinical and laboratory performance of alternative treponemal serological assays, with a focus on alternative agglutination assays (<i>Treponema pallidum</i> hemagglutination assays, TPHAs) as these assays comprise alternative antigens to commercial treponemal immunoassays, require a small volume of sample input and do not require specific instrumentation. This study demonstrates that TPHAs have excellent clinical and analytical performance characteristics and provides confidence that these assays are an acceptable alternative in settings that no longer have access to the TPPA.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0176824"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01768-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) assay is no longer available in some settings. Here, we report the results of a clinical laboratory evaluation of alternative treponemal assays, including three T. pallidum hemagglutination assays (TPHAs), a T. pallidum IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and a detailed laboratory evaluation of the only TPHA with Australian regulatory approval. The clinical laboratory evaluation comprised 300 sera (120 TPPA reactive and 180 TPPA non-reactive) collected from individuals ≥18 years between 1 June 2021 and 1 June 2023. Median age was 33, 92% were from a sexually transmitted infection clinic, 71% were male, 15.3% were living with HIV and 5% were pregnant. Twenty-four percent had active untreated syphilis, 25% had prior treated syphilis, and 50.7% had no syphilis. Compared to TPPA, positive percent agreement (PPA) was 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.4-99.9%), 100% (95% CI, 96.9-100%), 99.2% (95% CI, 95.4-99.9%), and 93.3% (95% CI, 87.4-96.6%), respectively, for the Arlington, Fortress, and Randox TPHAs, and Euroimmun IgG ELISA. Negative percent agreement (NPA) was 97.8% (95% CI, 94.4-99.1%) for each TPHA and 98.9% (95% CI, 96.0-99.8%) for the Euroimmun IgG ELISA. Clinical sensitivity of the Arlington and Fortress TPHAs for active untreated syphilis infection was equivalent to TPPA at 97.2% (95% CI, 90.4-99.5%) and clinical specificity of these assays was 99.3% (95% CI, 96.3-100%). In the evaluation of the NewBio TPHA, comprising 322 clinical serum and plasma samples and 22 quality assurance panel samples; overall PPA compared to TPPA was 100% (95% CI, 97.5-100%) and NPA 98.9% (95% CI, 94.1-98.9%). TPHAs are an acceptable alternative for confirmatory treponemal serology.IMPORTANCERates of syphilis, including congenital syphilis, are increasing globally, resulting in substantial morbidity and neonatal mortality. A key pillar of syphilis control is timely and accurate diagnosis. Serology is the primary diagnostic test for syphilis. Serological testing for syphilis has been impacted by a withdrawal of the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) assay from several geographical regions, including Australia and Europe. Here, we describe the clinical and laboratory performance of alternative treponemal serological assays, with a focus on alternative agglutination assays (Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assays, TPHAs) as these assays comprise alternative antigens to commercial treponemal immunoassays, require a small volume of sample input and do not require specific instrumentation. This study demonstrates that TPHAs have excellent clinical and analytical performance characteristics and provides confidence that these assays are an acceptable alternative in settings that no longer have access to the TPPA.

诊断实验室梅毒诊断和确认的备选梅毒螺旋体血清学分析:四项凝集试验和一项ELISA的回顾性评价。
梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集(TPPA)测定在某些情况下不再可用。在这里,我们报告了替代性密螺旋体检测的临床实验室评估结果,包括三种梅毒螺旋体血凝试验(TPHA),一种梅毒螺旋体IgG酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),以及对唯一一种获得澳大利亚监管机构批准的TPHA的详细实验室评估。临床实验室评估包括从2021年6月1日至2023年6月1日期间收集的≥18岁个体的300份血清(120份TPPA反应性血清和180份TPPA非反应性血清)。中位年龄为33岁,92%来自性传播感染诊所,71%为男性,15.3%为艾滋病毒携带者,5%为孕妇。24%的人患有活跃的未经治疗的梅毒,25%的人以前治疗过梅毒,50.7%的人没有梅毒。与TPPA相比,Arlington、Fortress和Randox tpha和euroimmune IgG ELISA的阳性一致性(PPA)分别为99.2%(95%置信区间[CI], 95.4-99.9%)、100% (95% CI, 99.9 -100%)、99.2% (95% CI, 95.4-99.9%)和93.3% (95% CI, 87.4-96.6%)。每个TPHA的阴性符合率(NPA)为97.8% (95% CI, 94.4-99.1%), euroimmune IgG ELISA的阴性符合率为98.9% (95% CI, 96.0-99.8%)。Arlington和Fortress tpha检测活动性未治疗梅毒感染的临床敏感性与TPPA相当,为97.2% (95% CI, 90.4-99.5%),这些检测的临床特异性为99.3% (95% CI, 96.3-100%)。在NewBio TPHA的评估中,包括322个临床血清和血浆样本以及22个质量保证小组样本;总体PPA与TPPA相比为100% (95% CI, 97.5-100%), NPA为98.9% (95% CI, 94.1-98.9%)。tpha是确认性螺旋体血清学可接受的替代方法。全球梅毒(包括先天性梅毒)的发病率正在上升,导致大量发病率和新生儿死亡率。及时准确的诊断是控制梅毒的一个关键支柱。血清学是梅毒的主要诊断方法。梅毒的血清学检测受到包括澳大利亚和欧洲在内的几个地理区域取消梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集(TPPA)检测的影响。在这里,我们描述了替代密螺旋体血清学检测的临床和实验室性能,重点是替代凝集检测(梅毒螺旋体血凝检测,tpha),因为这些检测包含商业密螺旋体免疫检测的替代抗原,需要少量的样品输入,不需要特定的仪器。本研究表明,TPPA具有优异的临床和分析性能特征,并使人们相信,在不再使用TPPA的环境中,这些检测方法是一种可接受的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信